Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/263,713

ELECTROCHEMICAL CELL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 01, 2023
Priority
Feb 03, 2021 — JP 2021-015996 +1 more
Examiner
RHEE, JANE J
Art Unit
1724
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Kyocera Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
961 granted / 1119 resolved
+20.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1147
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
79.3%
+39.3% vs TC avg
§102
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
§112
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1119 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 1. Claim(s) 1-5,7-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kashiwagi (US20080102370) in view of Serizawa et al. (US20210210785). As to claim 1, Kashiwagi discloses an electrochemical cell (figure 5), comprising: a first electrode (22) including a first current collector and a first electrode active material layer; a second electrode (21) including a second current collector and a second electrode active material layer; a separator (23) between the first electrode and the second electrode; a casing (24) accommodating the first electrode, the second electrode, and the separator; a first terminal (28) electrically connected to the first current collector and extending outside from the casing; and wherein the first electrode active material layer (22) includes a first portion including a silicon layer (figure 3 number 12) on a surface of the first current collector (11) and a first carbon material layer (14) on a surface of the silicon layer, and a second portion including a second carbon material layer (14) on the surface of the first current collector and continuous with the first carbon material layer. Kashiwagi fails to disclose a second terminal electrically connected to the second current collector and extending outside from the casing. Serizawa et al. teaches a second terminal electrically connected to the second current collector and extending outside from the casing for the purpose of providing a lithium ion secondary battery which has improved cycle characteristics and in which battery swelling is reduced (paragraph 0063,0009). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time applicant's invention was made to provide Kashiwagi with a second terminal electrically connected to the second current collector and extending outside from the casing for the purpose of providing a lithium ion secondary battery which has improved cycle characteristics and in which battery swelling is reduced (paragraph 0063,0009). As to claim 2, Kashiwagi discloses wherein the first electrode active material layer includes a plurality of the first portions in strips and a plurality of the second portions in strips, and the plurality of first portions and the plurality of second portions alternate with each other as viewed in plan (figure 4c number 12,14). As to claim 3, Kashiwagi discloses wherein the first electrode active material layer includes the second portion surrounded by the first portion as viewed in plan (figure 4c number 14,12). As to claim 4, Kashiwagi discloses wherein the first electrode active material layer includes the first portion surrounded by the second portion as viewed in plan (figure 3 number 12,13). As to claim 5, Kashiwagi fail to disclose wherein the first carbon material layer and the second carbon material layer comprise an electrolyte and graphite particles. Serizawa et al. teaches wherein the first carbon material layer and the second carbon material layer comprise an electrolyte and graphite particles for the purpose of the use of the carbon material together with the silicon material makes it possible to maintain the electrical contact, leading to a battery with excellent cycle characteristics and high energy density (paragraph 0030). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time applicant's invention was made to provide Kashiwagi with wherein the first carbon material layer and the second carbon material layer comprise an electrolyte and graphite particles for the purpose of the use of the carbon material together with the silicon material makes it possible to maintain the electrical contact, leading to a battery with excellent cycle characteristics and high energy density (paragraph 0030). As to claim 7, Kashiwagi discloses wherein the first carbon material layer and the second carbon material layer are in contact with the separator (figure 5 number 22,23). As to claim 8, Kashiwagi discloses wherein the first electrode is a negative electrode (figure 5 number 22). As to claim 9, Kashiwagi discloses wherein the silicon layer is an amorphous silicon thin film (figure 2b number 12). As to claim 10-12, Kashiwagi fail to disclose wherein at least one of the first electrode or the second electrode is semisolid and comprises 0 to 1.5 wt% of a binder, wherein the first electrode comprises 1.5 to 5 wt% of a binder and wherein the second electrode comprises 0 to 1.5 wt% of a binder. Serizawa et al. teaches wherein at least one of the first electrode or the second electrode is semisolid and comprises 0 to 1.5 wt% of a binder, wherein the first electrode comprises 1.5 to 5 wt% of a binder and wherein the second electrode comprises 0 to 1.5 wt% of a binder for the purpose of providing sufficient binding strength and high energy density (paragraph 0044,0055). