Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/264,892

CARBON FIBER-REINFORCED PLASTIC AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREFOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 09, 2023
Examiner
THOMPSON, CAMIE S
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Lintec Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
958 granted / 1310 resolved
+8.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
57 currently pending
Career history
1367
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
40.4%
+0.4% vs TC avg
§102
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
§112
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1310 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on January 23, 2026 has been entered. Applicant’s amendment and accompanying remarks filed January 23, 2026 are acknowledged. Examiner acknowledges amended claim 1. The rejection of claims 1-2 and 6-7 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) & (a)(2) as being anticipated by Liang et al., U.S. Pre Grant Publication 2010/0021682 is overcome by Applicant’s amendment. The rejection of claims 8-9 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) & (a)(2) as being anticipated by Liang et al., U.S. Pre Grant Publication 2010/0021682, as evidenced by Carbon Nanotube Yarns and Sheets for Structural Composite is overcome by Applicant’s amendment. The rejection of claims 3 and 5 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liang et al., U.S. Pre Grant Publication 2010/0021682 in view of Yu et al., U.S. Pre Grant Publication 2020/0307153 is overcome by Applicant’s amendment. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2 and 6-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liang et al., U.S. Pre Grant Publication 2010/0021682 in view of Shanov et al., U.S. Pre Grant Publication 2013/0316172. Regarding claims 1-2 and 6-7, Liang discloses a composite material in the form of at least one sheet which comprises woven or non-woven fibers wherein the fibers of the woven or non-woven sheet can include glass fibers or carbon fibers and stitching a plurality of thermally conductive fibers through the at least one sheet thereby forming a stitched [penetrate composite material ][0006]. Paragraph 0009 discloses that the thermally conductive fiber can include a carbon nanotube yarn. Paragraph 0020 discloses that the sheet material can include a fiber reinforced polymeric composite. Paragraph 0030 discloses that the layers are stacked. Paragraph 0036 discloses that the matrix material can include thermoplastic or thermoset. Examples 1 and 2 disclose that the nanotube yarns have a diameter in the range of 20-80 microns. Paragraph 0042 discloses that the composite can comprise one, two, three, four or more sheets stacked adjacent to each other with a thickness ranging from about 0.5 mm to about 25.4 mm [500 µm to 2540 µm]. Paragraph 0018 discloses fiberglass/epoxy with carbon nanotube yarn stitching. Paragraph 0020 discloses that the glass or carbon fibers can be oriented in the X- and or Y-axis of the sheet. Applicant's claim is not specific to the "at least a single direction". Applicant's claim 1 does not exclude more than one (1) direction of the fibers. Applicant's claim 1 allows for the fibers being dispersed in any direction. It is disclosed in paragraph 0048 of Liang that the thermally conductive fibers [carbon nanotube yarn] are twisted for more flexible for stitching. Liang is silent to the carbon nanotubes being Z-twisted. Shanov discloses in paragraph 0060 a carbon nanotube thread (yarn) is twisted in the clockwise direction [Z-twist]. Paragraph 0050 discloses that carbon nanotube thread has improved mechanical properties such as increased modulus and strength. Liang and Shanov are analogous art in that both references discloses carbon nanotube yarns[threads]. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to utilize the carbon nanotube thread of Shanov as the carbon nanotube fiber stitching thread of Liang for the benefit of obtaining a carbon nanotube yarn having enhanced mechanical properties such as increased modulus and strength. Claims 8-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liang et al., U.S. Pre Grant Publication 2010/0021682 in view of Shanov et al., U.S. Pre Grant Publication 2013/0316172, as evidenced by Carbon Nanotube Yarns and Sheets for Structural Composite. Liang and Shanov, above, remains relied upon for claim 1. Regarding claims 8-9, Liang discloses that the carbon nanotube yarns include 3TEX from Nanocomp Technologies. Carbon Nanotube Yarns and Sheets for Structural Composite from Nanocomp Technologies provides evidence for the carbon nanotube yarns having tensile strength of 3 GPa [3000 MPa]. Claims 3 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liang et al., U.S. Pre Grant Publication 2010/0021682 in view of Shanov et al., U.S. Pre Grant Publication 2013/0316172 and in further view of Yu et al., U.S. Pre Grant Publication 2020/0307153. Liang and Shanov, above, remains relied upon for claim 1. Regarding claim 3, Liang nor Shanov