Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/263,886

TWO-COMPONENT MICROWAVE FERRITE MATERIAL, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR AND APPLICATION THEREOF

Non-Final OA §112§DP
Filed
Aug 01, 2023
Examiner
KOSLOW, CAROL M
Art Unit
1734
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Hengdian Group Dmegc Magnetics Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
1775 granted / 2171 resolved
+16.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
2217
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
30.8%
-9.2% vs TC avg
§102
12.6%
-27.4% vs TC avg
§112
35.1%
-4.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 2171 resolved cases

Office Action

§112 §DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: The specification teaches the first microwave ferrite must contain a total value of Al and V in the formula of 0.5 (a+b=0.5) and then teaches the amount of Al (variable b) is 0-0.6 and the amount of V (variable a) is 0-0.6. It is unclear how the individual amounts of V and Al can be greater than 0.5 up to 0.6 when the maximum total amount of each of these elements is 0.5. The specification teaches the second microwave ferrite must contain a total value of Al and V in the formula of 0.4 (A+B=0.4) and then teaches the amount of Al (variable B) is 0-0.5 and the amount of V (variable A) is 0-0.5. It is unclear how the individual amounts of V and Al can be greater than 0.4 up to 0.5 when the maximum total amount of each of these elements is 0.4. In paragraphs [0026] and [0095], the phrases “a first microwave ferrite material” and “a second microwave ferrite material” should be “the first microwave ferrite material” and “the second microwave ferrite material” so that it is clear that the microwave ferrite materials of the process are those previously discussed. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Objections In the preliminary amendment of 1 August 2023, “10. (Cancelled)” is at the end of claim 9 and appears to be part of claim 9. The list of claim 10 need to appear on a separate line. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The preliminary amendment of 1 August 2023 added new claim 11 directed to a method of manufacturing a microwave communication device. There is no teaching of a method for manufacturing a microwave communication device in PCT/CN2021/103496, which has a filing date of 30 June 2021 and is considered the originally filed disclosure. While PCT/CN2021/103496 teaches using the two-component microwave ferrite material of claim 1 in a microwave communication device in paragraphs [0001] and [0164] and original claim 10; this teachings does not disclose a method of manufacturing a microwave communication device. Therefore newly added claim 11 is new matter. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-9 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 11 teaches a method for manufacturing a microwave communication device which uses the ferrite material according to claim 1. Claim 11 indefinite since the claim does not set forth any steps involved in the method/process of manufacturing a microwave communication device, in that it is unclear what method/process applicant is intending to encompass. A claim is indefinite where it merely recites a use without any active, positive steps delimiting how this use is actually practiced. See MPEP 2173.05(q). Claim 1 teaches the first microwave ferrite must contain a total value of Al and V in the formula of 0.5 (a+b=0.5) and then teaches the amount of Al (variable b) is 0-0.6 and the amount of V (variable a) is 0-0.6. It is unclear how the individual amounts of V and Al can be greater than 0.5 up to 0.6 when the maximum total amount of each of these elements is 0.5.This claim also teaches the second microwave ferrite must contain a total value of Al and V in the formula of 0.4 (A+B=0.4) and then teaches the amount of Al (variable B) is 0-0.5 and the amount of V (variable A) is 0-0.5. It is unclear how the individual amounts of V and Al can be greater than 0.4 up to 0.5 when the maximum total amount of each of these elements is 0.4. Depend claim 2 and claims 3-9 and 11 which include the composition of claim 1 do not clarify this issue and therefore are indefinite for these reasons. The first step of claims 3 and 9 teach mixing a first microwave ferrite material and a second microwave ferrite material. This wording makes unclear if these ferrite materials are those of claim 1 or different ferrite material. It is suggested to replace “a” with “the” in the phrases “a first microwave ferrite material” and “a second microwave ferrite material” so that it is clear that the microwave ferrite materials of the process are those of claim 1. The format of claims 4-8 wherein all the specific limitations to the generic process steps are listed as optional give rise to antecedent basis issues since there is no requirement that all the or even related optional limitations are performed. The optional limitations all relate back to the required steps (1), (2) and (3) of claims 3-6, the required steps (a) and (b) of claim 7 and the required steps (I) and (II) of claim 8; and not to other optional limitations in the claims. In view of this, the phrases “the grinding balls” and “the large-diameter grinding balls” of claims 4, 7 and 8 have insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claims and in claim 3 from which they depend. In view of this, the phrases “the binder” and “the aqueous solution of polyvinyl alcohol” of claim 5 have insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim and in claim 3 from which it depends. In view of this, the phrase “the green body” claim 6 has insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim and in claim 3 from which it depends. In view of this, the phrases “the dispersion medium”, and “the dispersant” in claims 7 and 8 have insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claims and in claim 3 from which they depend. Claims 6-8 include the optional step of ending oxygen introduction during sintering when the temperature is 100-500oC lower than the sintering temperature. This limitation makes these claims indefinite since, as discussed above, the optional limitation refers back to the required process steps of claims 6-8 and none of the required steps teach introducing oxygen during the claimed sintering or pre-sintering steps. The claims teach the oxygen introducing step is optional. Claim Interpretation It is understood that the phrase “”heat preservation time” refers to time of sintering based on the teachings in paragraph [0048] and the pre-sintering time based on the teachings in paragraphs [0069] and [0091]. The phrase “two-component” and the disclosed process of sintering the two different rare earth iron garnet ferrite clearly indicate to one of ordinary skill in the art that the claimed ferrite material comprises the first microwave ferrite material and the second microwave ferrite material. The disclosed process would not produce a single component ferrite material of (Y,Gd,Ca)3 (Fe,M)5O12 wherein M is Al and/or V and the iron can optionally be substituted with Zr, Sn, Mn, Ge, In or Ti. In addition, the clear meaning of “two-component” required the presence of the two claimed ferrite which are distinct from each other. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-9 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the objection and rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. There is no teaching or suggestion in the cited prior art of record of a two component microwave ferrite material of a first microwave ferrite material of the formula Y3-2a-c-d-e Ca2a+c+d+eFe5-a-b-c-d-eVaAlbZrcSndMneO12, where a+b=0.5, a=0-0.5, b=0-0.5, c=0-0.7, d=0-0.7 and e=0-0.7 and a second microwave ferrite material of the formula Gd3-2A-C-D Ca2A+C+DFe5-A-B-C-D-EVAAlBGeCInDTiEO12, where A+B=0.4, A=0-0.4, B=0-0.4, C=0-0.7, D=0-0.7 and E=0-0.7. Since the claimed two component microwave ferrite material is novel, the method for making this ferrite material is also novel. The art teaches a single component microwave ferrite material of (Y,Gd,Ca)3 (Fe,V,Al)5O12 wherein the iron can optionally be substituted with Zr, Sn, Mn, Ge, In or Ti, such as those taught in JP 56-78102, JP 57-42544, JP 2005-97042, CN 109867518 and CN 112876230. Conclusion U.S. patent 2024/0286959 is cited as of interest since it teaches a two component microwave ferrite material of a first microwave ferrite material of the formula Y3-a CaaFe5-a-b-c ZraInbMncO12, where a=0-0.7, b=0-0.7, and c=0-0.7 and a second microwave ferrite material of the formula Gd3-A CaAFe5-A-B-CGeAInBTiCO12, where A=0-0.7, B=0-0.7 and C=0-0.7. This reference was filed after this application. While this reference has the same inventive entity as this application, there is no double patenting issue since the claimed ferrites of the reference do not contains Al and/or V. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to C. MELISSA KOSLOW whose telephone number is (571)272-1371. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Tues:7:45-3:45 EST;Thurs-Fri:6:30-2:00EST; and Wed:7:45-2:00EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C Melissa Koslow/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1734 cmk 2/27/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 01, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600907
SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOT STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR MAKING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595412
CERAMIC COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CERAMIC COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593609
Thermoelectric Nanocomposite Materials
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586701
COMPLEX MAGNETIC COMPOSITION, MAGNETIC MEMBER, AND ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577166
Manganese-zinc Ferrite with High Magnetic Permeability at Negative Temperature and Low Loss at High Temperature and Method for Preparing Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 2171 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month