Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/266,034

SUBSTANCES AND METHODS FOR TREATING DYSTROPHIC EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jun 08, 2023
Priority
Dec 10, 2020 — EU 20306530.5 +1 more
Examiner
ZARA, JANE J
Art Unit
1637
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
UNIVERSITE DE VERSAILLES ST QUENTIN EN YVELINES
OA Round
2 (Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
785 granted / 1106 resolved
+11.0% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1148
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
§103
30.7%
-9.3% vs TC avg
§102
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
§112
32.8%
-7.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1106 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office action is in response to the communication filed 6-10-26. Claims 1-12, 15 and 16 are pending in the instant application. Specification The amendments to the specification filed 6-10-26 are hereby approved. Withdrawn Objections/Rejections Any objections or rejections not repeated in this Office action are hereby withdrawn. Maintained Rejections Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-12, 15 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention for the reasons of record set forth in the Office action mailed 3-18-26 and for the reasons set forth below. Applicant’s Arguments Applicant’s response clarifies that “N-x” means “N minus x.” Nevertheless, claim 1 broadly recites “N-x” and “x” modifications with regard to SEQ ID No. 1. However, on page 21, Table 2 of the specification lists SEQ ID Nos. 1-6. All of the sequences listed in Table 2 comprise the 15-mer oligonucleotide sequence listed in claim 1 and a 5’ terminal palmitoyl moiety, but differ in the positions of 2’-O-methyl and tricyclonucleotide modifications. These specific modifications are described on pages 11-12 of the specification. It is confusing that SEQ ID No. 1 recited in claim 1 differs from SEQ ID No. 1 listed in Table 2. SEQ ID No. 1 listed in Table 2 recites different and specific modifications than those recited in claim 1. Appropriate correction/clarification is required. New Rejections Necessitated by Amendments Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-12, 15 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The breadth of the claims: The claims are drawn to compositions and methods of restoring the function of any mutated type VII collagen comprising preventing splicing of exon 73 of the COL7A1 gene encoding the amino acid sequence of any type VII collagen involved in dysfunction. The claims are also drawn to methods for treating a patient suffering from Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (DEB) comprising the administration of a nucleic acid consisting of N consecutive nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 1 GCCCGCGTTCTCCAG, wherein N is an integer ranging from 13 to 15, N-x nucleotides of the N consecutive nucleotides are tricyclonucleotides, with x being an integer equal to 1 or 2, x nucleotides are 2-O-methyl-ribonucleotides, and each nucleotide is linked to an adjacent nucleotide through a phosphodiester internucleoside linkage. Teachings in the specification: On page 21, Table 2 of the specification lists SEQ ID Nos. 1-6. All of the sequences listed in Table 2 comprise the full length 15-mer oligonucleotide sequence listed in claim 1 and a 5’ terminal palmitoyl moiety, and SEQ ID Nos. 1-6 of Table 2 differ in the positions of 2’-O-methyl and tricyclonucleotide modifications. These specific modifications are described on pages 11-12 of the specification. Preferred nucleic acids according to the present disclosure are those for which (i) the integer N is 15, (ii) the integer X means 1, (iii) all internucleoside linkages consist of phosphodiester linkages and (iv) the said nucleic acid comprises one nucleotide consisting of 2'-O-methyl- ribonucleotide (i.e. the sole nucleotide that does not consist of a tricyclonucleotide). As illustrated herein, optimal nucleic acids according to the present disclosure are those for which the single 2'-O-methyl deoxyribonucleotide is located at a nucleotide position selected in the group consisting of nucleotide positions 4 (C), 6 (C) and 7 (G) of SEQ ID NO. 1, according to a nucleotide numbering sense from 5'-end to 3'-end. The nucleic acid of SEQ ID NO. 1 comprising a single 2'-O-methyl deoxyribonucleotide at position 4 (C) is also referenced as the nucleic acid of SEQ ID NO. 2 herein. The nucleic acid of SEQ ID NO. 1 comprising a single 2'-O-methyl deoxyribonucleotide at position 6 (C) is also referenced as