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time applicant's invention was made to Kashiwagi with wherein at least one of the first electrode or the second electrode is semisolid and comprises 0 to 1.5 wt% of a binder, wherein the first electrode comprises 1.5 to 5 wt% of a binder and wherein the second electrode comprises 0 to 1.5 wt% of a binder for the purpose of providing sufficient binding strength and high energy density (paragraph 0044,0055). As to claim 13, Kashiwagi discloses an electrochemical cell (figure 5 number 20), comprising: a first electrode (22) including a first current collector and a first electrode active material layer; a second electrode (21) including a second current collector and a second electrode active material layer; a separator (23) between the first electrode and the second electrode; a casing (24) accommodating the first electrode, the second electrode, and the separator; a first terminal (28) electrically connected to the first current collector and extending outside from the casing; wherein the first electrode active material layer (figure 1 number 10) includes a silicon material (12) and a carbon material layer (13) on a surface of the first current collector, and the first electrode active material layer comprises 40 to 100 wt% of the silicon material (paragraph 0066). Kashiwagi fail to disclose a second terminal electrically connected to the second current collector and extending outside from the casing. Serizawa et al. teaches a second terminal electrically connected to the second current collector and extending outside from the casing for the purpose of providing a lithium ion secondary battery which has improved cycle characteristics and in which battery swelling is reduced (paragraph 0063,0009). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time applicant's invention was made to provide Kashiwagi with a second terminal electrically connected to the second current collector and extending outside from the casing for the purpose of providing a lithium ion secondary battery which has improved cycle characteristics and in which battery swelling is reduced (paragraph 0063,0009). As to claim 14-15, Kashiwagi fail to disclose wherein the second electrode is semisolid and comprises 0 to 1.5 wt% of a binder or wherein the second electrode comprises 1.5 to 5 wt% of a binder and is not bound to the second current collector with the binder. Serizawa et al. teaches wherein the second electrode is semisolid and comprises 0 to 1.5 wt% of a binder or wherein the second electrode comprises 1.5 to 5 wt% of a binder and is not bound to the second current collector with the binder for the purpose of providing sufficient binding strength and high energy density (paragraph 0044). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time applicant's invention was made to Kashiwagi with wherein the second electrode is semisolid and comprises 0 to 1.5 wt% of a binder or wherein the second electrode comprises 1.5 to 5 wt% of a binder and is not bound to the second current collector with the binder for the purpose of providing sufficient binding strength and high energy density (paragraph 0044). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 2. Claim(s) 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kashiwagi (US20080102370) in view of Tian et al. (CN212033138). Kashiwagi discloses the electrochemical cell described above. Kashiwagi fail to disclose wherein the first carbon material layer and the second carbon material layer are substantially free of a binder material. Tian teaches carbon coated silicon nanoparticles wherein the first carbon material layer and the second carbon material layer are substantially free of a binder material for the purpose of overcoming the problem of poor cycle stability caused by volume expansion of silicon (paragraph 0006). Therefore it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time applicant's invention was made to provide Kashiwagi with wherein the first carbon material layer and the second carbon material layer are substantially free of a binder material for the purpose of overcoming the problem of poor cycle stability caused by volume expansion of silicon (paragraph 0006). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JANE J RHEE whose telephone number is (571)272-1499. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday (10-6:30). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Miriam Stagg can be reached at 571-270-5256. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JANE J RHEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1724
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 01, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640365
NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERY
3y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640426
APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR EMBEDDING AND PROTECTING FLEXIBLE BATTERIES IN WEARABLES
3y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633600
ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING BATTERY
3y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12633525
POSITIVE ELECTRODE ADDITIVE FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, METHOD FOR PREPARING THE SAME AND POSITIVE ELECTRODE FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627009
SECONDARY BATTERY
3y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+12.5%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1119 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month