Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/266,155

Method for Monitoring Traction for a Motor Vehicle

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 08, 2023
Priority
Jan 18, 2021 — DE 10 2021 100 894.8 +1 more
Examiner
SAHNI, VISHAL R
Art Unit
3616
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
746 granted / 988 resolved
+23.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1021
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
74.7%
+34.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
§112
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 988 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION This is a first Non-Final Office Action on the merits in response to the application filed 06/08/23. The request for foreign priority to a corresponding DE application filed 01/18/21 has been received and is proper. Claims 11-20 are currently pending yet all are rejected as detailed below. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 12 is rejected because it recites “multiping each of the…,” which appears to be a typographical error and renders the claim indefinite. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Huawei Claim(s) 11-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Huawei (JP 2020-522219) (attached). Huawei is directed to an acceleration slip regulation method and vehicle. See Abstract. Claim 11: Huawei discloses a method for traction control for a single-track motor vehicle (400) with an electronic PID traction controller (420, ASR/TCS) for controlling a drive slip K of at least one driven wheel (440) [see Translation (“the acceleration slip adjustment method includes a logical threshold control method and a PID control method…”)], comprising: sensing, using sensors (410) of the motor vehicle, a vehicle speed vFZG (Vx) and a circumferential speed vAR (Vw_i) of the at least one driven wheel; determining a control deviation Kerr based on a difference of a setpoint wheel slip Ksoll and an actual wheel slip Kist [see Translation (acceleration slip adjustment occurs when “the slip ratio is greater than the slip ratio threshold value acquired when TCS is started or the wheel acceleration is greater than the wheel acceleration threshold value acquired when TCS is started”)]; inputting the control deviation Kerr to the PID traction controller; determining a slip acceleration αK based on a difference of a wheel acceleration dVAR/dt (aw_i) of the at least one driven wheel and a vehicle acceleration dVFZG/dt determined from the sensed vehicle speed vFZG and a circumferential speed vAR of the at least one driven wheel [see Translation (“Based on the wheel slip rate and/or the wheel acceleration, the vehicle determines to enter the acceleration slip adjustment state”)]; determining a D-component MAR,D of the PID traction controller based on the slip acceleration αK [see Translation (“acceleration slip adjustment includes…a PID control method”)], determining, using the PID traction controller, a drive torque MAR,PID (TFB_i) of the at least one driven wheel from a sum of a P-component MAR,P, an I-component MAR,I, and the D-component MAR,D of the PID traction controller [Note: inherent for a PID controller (“the PID method is widely used”)]; and providing the drive torque MAR,PID back to the at least one driven wheel [see Translation (“the required torque for the acceleration slip adjustment is determined based on the feedforward torque and the feedback torque…calculating a final output torque for acceleration slip adjustment”)]. See Translation. Claim 12: Huawei discloses multiplying each of the P-component MAR,P, the I-component MAR,I and the D-component MAR,D of the PID traction controller with a factor for parameterization of the PID traction controller. See Translation (“The sensor 410 is configured to obtain current road surface parameters”). Claim 13: Huawei discloses determining the I-component MAR,I of the PID traction controller by integrating the control deviation Kerr. See Translation. Claim 14: Huawei discloses controlling, by the PID traction controller, a drive slip by adapting an engine rotational speed to change the drive torque MAR,PID of the at least one driven wheel. See Translation (“the acceleration slip adjustment system collects various signals of the wheels to adjust the drive motor and more appropriately control the torque output by the drive motor to accelerate the vehicle and perform slip adjustment.”). Claim 15: Huawei discloses determining the actual wheel slip Kist by the vehicle speed vFZG and the circumferential speed vAR of the at least one driven wheel. See Translation. Claim 16: Huawei discloses determining the setpoint wheel slip Ksoll based on a current vehicle state based on at least a speed and/or a tilted position of the motor vehicle. See Translation (“S230. The wheel slip rate is determined based on the vehicle wheel speed, the vehicle speed of the vehicle, and the steering wheel angle and yaw angular speed of the vehicle”). Claim 17: Huawei discloses determining an excess drive torque MARû that causes the slip acceleration of the at least one driven wheel being by multiplying the slip acceleration αK and a mass moment of inertia of the at least one driven wheel and drive train JAR+Antrieb. See Translation (F=ma). Claim 18: Huawei discloses specifying limit values for the control deviation Kerr, wherein the limit values define a tolerance range. See Translation (“…slip ratio threshold value acquired when TCS is started…”). Claim 19: Huawei discloses outputting a warning signal on a display of the motor vehicle if the control deviation Kerr exceeds one of the limit values. See Translation (“displayed communication connections may be realized by using several interfaces”). Claim 20: Huawei discloses a PID traction controller (420, ARS/TCS) for controlling a drive slip K of at least one driven wheel (440) of a single-track motor vehicle (400), comprising: a vehicle speed sensor (410) to measure a vehicle speed vFZG (Vx); a circumferential speed sensor (410) to measure a circumferential speed VAR (Vw_i) of the at least one driven wheel; and a plurality of differentiators to determine a slip acceleration αK by based on a difference of a wheel acceleration DVAR/dt (aw_i) and a vehicle acceleration dFZG/dt based on the vehicle speed sensor and the circumferential speed sensor [see Translation (“Based on the wheel slip rate and/or the wheel acceleration, the vehicle determines to enter the acceleration slip adjustment state”)], wherein the slip acceleration αK is as D-component in the PID traction controller to control a drive slip K of the at least one driven wheel [see Translation (“the acceleration slip adjustment method includes a logical threshold control method and a PID control method…”)]. See Translation. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VISHAL R SAHNI whose telephone number is (571)270-3838. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7am-3pm PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Siconolfi can be reached at 571-272-7124. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. VISHAL SAHNI Primary Examiner Art Unit 3657 /VISHAL R SAHNI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3616 May 13, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 08, 2023
Application Filed
May 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680591
SHOCK ABSORBER FOR AUTOMOBILE WITH ADAPTIVE DAMPING
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679156
LEAF SPRING STRUCTURE AND SUSPENSION STRUCTURE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673655
ELECTRO-MECHANICAL BRAKE
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673525
LEAF SPRING DEVICE FOR SUSPENSION SYSTEM FOR VEHICLE
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12654663
EMERGENCY BRAKE VALVE SYSTEM FOR A PNEUMATIC BRAKE SYSTEM
4y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+19.3%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 988 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month