disclose a thermoplastic resin comprising at least one selected from the group consisting of a polyamide resin, a polyphenylene resin, a polyphenylene sulfide resin, a polycarbonate resin and a thermoplastic polyurethane resin. However, Liang does disclose in paragraph 0036 that the matrix material for the carbon sheets can include thermoplastic. Additionally, Liang discloses in paragraph 0035 that the thermoplastic matrix material is known in the art. Yu discloses a carbon fiber reinforced composite structure comprising a plurality of carbon fiber reinforced sheets which are laminated and a stitch member penetrating one or more carbon fiber reinforced sheets wherein the carbon fiber reinforced sheets include a plurality of reinforcing carbon fibers arranged in one direction [abstract and 0015]. Paragraph 0019 of Yu discloses that the stitch member can include carbon fibers. Paragraph 0018 discloses that the carbon fiber reinforced sheet is a prepreg including a plurality of reinforcing carbon fibers arranged in one direction and a polymer resin impregnating with reinforcing carbon fibers. Paragraph 0052 discloses that the stitch member may penetrate a fiber reinforced sheet, and a fiber reinforced composite structure may include one or more stitch members. Paragraph 0051 of Yu discloses that polymer resin can include polycarbonate resin. Liang and Yu are analogous art in that both references disclose a stack of carbon fiber reinforced sheets that are penetrated by a carbon fiber yarn stitching for structural composite. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention would utilize polycarbonate resin as the thermoplastic resin matrix in the carbon fiber reinforced sheets of Liang as Yu discloses that polycarbonate resin used in a stack of carbon fiber reinforced sheets stitched with a carbon fiber yarn. Regarding claim 5, Liang nor Shanov disclose an axial direction of the carbon fibers in at least one of the carbon fiber layers is not parallel with an axial direction of the carbon fibers in another one of the carbon fiber layers. Yu discloses in paragraph 0017 discloses the adjacent carbon fiber reinforced sheets may be laminated with the reinforcing carbon fibers arranged at an angle of 90°. Paragraph 0046 discloses adjacent fiber reinforced sheets may be laminated by setting the arrangement direction of the reinforcing fibers at 0°, 45°, or 90°, and preferably, adjacent fiber reinforced sheets may be laminated by setting the arrangement direction of the reinforcing fibers at 90°. Paragraph 0016 of Yu discloses adjacent carbon fiber reinforced sheets may have different arrangement directions of the reinforcing carbon fiber. Yu discloses in paragraph 0005 that the fiber composite structure and a method for producing the same, and more particularly, to a fiber reinforced composite structure with improved thermal conductivity in a stacking direction, while having excellent mechanical strength. Liang and Yu are analogous art in that both references disclose a stack of carbon fiber reinforced sheets that are penetrated by a carbon fiber yarn stitching for structural composite. One of ordinary skill in the art would arrange the stack of carbon fiber reinforced layer in Liang wherein an axial direction of the carbon fibers in at least one of the carbon fiber layers is not parallel with an axial direction of the carbon fibers in another one of the carbon fiber layers for the benefit enhanced mechanical strength of the Liang composite. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the present claims have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CAMIE S THOMPSON whose telephone number is (571)272-1530. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 am - 5:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Boyd, can be reached at 571-272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CAMIE S THOMPSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 09, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 19, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 25, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 09, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 09, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 23, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 29, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601090
CLOSED LOOP RECYCLING IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600171
COMPOSITE COMPRISING A METAL REINFORCING ELEMENT AND AN ELASTOMER COMPOSITION CONTAINING AN ADHESION PROMOTING RESIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595655
INSULATION PRODUCTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590388
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A MULTI-PLY SEPARABLE FILAMENT YARNS AND MULTI-PLY SEPARABLE TEXTURED YARN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590192
FIBRE-REINFORCED RESIN, POROUS STRUCTURE, AND MOLDED MEMBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+10.5%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1310 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month