Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/263,730

NOVEL COPOLYMER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 01, 2023
Examiner
BHUSHAN, KUMAR R
Art Unit
1766
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Kowa Company Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
576 granted / 789 resolved
+8.0% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+33.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
834
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
42.9%
+2.9% vs TC avg
§102
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 789 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Priority 3. This application is a 371 of PCT/JP2022/004592 02/07/2022. Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application JAPAN 2021-017807 02/05/2021 filed on 08/01/23. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS), filed on 08/01/23, 12/24/24, 08/06/25, and 09/17/25 have been considered. Please refer to Applicant's copy of the 1449 submitted herewith. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-9, 12-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nguyen (US 5990202). Regarding claims 1-8, 12-16, Nguyen discloses copolymer comprising A-B-C types such as (hexyl acrylate)20-(methyl methacrylate)60-(poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether acrylate, mw=404)60 or (benzyl methacrylate)60-(methyl methacrylic acid)10-(triethylene glycol) methyl ether acrylate, mw=150)30 (column 6, lines 17-, column 13, lines -30, column 23, lines 15-23), meeting the requirements of claims 1-8, 12-16. Regarding claim 9, Nguyen discloses monomer such as acrylic acid or methacrylic acid (column 15, lines 32-33; read on R6 is hydrogen). Regarding claims 17-18, Nguyen discloses poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether acrylate, mw=404 (PEGAc(404)) (16 g; monomer (1)), Hexyl acrylate (40 g; monomer (2)), and methyl methacrylate (MMA) (24 g; monomer (3)) (example 1), results in parts by mass ratio (1):(2):(3) =1:2.5:1.5, fall into instant claim 17 ratio of structural units (A), (B), and (C) is composed of 0.01 to 100 parts by mass of (B) and 0.1 to 100 parts by mass of (C) with respect to 1 part by mass of (A) or claim 18 0.01 to 100 parts by mass of monomer (2) and 0.1 to 100 parts by mass of monomer (3) are polymerized with respect to 1 part by mass of monomer (1). Regarding claim 19, Nguyen discloses (benzyl methacrylate)60-(methyl methacrylic acid)10-(triethylene glycol) methyl ether acrylate, mw=150)30 (column 23, lines 22-23), results in Mn of 15,933, fall into claimed range of 5,000 to 150,000. Regarding claims 20-21, since the composition requirement is met by Nguyen, such composition can be used for any future intended purpose such as in single chain nanoparticle and/or pharmaceutical composition. Claims 1-14, 16, 20-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Higgs (US 2016/0194424). Regarding claims 1-14, 16, Higgs discloses a copolymers (para [0021], [0134], [0269]) from three or more monomers comprising monomers of methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, n-propyl acrylate, n-butyl acrylate, t-butyl acrylate, n-hexyl acrylate, cyclohexyl acrylate, ethoxyethyl acrylate, methoxyethyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, ethyl methacrylate, n-propyl methacrylate, n-butyl methacrylate, n-hexyl methacrylate, cyclohexyl methacrylate, ethoxyethyl methacrylate, methoxyethyl methacrylate, isobornyl methacrylate, isobornyl acrylate, 2-phenylethyl methacrylate, 2-phenylethyl acrylate, and mixtures thereof (para [0082]); another monomers of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate, 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate, 2-hydroxypropyl acrylate, 3-hydroxypropyl methacrylate, 3-hydroxypropyl acrylate, 4-hydroxybutyl methacrylate, 4-hydroxybutyl acrylate, methacrylic acid, acrylic acid, 2-hydroxy-3-phenoxypropyl acrylate, polyethylene glycol monomethacrylate (PEG chain M.sub.w=200-2,000), polyethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate (PEG chain M.sub.w=200-2,000), polyethylene glycol monoacrylate (PEG chain M.sub.w=200-2,000), polyethylene glycol methyl ether acrylate (PEG chain M.sub.w=200-2,000) and N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide and mixtures thereof (para [0115]), and 2-ethylhexylacrylate, 2-ethylhexylmethacrylate (para [0123]), meeting the requirements of claims 1-14, 16. Regarding claims 20-21, since the composition requirement is met by Higgs, such composition can be used for any future intended purpose such as in single chain nanoparticle and/or pharmaceutical composition. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Higgs as applied to claim 1 above. Higgs includes the features of claim 1 above. Regarding claim 15, Higgs discloses polyethylene glycol monoacrylate (PEG chain M.sub.w=200-2,000) (para [0115]), overlapping the m is integer 4 to 22. A prima facie case of obviousness exists for the polymer composition, wherein Higgs discloses polyethylene glycol monoacrylate (PEG chain M.sub.w=200-2,000), overlapping the requirement of claim 15. See In re Wertheim regarding prima facie cases with overlapping ranges (In re Wertheim, 541 F.2d 257, 191 USPQ 90 (CCPA 1976) See MPEP § 2144.05). Conclusion References Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co Ldt (JP 2017-198919), DNP Fine Chemicals Co Ltd (JP 2016-122174), Fujifilm Corp (JP 2012-108460), Toyo Ink Sc Holding Co Ltd (JP 2017-105722), and JSR Corp (JP 2003-231648) were cumulative in nature to the above rejection and thus not set forth. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KUMAR R BHUSHAN whose telephone number is (313)446-4807. The examiner can normally be reached 9.00 AM to 5.50 PM (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, RANDY P GULAKOWSKI can be reached at (571)272-1302. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KUMAR R BHUSHAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1766
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 01, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600850
TRANSPARENT THERMOPLASTIC RESIN AND METHOD OF PREPARING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600803
SYSTEMS AND TECHNIQUES FOR HEAT REMOVAL IN GAS PHASE POLYMERIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595361
TRANSFERABLE COMPOSITION AND METHODS FOR PREPARING AND USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595337
CROSS-LINKABLE COMPOSITIONS BASED ON ORGANYL OXYSILANE-TERMINATED POLYMERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583962
WHITE LAMINATED POLYESTER FILM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+33.5%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 789 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month