Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/264,022

MECHANISM FOR CELL ACTIVATION

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Aug 02, 2023
Examiner
THOMPSON, JR, OTIS L
Art Unit
2477
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Nokia Technologies Oy
OA Round
2 (Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
890 granted / 1002 resolved
+30.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1034
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
§103
50.2%
+10.2% vs TC avg
§102
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1002 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-7, 22-28 and 44-49 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Takeda et al. (US 2022/0247529) in view of Ingale et al. (US 2020/0053607, IDS Reference). Regarding claims 1 and 22, Takeda et al. disclose a first device (Figure 1, UE 115; Figure 2, UE 215; Figure 9 and paragraph 152, a device 905 that supports temporary reference signal for fast SCell activation in accordance with aspects of the present disclosure. The device 905 may be an example of or include the components of a device 605, a device 705, or a UE 115 as described herein), comprising: at least one processor (Figure 9, processor 940); and at least one memory including computer program code (Figure 9, memory 930 including code 935); wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the first device to: receive, at a first device and via a first cell of a second device, an activation indication to activate a second cell of a third device (Figure 2, UE 215 receives SCell activation message from gNB 205 [second device] of PCell [first cell]. Base station 210 corresponds to third device of second cell [SCell]; Paragraph 104, Base station 205 may then transmit an SCell activation message to UE 215 indicating that base station 210 (e.g., the SCell) is to be activated in addition to the PCell (e.g., base station 205 in this example)); monitor a first set of reference signals from the second cell (Figure 2 and Paragraph 105, UE 215 may measure or otherwise perform AGC actions using the first portion of the aperiodic reference signal 220 transmitted from base station 210 in the slot(s) corresponding to the slot location); determine, based on the first set of reference signal a downlink timing in the second cell (Paragraphs 4 and 46, The UE may then measure the aperiodic reference signals from the SCell(s) using the associated resources, e.g., in the first portion of aperiodic reference signal in slot n and the slot offset identifying slot n+k where the second portion of aperiodic reference signals are, which constitutes non-consecutive slots. This may enable to the UE to synchronize [determine timing] with the SCell in order to perform wireless communications more quickly and efficiently); and measure a second set of reference signals from the second cell of the third device while performing activation of the second cell (Paragraph 105, UE 215 may measure or otherwise perform fine tuning (e.g., tracking) using the second portion of the aperiodic reference signal 220 transmitted from base station 210 in the slot(s) corresponding to the slot offset in relation to the slot location (e.g., during the second portion). Accordingly, UE 215 may transmit a CSI report to base station 210 indicating the results of the measurements in order to activate base station 210 as a SCell for UE 215). Takeda et al. do not disclose the following limitations that are disclosed by Ingale et al.: measure a second set of reference signals while performing a random access procedure to the second cell (Ingale et al., Paragraph 85, CSI-RS set 2 of target cell 104b can also be received (328) from target cell 104b in RAR during the random access procedure) and starts measuring the CSI-RS resource while in parallel UE 102 initiates RACH; Claims 3 and 9, measuring received CSI-RS resource during the RACH procedure). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Takeda et al. with the cited disclosure from Ingale et al. in order to early alignment with the target cell (i.e. SCell) (Ingale et al., Paragraph 62). Regarding claims 2 and 23, Takeda et al. disclose wherein the second cell is a secondary cell configured with physical uplink control channel (PUCCH), or a primary secondary cell (PSCell) (Figure 2, SCell of base station 210). Regarding claims 3 and 24, Takeda et al. in view of Ingale et al. disclose wherein a delay requirement of the activation of the second cell is determined based on: a slot in which the activation indication is received, a timing between a downlink data transmission and acknowledgement, a time duration for the activation of the second cell (Takeda et al., Paragraphs 96-97 and corresponding equations for calculating SCell activation delay), and a time duration for the random access procedure (Ingale et al. incorporating random access procedure time during CSI-RS measurement at initial access according to paragraph 85: CSI-RS set 2 of target cell 104b can also be received (328) from target cell 104b in RAR during the random access procedure) and starts measuring the CSI-RS resource while in parallel UE 102 initiates RACH; Claims 3 and 9, measuring received CSI-RS resource during the RACH procedure). Regarding claims 4 and 25, Takeda et al. disclose wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, further cause the first device to: receive, from the second device, first information indicating a measurement configuration to be applied for activation of the second cell (Paragraph 104, the SCell activation message may be transmitted or otherwise conveyed in a DCI and/or MAC CE (e.g., the DCI scheduling the MAC CE indicating SCell activation and/or in a different DCI)…the base station may use the SCell activation message as a time trigger or other reference on which the timing of the aperiodic reference signal 220 is based… the SCell activation message is a signal or trigger to the base station implementing the SCell to transmit the aperiodic reference signal 220 at the