Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/263,663

BEAM SWITCHING GAP BASED ON USER EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 31, 2023
Examiner
ABELSON, RONALD B
Art Unit
2476
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
1179 granted / 1307 resolved
+32.2% vs TC avg
Minimal -1% lift
Without
With
+-1.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1338
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
58.1%
+18.1% vs TC avg
§102
25.3%
-14.7% vs TC avg
§112
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1307 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 5, 7, 10-12, 14, 16, 19-21, 23, 25, 28, and 29 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zhou US 20190260456. Regarding claims 1, 10, 19, and 28, Zhou teaches a user equipment (UE) for wireless communication, comprising: a memory; and one or more processors, coupled to the memory, configured to: transmit, to a base station, a UE capability report including an indication of a minimum time interval between starting symbols of communications associated with different beam indications (fig. 10, receiving, from a second device, signaling indicating a latency associated with a beam switch at the second device, [0080], In some cases, these types of beam switch latencies may include, for example, 4 types of beam switch latencies associated with MAC-CE triggered PDCCH, PUCCH, semi-periodic-CSI-RS, or semi-periodic-SRS beam switch in downlink, [0089]: note second device = UE, first device = base station); and receive, from the base station, a first beam indication associated with a first communication, wherein the first communication is scheduled such that a starting symbol of the first communication 1s not within the minimum time interval of a starting symbol of a second communication associated with a second beam indication that is different from the first beam indication (when the NB signals the UE to switch beams, it needs to give the UE at least that much time before it can process the CSI-RS, [0080]). Regarding claims 2, 11, 20, to receive the first beam indication, are configured to: receive the first beam indication in a radio resource control message that schedules the first communication or in a medium access control (MAC) control element (MAC-CE) that schedules the first communication, wherein the first communication is at least one of a periodic downlink communication, a semi-persistent downlink communication, a periodic uplink communication, or a semi-persistent uplink communication (4 types of beam switch latencies associated with MAC-CE triggered PDCCH, PUCCH, semi-periodic-CSI-RS, or semi-periodic-SRS beam switch in downlink, [0089]). Regarding claims 3, 12, 21, receive the first beam indication, are configured to: receive the first beam indication in downlink control information that schedules the first communication (4 types of beam switch latencies associated with DCI triggered PDSCH, PUSCH, aperiodic-CSI-RS, or aperiodic-SRS beam switch in downlink or uplink, [0086]). Regarding claims 5, 14, 23, the first communication is an uplink communication, and the first beam indication is included in a sounding reference signal resource indicator field in the downlink control information (PUCCH, SRS, [0089]). Regarding claims 7, 16, 25, 29, the second communication is one of: a periodic or semi-persistent communication scheduled via a radio resource control (RRC) message or a medium access control (MAC) control element (MAC-CE), wherein the second beam indication is included in the RRC message or the MAC-CE (MAC-CE, periodic, semi-persistent, [0089]); a dynamically granted communication scheduled via downlink control information that includes the second beam indication; or a downlink communication on a default beam associated with a control resource set configured for the UE. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4, 13, 22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhou as applied to claims 3, 12, 21 above, and further in view of Zhang US 20190254120. Although Zhou teaches DCI, the reference is silent on the first communication is a downlink communication, and the first beam indication is included in a transmission configuration indicator field in the downlink control information. Zhang teaches the first communication is a downlink communication, and the first beam indication is included in a transmission configuration indicator field in the downlink control information (The DCI may include a transmission configuration indication (TCI) state field, with the beam indication provided in the TCI state field, [0010]). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the system of Zhou by the first communication is a downlink communication, and the first beam indication is included in a transmission configuration indicator field in the downlink control information, as shown by Zhang. This modification would benefit the system by since the DCI is a proven, reliable method for beam indication. Claim(s) 6, 15, 24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhou as applied to claim 1, 10, 19 above, and further in view of Zhang US 20190140729. Zhou is silent on the first communication is a downlink communication, and the first beam indication corresponds to a default beam associated with a control resource set configured for the UE. Zhang teaches the first communication is a downlink communication, and the first beam indication corresponds to a default beam associated with a control resource set configured for the UE (The PDCCH or its CORESET may be used for the default PDSCH beam indication, [0089]). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the system of Zhou by the first communication is a downlink communication, and the first beam indication corresponds to a default beam associated with a control resource set configured for the UE, as shown by Zhang. This modification would benefit the system by the CORESET is a proven, reliable method for communicating control resource information. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8, 9, 17, 18, 26, 27, and 30 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RONALD B ABELSON whose telephone number is (571)272-3165. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ayaz Sheikh can be reached at 571-272-3795. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RONALD B ABELSON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2476
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 31, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Dec 11, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604303
SIGNAL TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598623
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND RELATED DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598499
INTERFERENCE MEASUREMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS, TERMINAL, AND NETWORK SIDE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598532
Session Management Function Entity Selection Method, Apparatus, and System
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587309
BLIND DECODING LIMIT TECHNIQUES FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (-1.0%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1307 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month