Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/266,536

A CAP FOR SENSING ONE OR MORE CONDITIONS WITHIN A PIPE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 09, 2023
Priority
Dec 10, 2020 — GB 2019519.4 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, QUANG X.L.
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Hpi Technologies Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
47%
Grant Probability
Moderate
2-3
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
61%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 47% of resolved cases
47%
Career Allowance Rate
221 granted / 472 resolved
-21.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
502
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
89.1%
+49.1% vs TC avg
§102
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
§112
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 472 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on the combination of references applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 29-41 and 43-49 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gibson et al. (US Publication 2020/0378859; IDS dated 08/09/2023 US Publication Cite No. 3; hereinafter Gibson) in view of Howitt (US Patent 9,983,092). With regards to claim 29, Gibson teaches a cap (150) for fitting to a pipe end (140a) to detect one or more conditions within a pipe (abstract), the cap comprising: a housing (FIG. 2) comprising a first opening (bottom end of 230) at a first end thereof (FIG. 2-3A), the first opening comprising a fitting means (216) arranged to cooperate with a corresponding fitting means of the pipe end (140a) to secure the cap to the pipe end ([0040-0041]); and a sensor (380), the sensor being configured to detect one or more conditions within the pipe ([0045-0046]), wherein, when the cap (150) is fitted to a pipe end (140a; FIG. 1), the sensor is arranged to detect one or more conditions within a pipe comprising the pipe end ([0045-0046, 0052]). However, Gibson is silent regarding wherein the cap comprises an electrical connection point for the sensor on an external wall of the cap. Howitt teaches a cap (14; FIG. 2) of a hydrant similar to Gibson, wherein the cap (14; FIG. 2) comprises an electrical connection point (16) for the sensor on an external wall of the cap (col. 8, lines 30-47; FIG. 2). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to replace one known type of communication connection of the sensor as taught by Gibson (wireless through antenna) with another known type of communication connection equivalent as taught by Howitt (wired connection) with reasonable expectation of transmitting the sensor data to the user as originally intended. With regards to claim 30, Gibson, as modified by Howitt, teaches (citations to Gibson unless specified otherwise) the cap of claim 29, wherein the pipe end is one end of a pipe tee (FIG. 1). With regards to claim 31, Gibson, as modified by Howitt, teaches (citations to Gibson unless specified otherwise) the cap of claim 29, wherein the fitting means (216) of the first opening is a screw thread located on an internal wall of the housing ([0040-0041]), and wherein the corresponding fitting means of the pipe end is a corresponding screw thread on an external wall of the pipe end ([0041]; FIG. 1). With regards to claim 32, Gibson, as modified by Howitt, teaches (citations to Gibson unless specified otherwise) the cap of claim 29, wherein the sensor (380) is located within the housing (150; [0043]; FIG. 3A). With regards to claim 33, Gibson, as modified by Howitt, teaches (citations to Gibson unless specified otherwise) the cap of claim 29, wherein the cap comprises a second opening (top portion of 230) at a second end thereof, the second opening being arranged to receive a sensor module (including 240) including the sensor (380; FIG. 3A). With regards to claim 34, Gibson, as modified by Howitt, teaches (citations to Gibson unless specified otherwise) the cap of claim 33, wherein the sensor module (380) is removable ([0044]). With regards to claim 35, Gibson, as modified by Howitt, teaches (citations to Gibson unless specified otherwise) the cap of claim 33, wherein the sensor module (including 240) comprises a sensor module fitting means (structure of housing 240 and 336) arranged to cooperate with a corresponding second opening fitting means (including 332 and 334) of the second opening to secure the sensor module within the second opening ([0044]; FIG. 3A). With regards to claim 36, Gibson, as modified by Howitt, teaches (citations to Gibson unless specified otherwise) the cap of claim 35, wherein the sensor module fitting means (structure of housing 240 and 336) comprises a screw thread (thread of 336) located on an external wall of the sensor module (threads of 336 are located outside of the cavity 310 where the sensor 380 is located), and wherein the corresponding second opening fitting means (including 332 and 334) comprises a corresponding screw thread (threads of fastener hole 334; [0044]) on an internal wall of the second opening (FIG. 3A). With regards to claim 37, Gibson, as modified by Howitt, teaches (citations to Gibson unless specified otherwise) the cap of claim 33, wherein the sensor module (240) comprises a first end (bottom portion as in FIG. 3A) and a second end (top portion as in FIG. 3A) and wherein, when the sensor module (240) is received into the second opening (top portion of 230), the first end of the sensor module is in communication with an interior of the cap (i.e. vibration movement via contact through post 332; [0052]) and the second end (top portion of 240; FIG. 3A) of the sensor module (240) is in communication with an exterior of the cap (280; [0044]). With regards to claim 38, Gibson, as modified by Howitt, teaches (citations to Gibson unless specified otherwise) the cap of claim 37, wherein the sensor (380) is located at the first end of the sensor module (380 extends