Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/264,449

SIGNAL PROCESSING APPARATUS, SIGNAL PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM

Non-Final OA §101§102
Filed
Aug 07, 2023
Examiner
BOLDA, ERIC L
Art Unit
3645
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
881 granted / 1021 resolved
+34.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1049
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
43.4%
+3.4% vs TC avg
§102
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
§112
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1021 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because a computer program, without any structural elements, is merely information or a signal not having a physical or tangible form. Examiner recommends the claim be amended to begin “A non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon, wherein the instructions, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform a method comprising..” to overcome this rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, and 7-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Schildknecht et al. (US 2019/0339356). With regard to claim 1, Schildknecht discloses a signal processing apparatus (e. g. Fig. 1) comprising: A depth data processing section (evaluation device 132) that executes a signal process for phase data supplied from an indirect Time-of-flight sensor (para. [0096]), to acquire depth data indicative of a depth to a target object (112) that is a target of distance measurement (para. [0323]); and A transmission processing section (data processing device) that transmits the depth data in a predetermined output format (via serial or parallel interface such as USB, Centronics Port, FireWire, HDMI, Ethernet, Bluetooth, RFID, Wi-Fi, USART, or SPI, para. [0223] ). With regard to claim 2, in one embodiment the depth data processing section is implemented hardware designed for exclusive use of the for the signal process (evaluation device may be an application-specific integrated circuit, para. [0127]). With regard to claim 7, Schildknecht discloses a signal processing method performed by a signal processing apparatus (Fig. 1) that performs a signal process, comprising: Executing a signal process for phase data supplied from an indirect Time of flight sensor, to acquire depth data indicative of a depth to a target object (112) that is a target of distance measurement (para. [0323]), and Transmitting the depth data in a predetermined output format (via serial or parallel interface such as USB, Centronics Port, FireWire, HDMI, Ethernet, Bluetooth, RFID, Wi-Fi, USART, or SPI, para. [0223] ). With regard to claim 8, Schildknecht discloses a program (paras. [0056] & [0221]) for causing a computer of a signal processing apparatus (Fig. 1) that performs a signal process to execute a signal process comprising: Executing a signal process for phase data supplied from an indirect Time of flight sensor, to acquire depth data indicative of a depth to a target object (112) that is a target of distance measurement (para. [0323]), and Transmitting the depth data in a predetermined output format (via serial or parallel interface such as USB, Centronics Port, FireWire, HDMI, Ethernet, Bluetooth, RFID, Wi-Fi, USART, or SPI, para. [0223] ). Claims 1-2 and 7 are alternatively rejected, and claim 3 is rejected, under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Yamada (US 2023/0145578). The applied reference has a common inventor and assignee with the instant application. Based upon the earlier effectively filed date of the reference, it constitutes prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2). This rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) might be overcome by: (1) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(a) that the subject matter disclosed in the reference was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor of this application and is thus not prior art in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(A); (2) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(b) of a prior public disclosure under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) if the same invention is not being claimed; or (3) a statement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) establishing that, not later than the effective filing date of the claimed invention, the subject matter disclosed in the reference and the claimed invention were either owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person or subject to a joint research agreement. With regard to claim 1, Yamada discloses a signal processing apparatus (e. g. Fig. 1A) comprising: A depth data processing section (signal processing circuit 12a) that executes a signal process for phase data supplied from an indirect Time-of-flight sensor (phase data from first semiconductor element 11, para. [0050]), to acquire depth data indicative of a depth to a target object that is a target of distance measurement; and A transmission processing section (communication section) that transmits the depth data in a predetermined output format (via MIPI Tx terminal, SPI Rx terminal and other terminals, para. [0058]). With regard to claim 2, the depth data processing section is implemented by a dedicated circuit in the second semiconductor unit (para. [0029]) or third semiconductor (paras. [0051-0052]). With regard to claim 3, the output format is MIPI (paras. [0058] & [0061]). With regard to claim 7, Yamada discloses a signal processing method performed by a signal processing apparatus (Fig. 1a) that performs a signal process, comprising: Executing a signal process for phase data supplied from an indirect Time of flight sensor, to acquire depth data indicative of a depth to a target object (112) that is a target of distance measurement (phase data from first semiconductor element 11 used in signal processing circuit 12a to calculate distance information, paras. [0050-0051] ), and Transmitting the depth data in a predetermined output format (via MIPI Tx terminal, SPI Rx terminal and other terminals, para. [0058])). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the prior art does not disclose or make obvious, a signal processing apparatus comprising a depth processing section that executes a signal process for phase data supplied from an indirect time of flight sensor, further comprising an OPD calculation section that calculated optical detector data indicative of a detected light amount necessary for execution of automatic exposure from the phase data, wherein the transmission processing section transmits the OPD data in a predetermined output format. Further, the prior art does not disclose or make obvious, a signal processing apparatus comprising a depth processing section that executes a signal process for phase data supplied from an indirect time of flight sensor further comprising a selection section that selects either one of the phase data supplied from the sensor or the depth data acquired by the depth processing section and supplies the selected data to the transmission processing section. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed on Aug. 7, 2023 has been considered by the Examiner. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the Examiner should be directed to ERIC L BOLDA whose telephone number is 571-272-8104. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F from 8:30am to 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, YUQING XIAO can be reached on 571-270-3603. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERIC L BOLDA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3645
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 07, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603468
Optical amplifier failure prediction using machine learning
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597752
GAIN EQUALIZATION IN C+L ERBIUM-DOPED FIBER AMPLIFIERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592535
Multi-wavelength Sources based on Parametric Amplification
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585020
DETECTION DEVICE WITH AT LEAST ONE SENSOR DEVICE, AN ANALYSIS DEVICE, A LIGHT SOURCE, AND A CARRIER MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580658
OPTICAL RECEPTION DEVICE AND OPTICAL TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+7.6%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1021 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month