Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/263,721

FIBER-REINFORCED COMPOSITE MATERIAL AND METHOD AND PLANT FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Aug 01, 2023
Examiner
PIZIALI, ANDREW T
Art Unit
1789
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Saati S P A
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
29%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 3m
To Grant
57%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 29% of cases
29%
Career Allow Rate
215 granted / 746 resolved
-36.2% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 3m
Avg Prosecution
67 currently pending
Career history
813
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.8%
+9.8% vs TC avg
§102
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
§112
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 746 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group I in the reply filed on 9/25/2025 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground that all four groups share the same technical feature and that said feature is special. This is not found persuasive at least in view of the below rejection of the elected group (Group I) clearly showing that all the features of Group I are anticipated by or obvious in view of the prior art. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 4-9 are withdrawn from further consideration as being drawn to a nonelected invention. Response to Amendment The amendment filed on 9/25/2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 requires the step of heating the powder to a melting temperature but fails to state which component melting temperature (e.g. the melting temperature of the powder) is being referenced. Claim 1 also requires the step of obtaining a composite material. It is unclear if the claimed obtained composite material is the claimed powder and fabric composite or a separate component in addition to the claimed powder and fabric composite. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over USPAP 2006/0234028 to Pardo in view of USPAP 2017/0297295 to Bhatnagar. Claim 1, Pardo discloses a process for the production of a fiber-reinforced composite material (10), comprising the steps of: unwinding an aramid fabric (3) on conveyor means; dry distributing a powder (2) of thermoplastic material on a surface of said aramid fabric (3); heating to a melting temperature and compressing said powder (2) on said surface of said fabric (3) so as to form on it an amorphous thermoplastic matrix (12) inherently partially interpenetrated and adhered to said fabric (3) as said fabric is unwound; obtaining a composite material (10) and cooling said composite material (10) thereby to facilitate detachment of said composite material (10) from said conveyor means (see entire document including Figures 1-2, [0001], [0015]-[0023], [0033], [0034], [0039]-[0049] and [0074]-[0078]). Pardo does not appear to mention the specific size of the powder but Bhatnagar discloses that it is known in the art to use micrometric powder so that the particles remain localized in their original location (see entire document including [0008] and [0058]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to construct the fiber-reinforced composite material of Pardo with micrometric powder so that the particles remain localized in their original location. Claim 2, said powder (2) is heated to a temperature from 100 to 250°C and is subsequently compressed at a pressure ranging from 0.1 N/cm2 to 200 N/cm2 ([0039]-[0043]). Claim 3, said cooling of said composite material (10) is carried out below a melting or glass transition temperature of said thermoplastic matrix (12) ([0044]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW T PIZIALI whose telephone number is (571)272-1541. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marla McConnell can be reached at 571-270-7692. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW T PIZIALI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1789
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 01, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582200
Novel Weaving Shoe Uppers with Elastic Strings
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577442
ADHESIVE COMPOSITION, RUBBER-ORGANIC FIBER CORD COMPOSITE, AND TIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12506286
SHEET TYPE CONDUCTIVE MEMBER, CONNECTOR, GARMENT, AND CONNECTOR MOUNTING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent 12480253
INFUSION OF FORMULATED AND TREATED SILICONE INTO SILK FABRIC TO CREATE STRUCTURE AND DECORATIVE DESIGN
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Patent 12465891
DIALYSER, DIALYSIS EQUIPMENT AND KIT AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A DIALYSER
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 11, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
29%
Grant Probability
57%
With Interview (+28.0%)
4y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 746 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month