Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/266,526

VEHICLE DRIVE DEVICE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Jun 09, 2023
Examiner
NGUYEN, LILLIAN T
Art Unit
3655
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Aisin Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
585 granted / 699 resolved
+31.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
733
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
36.3%
-3.7% vs TC avg
§102
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
§112
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 699 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims This is the first action on the merits for application 18/266,526 filed on 06/09/2023. Claims 1-18 are pending. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/02/2024, 06/09/2023 have been considered by the examiner. Claim interpretation Regarding the word “portion” as used in various claims, the applicant does not provide a specific definition of the word “portion” in the specification, Accordingly, the word should be interpreted in its ordinary meaning, which is a part, segment, section of any whole. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4-6, 13, 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Obata (US 20140285045 A1) Obata discloses: Claim 1: A vehicle drive device (500; fig.6) comprising: a rotating electrical machine (504) including a rotor (504r) and a rotor shaft (524a) that rotates with the rotor (504) (¶0073]); an input shaft (524b) including a first gear (506) and connected to the rotor shaft (524a) so as to rotate with the rotor shaft (524a); a pair of output members (550l, 550r), the output members (550r, 550l) being drivingly connected to wheels (left and right wheels, see ¶[0076]), respectively; a counter gear mechanism (510, 508) including a second gear (508) meshing with the first gear (506), a third gear (510) that rotates with the second gear (508), and a connecting shaft (538) connecting the second gear (508) and the third gear (510); a differential gear mechanism (514) that includes a fourth gear (512) meshing with the third gear (510) and that distributes rotation of the fourth gear (512) to the pair of output members (550l, 550r) (¶0076]); and a case housing (502) the rotating electrical machine (504), the input shaft (524b), the counter gear mechanism (510, 508), and the differential gear mechanism (514), wherein the input shaft (524b) includes a first supported portion (see annotated fig below) supported by the case (502) via a first bearing (534) located on a first side (left side) in an axial direction with respect to the first gear (506), a connection portion(see annotated fig below) located on the first side (left side) in the axial direction with respect to the first supported portion (see annotated Fig below) and connected to the rotor shaft (524a), and a small diameter portion (see annotated fig below) located between the first supported portion (see annotated fig below) and the connection portion (see annotated fig below) in the axial direction and having a diameter smaller than an outside diameter (see annotated fig below) of the first supported portion and an outside diameter (see annotated fig below) of the connection portion, the axial direction being a direction along a rotation axis of the rotor (504r), the first side (left side) in the axial direction being a side in the axial direction on which the rotor is located with respect to the first gear (506), and a second side (right side) in the axial direction being an opposite side in the axial direction to the first side (left side) in the axial direction. PNG media_image1.png 871 986 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim 4: the vehicle drive device according to claim 1,wherein: an inner peripheral surface of the rotor shaft (524a) is provided with a spline engaging portion (see annotated fig below); an outer peripheral surface of the connection portion is provided with a spline engaged portion (see annotated fig below); and the small diameter portion has a smaller diameter than a diameter of an imaginary circle connecting tops of protrusions of the spline engaged portion (see annotated fig below). PNG media_image2.png 782 824 media_image2.png Greyscale Claim 5: the vehicle drive device according to claim 1, wherein: an inner peripheral surface of the rotor shaft is provided with a spline engaging portion (see annotated fig below ); an outer peripheral surface of the connection portion is provided with a spline engaged portion (see annotated fig below ); and the small diameter portion has a smaller diameter than a diameter of an imaginary circle connecting bottoms of recesses of the spline engaged portion (e.g. the spline engaged portion of connection portion). PNG media_image3.png 782 824 media_image3.png Greyscale Claims 6, 13, 16: wherein the input shaft (524b) includes a first bearing positioning portion (see annotated fig below) located on the second side (right side) in the axial direction with respect to the first bearing (534). PNG media_image4.png 686 764 media_image4.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2-3, 7-12, 14-15, 17-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Obata (US 20140285045 A1) in view of FUJIKAWA (US 20190264794 A1) Claim 2: Obata discloses the vehicle drive device according to claim 1, wherein: the rotor shaft (524a) includes a rotor shaft supported portion (see annotated fig below) supported by the case (502) via a second bearing (528) located on the second side (right side) in the axial direction with respect to the rotor (504r) and on the first side (left side) in the axial direction with respect to the first bearing (534); and PNG media_image5.png 832 824 media_image5.png Greyscale Obata does not disclose the small diameter is located so as to overlap the rotor shaft supported portion as viewed in a radial direction along a radial direction of the input shaft. FUJIKAWA teaches a drive device (4; Fig.2) having a rotor shaft (21) includes a rotor shaft supported portion (see annotated fig below) supported by a case (30) via a bearing (47); wherein a small diameter of input shaft (16) is located so as to overlap the rotor shaft supported portion (see annotated fig below) as viewed in a radial direction along a radial direction of the input shaft (16). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to replace rotor shaft of Obata with rotor shaft as taught by FUJIKAWA such that the small diameter is located so as to overlap the rotor shaft supported portion as viewed in a radial direction along a radial direction of the input shaft in the device of Obata for the purpose increasing torsional stiffnesses and reducing vibration. As the suggested modified device would be replace rotor shaft of Obata with rotor shaft of FUJIKAWA. PNG media_image6.png 712 758 media_image6.png Greyscale Claim 3: Obata as modified by FUJIKAWA discloses the vehicle drive device according to claim 2, wherein: the first bearing (534) is supported by a bearing support portion (518) of the case (502); and the second bearing (528) is supported by the same bearing support portion (518) as the first bearing is. Claims 7-8: wherein: an inner peripheral surface of the rotor shaft (524a) is provided with a spline engaging portion (see annotated fig below); an outer peripheral surface of the connection portion is provided with a spline engaged portion (see annotated fig below); and the small diameter portion has a smaller diameter than a diameter of an imaginary circle connecting tops of protrusions of the spline engaged portion (see annotated fig below). PNG media_image2.png 782 824 media_image2.png Greyscale Claims 9-10: the vehicle drive device according to claim 1, wherein: an inner peripheral surface of the rotor shaft is provided with a spline engaging portion (see annotated fig below ); an outer peripheral surface of the connection portion is provided with a spline engaged portion (see annotated fig below ); and the small diameter portion has a smaller diameter than a diameter of an imaginary circle connecting bottoms of recesses of the spline engaged portion (e.g. the spline engaged portion of connection portion). PNG media_image3.png 782 824 media_image3.png Greyscale Claims 11-12, 14-15, 17-18: wherein the input shaft (524b) includes a first bearing positioning portion (see annotated fig below) located on the second side (right side) in the axial direction with respect to the first bearing (534). Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Mogi (US 6952061 B2) discloses a drive unit having rotor shaft and input shaft. KIYOKAMI (US 20190081537 A1) discloses a drive unit having rotor shaft and input shaft. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Lillian T Nguyen whose telephone number is (571)270-5404. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:30am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ernesto Suarez can be reached at (571)270-5565. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERNESTO A SUAREZ/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3655 /LILLIAN T NGUYEN/Examiner, Art Unit 3655
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 09, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Oct 22, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 22, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 06, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 17, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590609
Clutch Assembly
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12576706
COMPACT P2 HYBRID ARCHITECTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571433
ELECTRONIC CONTROL CLUTCH STRUCTURE OF AN ACTUATOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12552239
POWER TRANSMISSION DEVICE FOR HYBRID VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12539748
MULTI-SPEED ELECTRIC DRIVE AXLE USING MULTI-LAYSHAFT TRANSMISSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+14.4%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 699 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month