across the thickness of 240 from the first end to the second end; FIG. 3A and 4). With regards to claim 39, Gibson, as modified by Howitt, teaches (citations to Gibson unless specified otherwise) the cap of claim 37, wherein the first end (bottom portion as in FIG. 3A) protrudes into the interior of the cap (see FIG. 3A, the first end protrude downward to surface of 230) but does not extend beyond the cap (FIG. 2-3A). With regards to claim 40, Gibson, as modified by Howitt, teaches (citations to Gibson unless specified otherwise) the cap of claim 33, wherein the sensor (380) is integral with the sensor module (FIG. 3A and 4; [0049-0050]). With regards to claim 41, Gibson, as modified by Howitt, teaches (citations to Gibson unless specified otherwise) the cap of claim 37, wherein the second end of the sensor module comprises an electrical connection point (21, 22) for the sensor ([0024, 0026]; FIG. 1). With regards to claim 43, Gibson, as modified by Howitt, teaches (citations to Gibson unless specified otherwise) the cap of claim 29, wherein the sensor is a piezoresistive sensor ([0048]). With regards to claim 44, Gibson, as modified by Howitt, teaches (citations to Gibson unless specified otherwise) the cap of claim 29, wherein the one or more conditions comprises at least one of a force (vibration sensor, [0048]), pressure or temperature. With regards to claim 45, Gibson teaches a system for detecting one or more conditions within a pipe (abstract), the system comprising: a cap (150) comprising: a housing (FIG. 2-3A) comprising a first opening (bottom end of 230) at a first end thereof, the opening comprising a fitting means (216) arranged to cooperate with a corresponding fitting means of a pipe end (140a) to secure the cap to the pipe end ([0040-0041]); and a sensor (380), the sensor being configured to detect one or more conditions within a pipe based at least in part on fitting the cap to the pipe end ([0045-0046]); and a processing unit (362) electrically connected to the sensor of the cap via an electrical connection point ([0046]), wherein the processing unit is arranged to determine one or more conditions within the pipe ([0046]). However, Gibson is silent regarding wherein the cap comprises an electrical connection point for the sensor on an external wall of the cap. However, Gibson is silent regarding wherein the cap comprises an electrical connection point for the sensor on an external wall of the cap. Howitt teaches a cap (14; FIG. 2) of a hydrant similar to Gibson, wherein the cap (14; FIG. 2) comprises an electrical connection point (16) for the sensor on an external wall of the cap (col. 8, lines 30-47; FIG. 2). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to replace one known type of communication connection of the sensor as taught by Gibson (wireless through antenna) with another known type of communication connection equivalent as taught by Howitt (wired connection) with reasonable expectation of transmitting the sensor data to the user as originally intended. With regards to claim 46, Gibson, as modified by Howitt, teaches (citations to Gibson unless specified otherwise) the system of claim 45, wherein the cap (150) comprises the processing unit (362; FIG. 3A; [0045]). With regards to claim 47, Gibson, as modified by Howitt, teaches (citations to Gibson unless specified otherwise) the system of claim 46, wherein the processing unit (362) and the cap are integrally formed (FIG. 2-3A). With regards to claim 48, Gibson, as modified by Howitt, teaches (citations to Gibson unless specified otherwise) a method for detecting a change in one or more conditions within a pipe using the system of claim 45, comprising: detecting, based on a first signal from the sensor (one of vibration patterns), a first reading relating to a condition within the pipe at a first time ([0046]); detecting, based on a second signal from the sensor (one of vibration patterns), a second reading relating to the condition within the pipe at a second time ([0046]); and determining, by the processing unit, a change in the condition based on a difference between the first reading and the second reading ([0046]). With regards to claim 49, Gibson, as modified by Howitt, teaches (citations to Gibson unless specified otherwise) the system of claim 45, wherein: the pipe comprises a purge tee (100) configured to be coupled to a gas pipe (198; [0038]), the pipe end (140a) comprises one end of the purge tee (FIG. 1), and the cap is sized and shaped to fit the one end of the purge tee ([0039]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to QUANG X.L NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1585. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, STEPHEN D. MEIER can be reached at (571) 272-2149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /QXN/ Examiner, Art Unit 2853 /STEPHEN D MEIER/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 09, 2023
Application Filed
May 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 21, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638140
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING A PIPE
3y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631445
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR IDENTIFYING SUBSTRATES SUITABLE FOR USE IN MAGNETIC RECORDING MEDIA
2y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12629955
SUBSTRATE AND SYSTEM FOR PRINTING SECURITY SYMBOLS ON SUBSTRATE USING MICROPRINTING TECHNIQUES
1y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12622211
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING A SUBSTRATE
3y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12611119
A TEST METHOD FOR ASSESSING SPINAL OR SKELETAL ALIGNMENT
2y 6m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
47%
Grant Probability
61%
With Interview (+13.8%)
3y 3m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 472 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month