Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/266,298

LED BRACKET, LIGHT-EMITTING UNIT, AND LIGHT-EMITTING ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 09, 2023
Priority
Dec 11, 2020 — CN 202023003674.7 +10 more
Examiner
DUNAY, CHRISTOPHER E
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Shenzhen Jufei Optoelectronics Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
558 granted / 735 resolved
+7.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
764
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
82.2%
+42.2% vs TC avg
§102
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§112
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 735 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species F in the reply filed on 2/6/2026 is acknowledged. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 6/9/2023 and 4/14/2025 were filed and are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 19-29 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, as based on a disclosure which is not enabling. The disclosure does not enable one of ordinary skill in the art to practice the invention without claiming the entire spectrogram, as recited in claims 19-25, which is/are critical or essential to the practice of the invention but not included in the claim(s). See In re Mayhew, 527 F.2d 1229, 188 USPQ 356 (CCPA 1976). In regard to claim 19, the applicant is attempting to patent an optimized white light, not but the materials that make that light and the specifics of their construction, but by functional language, that is, the resulting wavelength ranges and relative powers. This is permissible, but in order to claim the invention this way, the applicant must capture all the critical wavelength bands that make up their distribution. This means that’s the relative power of the red band, the green band, the blue band, the yellow band, the cyan band, the purple band, and the infrared band are all critical to the practice of the invention. Claims 20-25 must be rolled into claim 19. The inventor cannot make their white light distribution with only the relative power of the red band as is in claimed in claim 19—each component of the spectrogram must be recited in the independent claim. Claims 20-29 are further rejected for depending on claim 19. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Hong et al (US 2021/0367126 A1) disclose an LED package. Doherty et al (US 2021/0317326 A1) disclose an LED package. Husnik (US 2021/0293620 A1) disclose an LED package. Chen et al (US 2020/0409215 A1) disclose an LED package. Mu (US 2019/0148605 A1) disclose an LED package. Park (US 9,362,462 B2) disclose an LED package. van de Ven et al (US 2013/0020929 A1) disclose an LED package. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER E DUNAY whose telephone number is (571)270-1222. The examiner can normally be reached 7:00 am - 6:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James (Jong-Suk) Lee can be reached at 571-272-7044. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER E DUNAY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 09, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638156
LIGHTING FIXTURE WITH AN XY BEAM MANIPULATING SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631814
LIGHT-GUIDING DEVICE, BACKLIGHT MODULE AND DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING CORNER BRIGHTNESS COMPENSATION STRUCTURES
1y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631309
VEHICLE LAMP
1y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631303
Lighting Devices Having Optical Waveguides for Controlled Light Distribution
1y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12626129
COST FUNCTION ENGINEERING FOR ESTIMATING UNCERTAINTY CORRELATED WITH PREDICTION ERRORS
3y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+13.9%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 735 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month