Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/264,141

METHOD FOR EARLY TERMINATION AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 03, 2023
Priority
Feb 05, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2021075579
Examiner
LEE, CHI HO A
Art Unit
2475
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
1269 granted / 1378 resolved
+34.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1408
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§103
43.6%
+3.6% vs TC avg
§102
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
§112
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1378 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 3-13, 16, 19-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WONG et al PG PUB 2020/0014572 in view of XU et al PG PUB 2020/0092799. Re Claims 1, 8, 16 and 23, WONG et al teaches in figure 5, a terminal (HD-FDD terminal comprising a transceiver, processor and memory) monitoring for PDCCH carrying a DCI carried in a search space (a time unit) [0122]; the DCI includes early termination field (indication information of a DCI information domain) for the repeated PUSCH [0085-0089] from a BS (a network device comprising a transceiver, processor and memory) wherein figure 5 teaches the repeated UCG where the UE switches for the downlink for monitoring for the DCI indicating the early termination field. WONG et al teaches base station supports RRC signaling to configure the early termination function [0091 0151] but fails to explicitly teach base station configuring the PDCCH monitoring search space via the RRC signaling. However, XU et al teaches the UE can receive a dedicated RRC signaling (a control signaling) from the base station (the network device) that explicitly configures one or more search space configuration (the time unit) [0059]. By combining the teachings, the PDCCH search space in WONG et al can be explicitly configured with via RRC signaling to enable early termination of the repeated transmission in WONG et al. One skilled in the art would have been motivated to have configured the PDCCH search space via the RRC signaling to enable the UE to receive the PDCCH/DCI. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled to have combined the teachings. Re Claims 9, 18, the UCG is determined according to a preset protocol. Re Claim 3, the UCG is configured before an of the repeated PUSCH, See figure 5. Re Claims 4, 19, 20, he UCG (at least one fixed time unit) is configured before the terminal start monitoring for the PDCCH DCI and before an end of the repeated PUSCH. Re Claims 5, 21, WONG et al teaches the repeated PUSCH is transmitted a predetermined number of times (a quantity of repeated transmission) and separated by the UCG (at least one reference time unit) [0006], hence they are related. Re Claims 6, 12, 22, WONG et al teaches in figure 5, the DCI format for allocating the PUSCH and includes the early termination field (a target DCI format). Re Claims 7, 13, WONG et al teaches DCI grant for the PUSCH. Re Claims 10, 11, WONG et al teaches, according to an application scenario, during the UCG, the terminal determines whether the early termination indicate whether early termination is needed, if not, the early termination is not actuated (not prohibiting the repeated transmission) [0091]. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 3/6/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Re Claims 1, 8 and 16, Applicant argues that “time unit” is defines a specific time interval used during a repeated transmission procedure for monitoring an early termination indication.”. Applicant further defines “time unit” is a specific time unit related to a repeated transmission mechanism. However, both definitions are not claimed. Re Claims 1, 8 and 16, Applicant further argues “time unit before an end of the repeated transmission”. Examiner disagrees. WONG et al teaches in figure 5, PUSCH repetition on a UL separated by configured UCG (the time unit). During the UCG, the UE switches to the downlink and perform monitoring for PDCCH carrying the DCI indicating the early termination field on the configured search space [0091 0121]. The search space (time unit) is configured before an end of the repeated transmission. Had the search space was not configured before an end of the repeated transmission, “early termination field” would have not been needed because the “repeated transmission” has already been terminated/ended. WONG et al is not explicit “receive a control signal carrying the time unit”. As OA, this is found in XU et al whereby the UE receives a search space configuration via RRC signaling (a control signal) to configure the search space (time unit) to which the UE performs monitoring the PDCCH carrying the DCI in WONG et al. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-3130. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30AM-5PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, KASSIM KHALAD can be reached at 5712703770. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2475
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 03, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 13, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 03, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706726
RATE MATCHING FOR CHANNEL AWARE TONE RESERVATION
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701563
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONFIGURING SCRAMBLING CODE RESOURCE, AND TERMINAL DEVICE AND NETWORK DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12690019
TRANSMISSION CONFIGURATION INDICATOR STATES FOR DIFFERENT OPERATING STATES
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12690054
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD, TERMINAL DEVICE, AND NETWORK DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12684618
TERMINAL
4y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+4.6%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1378 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month