SCell); wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the first device to measure the second set of reference signals by: measuring the second set of reference signals based on the measurement configuration (Paragraph 105, UE 215 may identify the slot location for the first portion of the aperiodic reference signal 220 for cell activation measurements and the slot offset between the first portion and the second portion of the aperiodic reference signal 220. For example, UE 215 may identify the slot location and the slot offset based on the SCell activation message transmitted from base station 205). Regarding claims 5 and 26, Takeda et al. disclose wherein the measurement configuration comprises at least one of: a reference signal type, where to measure the second set of reference signals in time domain (Paragraph 104, SCell activation message is a signal or trigger for the SCell to transmit the aperiodic reference signals; Paragraph 105, Paragraph 105, UE 215 may identify the slot location for the first portion of the aperiodic reference signal 220 for cell activation measurements and the slot offset between the first portion and the second portion of the aperiodic reference signal 220. For example, UE 215 may identify the slot location and the slot offset based on the SCell activation message transmitted from base station 205). where to measure the second set of reference signals in frequency domain, or a periodicity for measuring the second set of reference signals. Regarding claims 6 and 27, Takeda et al. disclose wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, further cause the first device to: measure, from the second device, signals in the set of reference signals in a time interval specific to the secondary cell (Figure 2, slots [time interval] for aperiodic reference signals portions including a slot offset between portions; Paragraphs 104-105, UE 215 may measure or otherwise perform AGC actions using the first portion of the aperiodic reference signal 220 transmitted from base station 210 in the slot(s) corresponding to the slot location. UE 215 may measure or otherwise perform fine tuning (e.g., tracking) using the second portion of the aperiodic reference signal 220 transmitted from base station 210 in the slot(s) corresponding to the slot offset in relation to the slot location (e.g., during the second portion). Accordingly, UE 215 may transmit a CSI report to base station 210 indicating the results of the measurements in order to activate base station 210 as a SCell for UE 215). Regarding claims 7 and 28, Takeda et al. disclose wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, further cause the first device to: transmit, via the second cell and to the third device, channel state information determined based on the measurement of the second set of reference signals (Paragraph 105, Accordingly, UE 215 may transmit a CSI report to base station 210 indicating the results of the measurements in order to activate base station 210 as a SCell for UE 215.) Regarding claim 44, Takeda et al. disclose a non-transitory computer readable storage medium (Figure 9, memory 930) comprising program instructions (Figure 9, code 935) for causing a first device (Figure 1, UE 115; Figure 2, UE 215; Figure 9 and paragraph 152, a device 905 that supports temporary reference signal for fast SCell activation in accordance with aspects of the present disclosure. The device 905 may be an example of or include the components of a device 605, a device 705, or a UE 115 as described herein) to perform: receiving, at the first device and via a first cell of a second device, an activation indication to activate a second cell of a third device (Figure 2, UE 215 receives SCell activation message from gNB 205 [second device] of PCell [first cell]. Base station 210 corresponds to third device of second cell [SCell]; Paragraph 104, Base station 205 may then transmit an SCell activation message to UE 215 indicating that base station 210 (e.g., the SCell) is to be activated in addition to the PCell (e.g., base station 205 in this example)); monitoring a first set of reference signals from the second cell (Figure 2 and Paragraph 105, UE 215 may measure or otherwise perform AGC actions using the first portion of the aperiodic reference signal 220 transmitted from base station 210 in the slot(s) corresponding to the slot location); determining, based on the first set of reference signal a downlink timing in the second cell (Paragraphs 4 and 46, The UE may then measure the aperiodic reference signals from the SCell(s) using the associated resources, e.g., in the first portion of aperiodic reference signal in slot n and the slot offset identifying slot n+k where the second portion of aperiodic reference signals are, which constitutes non-consecutive slots. This may enable to the UE to synchronize [determine timing] with the SCell in order to perform wireless communications more quickly and efficiently); and measuring a second set of reference signals from the second cell of the third device while performing activation of the second cell (Paragraph 105, UE 215 may measure or otherwise perform fine tuning (e.g., tracking) using the second portion of the aperiodic reference signal 220 transmitted from base station 210 in the slot(s) corresponding to the slot offset in relation to the slot location (e.g., during the second portion). Accordingly, UE 215 may transmit a CSI report to base station 210 indicating the results of the measurements in order to activate base station 210 as a SCell for UE 215). Takeda et al. do not disclose the following limitations that are disclosed by Ingale et al.: measure a second set of reference signals while performing a random access procedure to the second cell (Ingale et al., Paragraph 85, CSI-RS set 2 of target cell 104b can also be received (328) from target cell 104b in RAR during the random access procedure) and starts measuring the CSI-RS resource while in parallel UE 102 initiates RACH; Claims 3 and 9, measuring received CSI-RS resource during the RACH procedure). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Takeda et al. with the cited disclosure from Ingale et al. in order to early alignment with the target cell (i.e. SCell) (Ingale et al., Paragraph 62). Regarding claim 45, Takeda et al. disclose wherein the second cell is a secondary cell configured with physical uplink control channel (PUCCH), or a primary secondary cell (PSCell) (Figure 2, SCell of base station 210). Regarding claims 46, Takeda et al. in view of Ingale et al. disclose wherein a delay requirement of the activation of the second cell is determined based on: a slot in which the activation indication is received, a timing between a downlink data transmission and acknowledgement, a time duration for the activation of the second cell (Takeda et al., Paragraphs 96-97 and corresponding equations for calculating SCell activation delay), and a time duration for the random access procedure (Ingale et al. incorporating random access procedure time during CSI-RS measurement at initial access according to paragraph 85: CSI-RS set 2 of target cell 104b can also be received (328) from target cell 104b in RAR during the random access procedure) and starts measuring the CSI-RS resource while in parallel UE 102 initiates RACH; Claims 3 and 9, measuring received CSI-RS resource during the RACH procedure). Regarding claim 47, Takeda et al. disclose program instructions for causing the first device to perform: receiving, from the second device, first information indicating a measurement configuration to be applied for activation of the second cell (Paragraph 104, the SCell activation message may be transmitted or otherwise conveyed in a DCI and/or MAC CE (e.g., the DCI scheduling the MAC CE indicating SCell activation and/or in a different DCI)…the base station may use the SCell activation message as a time trigger or other reference on which the timing of the aperiodic reference signal 220 is based… the SCell activation message is a signal or trigger to the base station implementing the SCell to transmit the aperiodic reference signal 220 at the SCell); wherein measuring the second set of reference signals comprises: measuring the second set of reference signals based on the measurement configuration (Paragraph 105, UE 215 may identify the slot location for the first portion of the aperiodic reference signal 220 for cell activation measurements and the slot offset between the first portion and the second portion of the aperiodic reference signal 220. For example, UE 215 may identify the slot location and the slot offset based on the SCell activation message transmitted from base station 205). Regarding claim 48, Takeda et al. disclose wherein the measurement configuration comprises at least one of: a reference signal type, where to measure the second set of reference signals in time domain (Paragraph 104, SCell activation message is a signal or trigger for the SCell to transmit the aperiodic reference signals; Paragraph 105, Paragraph 105, UE 215 may identify the slot location for the first portion of the aperiodic reference signal 220 for cell activation measurements and the slot offset between the first portion and the second portion of the aperiodic reference signal 220. For example, UE 215 may identify the slot location and the slot offset based on the SCell activation message transmitted from base station 205). where to measure the second set of reference signals in frequency domain, or a periodicity for measuring the second set of reference signals. Regarding claim 49, Takeda et al. disclose program instructions for causing the first device to perform measuring, from the second device, signals in the set of reference signals in a time interval specific to the secondary cell (Figure 2, slots [time interval] for aperiodic reference signals portions including a slot offset between portions; Paragraphs 104-105, UE 215 may measure or otherwise perform AGC actions using the first portion of the aperiodic reference signal 220 transmitted from base station 210 in the slot(s) corresponding to the slot location. UE 215 may measure or otherwise perform fine tuning (e.g., tracking) using the second portion of the aperiodic reference signal 220 transmitted from base station 210 in the slot(s) corresponding to the slot offset in relation to the slot location (e.g., during the second portion). Accordingly, UE 215 may transmit a CSI report to base station 210 indicating the results of the measurements in order to activate base station 210 as a SCell for UE 215). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OTIS L THOMPSON, JR whose telephone number is (571)270-1953. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 6:30am - 7:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chirag G. Shah can be reached at (571)272-3144. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OTIS L THOMPSON, JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2477 August 29, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 02, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 11, 2025
Interview Requested
Nov 17, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 17, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 03, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 19, 2025
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598492
TERMINAL, RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND BASE STATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593318
TIME DOMAIN PATTERN SWITCHING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587877
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING A POOR NETWORK QUALITY AREA
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574321
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FACILITATING ROUTING OF LEVEL 1 NUMBERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568010
FREQUENCY DOMAIN MULTIPLEXING OF A DATA SIGNAL AND A REFERENCE SIGNAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+9.9%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1002 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month