the nucleic acid of SEQ ID NO. 4 herein. The nucleic acid of SEQ ID NO. 1 comprising a single 2'-O-methyl deoxyribonucleotide at position 7 (G) is also referenced as the nucleic acid of SEQ ID NO. 5 herein. Most preferred nucleic acids according to the present disclosure consist of the oligonucleotide of SEQ ID NO. 1, wherein all internucleoside linkages consist of phosphodiester linkages, all the nucleotides consist of tricyclonucleotides, excepted one nucleotide which consists of a 2'-O-methyl-ribonucleotide selected in the group consisting of (i) the cytosyl nucleotide at position 4, (ii) the cytosyl nucleotide at position 6 and (iii) the guanyl nucleotide at position 7, in the sense from 5'-end to 3'-end. – As already previously mentioned herein, most preferred tricyclonucleotides are those of formula (I) wherein R1 means O, and R1, R2 and "Base" are as defined for formula (I). Thus, at least in the above-described nucleic acids for which the location of the single 2'-O- methyl nucleotide is specified, the tricyclonucleotides comprised therein are tricyclonucleotides of formula (I) wherein (i) R1 is 0 and (ii) each of R2 and R3 means a phosphodiester linkage and (iii) "Base" means a nucleobase. The specification fails to provide the requisite guidance for using the genus of therapeutic agents instantly claimed, and further whereby treatment is provided in any subject. The specification teaches SEQ ID Nos. 1-6 of Table 2 and their ability to skip exon 73 in vitro (see Table 2 on page 21 of the specification). These examples do not provide a representative number of species for the genus of therapeutics encompassed by the claims. Since the disclosure fails to describe the common attributes and characteristics concisely identifying members of the proposed genus of therapeutic agents and vectors, and because the claimed genus is highly variant, the description provided is insufficient. One of skill in the art would reasonably conclude that the disclosure fails to provide a representative number of species to describe the broad genus of therapeutic vectors and agents instantly claimed and further whereby therapeutic effects are provided in a subject. Thus, Applicant was not in possession of the broadly claimed genus. Allowable Subject Matter SEQ ID No. 1 appears free of the prior art searched and of record.. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Certain papers related to this application may be submitted to Art Unit 1637 by facsimile transmission. The faxing of such papers must conform with the notices published in the Official Gazette, 1156 OG 61 (November 16, 1993) and 1157 OG 94 (December 28, 1993) (see 37 C.F.R. ' 1.6(d)). The official fax telephone number for the Group is 571-273-8300. NOTE: If Applicant does submit a paper by fax, the original signed copy should be retained by applicant or applicant's representative. NO DUPLICATE COPIES SHOULD BE SUBMITTED so as to avoid the processing of duplicate papers in the Office. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jane Zara whose telephone number is (571) 272-0765. The examiner’s office hours are generally Monday-Friday, 10:30am - 7pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Jennifer Dunston, can be reached on (571)-272-2916. Any inquiry of a general nature or relating to the status of this application should be directed to the Group receptionist whose telephone number is (703) 308-0196. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Jane Zara 8-5-26 /JANE J ZARA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 08, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 10, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 06, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12735704
ANTICANCER ADJUVANT AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION FOR TREATING ANTICANCER-AGENT-RESISTANT CANCER, AND KIT COMPRISING SAME
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734251
COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF EYE DISEASES
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12703734
METHOD OF ASSESSING ACTIVITY OF RECOMBINANT ANTIGEN RECEPTORS
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698501
USP10 TARGETED SELF-DELIVERABLE SIRNA COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR PREVENTING OR INHIBITING FIBROSIS AND/OR SCARRING
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692547
METHODS OF TREATING CANCERS CONTAINING FUSION GENES
4y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+16.1%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1106 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month