Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/264,894

NETWORK SECURITY BASED ON ROUTING INFORMATION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 09, 2023
Examiner
FARAGALLA, MICHAEL A
Art Unit
2624
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
LENOVO (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
845 granted / 991 resolved
+23.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1025
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
66.0%
+26.0% vs TC avg
§102
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
§112
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 991 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, Claims 1-7 and 16-20, and cancelation of Claims 8 through 15 in the reply filed on 10/20/2025 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7, and 16-27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by "3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Study on the security of Access and Mobility Management Function (AMF) re-allocation; (Release 17)", 1 February 2021, pages 1-38, XP051999426; provided by Applicant; hereinafter referred to as 3GPP for simplicity. Consider Claim 1, 3GPP shows an apparatus for performing a network function (see figure 6.6.2-1), the apparatus (read as AUSF), comprising: (a) At least one memory (see page 3; figure 6.6.2-1); (In step 3, the AUSF stores a received SNN and SUCI/SUPI temporarily in its local memory). (b) At least one processor coupled with the at least one memory and configured to cause the apparatus to: receive a security request message from an initial access and mobility management function (AMF), an initial security anchor function (SEAF), or a combination thereof, wherein the security request message comprises information indicating a serving network name (SNN), whether routing information is required, a subscription permanent identifier (SUPI), or a combination thereof (see page 3; figure 6.6.2-1); (In step 2a-b, the initial AMF forwards the received initial UE message containing Registration Request to the SEAF by including the AMF Slice Capabilities. The SEAF further sends a Request message to the AUSF, which shall contain SUCI/SUPI, SNN and AMF Slice Capabilities. The AMF Slice Capabilities can indicate one or more slice(s) or service information). (c) Determine routing information based on the security request message; and transmit a security response message to the initial AMF, the initial SEAF, or the combination thereof, wherein the security response message comprises the routing information (see page 31); (In step 8, the AUSF sends to the SEAF, the response message containing SUPI, authentication result as success, Slice Incompatibility Indication. The SEAF forwards the received SUPI, authentication result as success, the Slice Incompatibility Indication and AMF_AUTN to the initial AMF). Consider Claim 16, 3GPP shows a method of performing a network function (see figure 6.6.2-1), the method comprising: (a) Receiving a security request message from an initial access and mobility management function (AMF), an initial security anchor function (SEAF), or a combination thereof, wherein the security request message comprises information indicating a serving network name (SNN), whether routing information is required, a subscription permanent identifier (SUPI), or a combination thereof (see page 3; figure 6.6.2-1); (In step 2a-b, the initial AMF forwards the received initial UE message containing Registration Request to the SEAF by including the AMF Slice Capabilities. The SEAF further sends a Request message to the AUSF, which shall contain SUCI/SUPI, SNN and AMF Slice Capabilities. The AMF Slice Capabilities can indicate one or more slice(s) or service information). (b) Determining routing information based on the security request message; and transmitting a security response message to the initial AMF, the initial SEAF, or the combination thereof, wherein the security response message comprises the routing information (see page 31); (In step 8, the AUSF sends to the SEAF, the response message containing SUPI, authentication result as success, Slice Incompatibility Indication. The SEAF forwards the received SUPI, authentication result as success, the Slice Incompatibility Indication and AMF_AUTN to the initial AMF). Consider Claim 21, 3GPP shows a processor for wireless communication (see figure 6.6.2-1), comprising: (a) At least one controller coupled with at least one memory and configured to cause the processor to: receive a security request message from an initial access and mobility management function (AMF), an initial security anchor function (SEAF), or a combination thereof, wherein the security request message comprises information indicating a serving network name (SNN), whether routing information is required, a subscription permanent identifier (SUPI), or a combination thereof (see page 3; figure 6.6.2-1); (In step 2a-b, the initial AMF forwards the received initial UE message containing Registration Request to the SEAF by including the AMF Slice Capabilities. The SEAF further sends a Request message to the AUSF, which shall contain SUCI/SUPI, SNN and AMF Slice Capabilities. The AMF Slice Capabilities can