Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/266,171

ACTIVATION APPARATUS FOR SECONDARY BATTERY AND ACTIVATION METHOD THEREFOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 08, 2023
Examiner
GILLIAM, BARBARA LEE
Art Unit
1727
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
LG Energy Solution, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
20%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 10m
To Grant
31%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 20% of cases
20%
Career Allow Rate
20 granted / 102 resolved
-45.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 10m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
121
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
48.0%
+8.0% vs TC avg
§102
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
§112
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 102 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDSs) submitted on June 8, 2023 and November 22, 2024 have been considered by the examiner. Claims The preliminary amendment filed June 8, 2023 has been entered. Claims 1-15 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 4-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JEONG et al. (US 2022/0271323 A1) in view of JUNG et al. (US 2022/0065534 A1) and CHOI et al. (US 2022/0294024 A1). Regarding claims 1, 8-15, JEONG et al teaches a degassing device for preparing a secondary battery, which includes a piercing chamber configured to accommodate a first amount of degassing target pouches and having an internal space in which a pressure is selectively controlled to a vacuum pressure. The piercing chamber includes a piercing united configured to form inner gas discharge paths [0024]. The piercing chamber of JEONG et al. meets the current limitations for the vacuum chamber. JEONG et al. additionally teaches a sealing chamber also having a controlled pressure environment and having a sealing unit([0024]). The sealing chamber meets the limitations for the second chamber. JEONG et al. doesn’t appear to teach a chamber equivalent to the first chamber of the present application however JEONG et al. does teach two buffer chambers and an uploading chamber ([0024]). The buffer chambers are located before and after the sealing chamber and are used to maintain the vacuum pressure. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the application, to incorporate a buffer chamber before the piercing chamber to ensure the secondary batteries are under an adequate pressure before being moved to the subsequent chamber. JEONG et al. clearly teaches moving secondary batteries from one chamber to others however there does not appear to be any explicit teaching to incorporate a conveyor along a moving line. JUNG et al. teaches a furnace for producing a secondary battery cathode material wherein a divided chamber provided by a conveyor is taught. Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the application to incorporate a conveyor in the apparatus of JEONG et al. so as to effectively move the secondary batteries through the necessary chambers. Further regarding claim 4, it would have been obvious to charge and discharge the degassed secondary batteries in order to effectively activate the batteries prior to use according to CHOI et al. Regarding claims 5 and 6, JEONG et al. teach several loading gates and several first partition doors (110, 130, 150, 160) Regarding claim 7, both the piercing chamber and the sealing chamber are under vacuum, it is the examiners position the pierces secondary batteries are sealed while in both chambers. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-3 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: There is no teaching or fair suggestion in the prior art of record of the specific structure of the first and second members are required by the present application. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. In US 2024/0186644, YU et al. teaches a method for the activation for a lithium secondary battery including a primary charging process, a first degassing process, an aging process and a second degassing process (abstract). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BARBARA GILLIAM whose telephone number is (571)272-1330. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7:00 AM - 4:00 PM& 2nd Friday 7:00 AM - 3:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Srilakshmi Kumar can be reached at 571-272-7769. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BARBARA L GILLIAM Supervisory Patent Examiner Art Unit 1727 /BARBARA L GILLIAM/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1727
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 08, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 12, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 12, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12431493
NONAQUEOUS MAGNESIUM BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 30, 2025
Patent 10998588
POWER STORAGE MODULE INCLUDING A COOLING MEMBER
2y 5m to grant Granted May 04, 2021
Patent 9831043
Electrochemical Energy Storage Systems and Methods
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 28, 2017
Patent 9722216
ENERGY STORAGE DEVICE AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 01, 2017
Patent 9312562
BATTERY CELL PLATE FRAME ASSEMBLY AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 12, 2016
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
20%
Grant Probability
31%
With Interview (+11.3%)
4y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 102 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month