indicate one or more slice(s) or service information). (b) Determine routing information based on the security request message; and transmit a security response message to the initial AMF, the initial SEAF, or the combination thereof, wherein the security response message comprises the routing information (see page 31); (In step 8, the AUSF sends to the SEAF, the response message containing SUPI, authentication result as success, Slice Incompatibility Indication. The SEAF forwards the received SUPI, authentication result as success, the Slice Incompatibility Indication and AMF_AUTN to the initial AMF). Consider claims 2, 17, and 22, 3GPP shows that the at least one processor is configured to cause the apparatus to receive a key request message from a target AMF, a target SEAF, or a combination thereof, and the key request message comprises information indicating the SNN, the target AMF, or a combination thereof (see figure 6.6.2-1; and page 31); (see step 10a, key request). Consider Claims 3, 18, and 23, 3GPP shows that the at least one processor is configured to cause the apparatus to derive a key based on the key request message, wherein deriving the key based on the key request message comprises deriving the key based on the target AMF (see figure 6.6.2-1; and page 31); (see step 10c, key response). Consider Claims 4, 19, and 24, 3GPP shows that the at least one processor is configured to cause the apparatus to verify the SNN to verify whether the target AMF is authorized to use the SNN (see figure 6.6.2-1; and page 31); (In step 10b, the AUSF verifies the received AMF_AUTN based on the UE authentication information locally stored. If the Target AMF provided AMF_AUTN matches with the locally stored AMF_AUTN for a SUCI, then the AUSF considers the AMF_AUTN verification (i.e., Reallocated AMF authentication) as successful and fetches the corresponding UE security context). Consider Claims 5, 20, and 25, 3GPP shows that the at least one processor is configured to cause the apparatus to: transmit a key response message to the target AMF, the target SEAF, or the combination thereof, wherein the key response message comprises the key; and delete locally stored user equipment (UE) context information in response to transmitting the key response message (see figure 6.6.2-1; and pages 31-32); (In step 10b, the AUSF verifies the received AMF_AUTN based on the UE authentication information locally stored. If the Target AMF provided AMF_AUTN matches with the locally stored AMF_AUTN for a SUCI, then the AUSF considers the AMF_AUTN verification (i.e., Reallocated AMF authentication) as successful and fetches the corresponding UE security context. On receiving Security Context Request message, the AUSF based on the SUPI identifies Step 4. the locally stored security context (i.e., the one stored during primary authentication as in step 7b of Figure 6.6.2-1) and derives an authentication token for AMF (AMF_AUTN) using hash of AUSF key, SUPI and Target AMF Information Locally stores the AMF_AUTN and 5G-GUTI along with the SUPI and related information). Consider Claims 6 and 26, 3GPP shows that the apparatus comprises an authentication server function (AUSF), a network function (NF), or a combination thereof (see figure 6.6.2-1). Consider Claims 7 and 27 the routing information comprises an AUSF instance identifier (ID), a unified data management (UDM) instance ID, an AUSF group ID, a UDM group ID, AUSF identification information, UDM identification information, a routing indicator, network routing information, an AUSF address, a UDM address, or a combination thereof (see page 3; figure 6.6.2-1); (In step 2a-b, the initial AMF forwards the received initial UE message containing Registration Request to the SEAF by including the AMF Slice Capabilities. The SEAF further sends a Request message to the AUSF, which shall contain SUCI/SUPI, SNN and AMF Slice Capabilities. The AMF Slice Capabilities can indicate one or more slice(s) or service information). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL A FARAGALLA whose telephone number is (571)270-1107. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Eason can be reached at 571-270-7230. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL A FARAGALLA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2624 01/23/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 09, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603035
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND DRIVING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592185
DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586919
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING BEAMFORMING SIGNAL BY USING LIQUID CRYSTAL LAYER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588317
LED DISPLAY DEVICE, METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAME, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING AN LED DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586531
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DRIVING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+8.0%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 991 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month