Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/266,711

ZINC RECOVERY METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 12, 2023
Examiner
WILKINS III, HARRY D
Art Unit
1794
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Kinotech Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
679 granted / 1087 resolved
-2.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1130
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
49.6%
+9.6% vs TC avg
§102
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§112
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1087 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4, 7-9, and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Cusanelli et al (US 3,743,501). Cusanelli et al teach (see figs. 1 and 2, col. 4, lines 37-75) a zinc recovery method from a raw material that contains zinc, the method comprising an alkali washing step (dilute caustic preleach) of the raw material with an alkali aqueous solution to remove soluble halogen compounds and a subsequent dissolving step (releaching) of the raw material which has had the halogen compounds removed using an alkaline fluid at a temperature of about 100ׄ°C. The alkaline fluid used in the dissolving step had a higher concentration than the alkaline fluid used in the washing step. The liquid output of the washing step, that containing the solubilized halogen compounds, was not sent to the dissolving step. After the dissolving step, Cusanelli et al sent the solution containing the dissolved zinc to a recovering step comprising electrowinning (i.e. by electrolysis). Regarding claim 2, Cusanelli et al discuss (see col. 4, lines 67-71) the need to remove ferrous iron from the solution containing the dissolved zinc. This ferrous iron is considered to inherently be present in the starting raw material. Regarding claim 3, Cusanelli et al teach performing the recovery method on electric furnace oxides. Such materials inherently include at least some zinc ferrite. Regarding claim 4, the dissolving step (releaching) of Cusanelli et al was done at atmospheric pressure at a temperature of about 100°C. Regarding claim 7, Cusanelli et al, as discussed above, teach the recovery step of zinc from the liquid phase being by electrolysis and discharging the decomposed halogen compound prior to the electrolyzing step. Note that the halogen compound is considered to inherently include at least some organic halogen (e.g. polyvinylchloride contamination from the electric furnace). Regarding claim 8, Cusanelli et al teach (see col. 4, lines 67-71) performing a substep of separating a solid phase containing iron by aeration and filtering which also produced a liquid phase containing zinc. Regarding claim 9, Cusanelli et al teach recovery of the zinc as zinc metal. Regarding claim 11, Cusanelli et al teach (see fig. 2) regeneration of the alkaline fluid during the electrolysis step and recycling the alkaline fluid to the dissolving step. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cusanelli et al (US 3,743,501) in view of Koningen et al (US 2008/0206127). Cusanelli et al teach the dissolving step (releaching) occurring at atmospheric pressure and a temperature of about 100ׄ°C. Cusanelli et al fail to teach the dissolving step occurring at pressures above atmospheric and at a temperature between 105°C and 220°C. Koningen et al teach (see abstract, fig. 1, paragraphs [0007]-[0012]) in the same field of zinc recovery from metallurgical waste dust, that leaching of the dust that would normally solubilize the iron content of the dust can be altered by performing the leaching at high temperatures (above 100°C) and pressures (at least 220 psig) to force the iron that is leached to reprecipitate as iron oxide. This permitted preferential leaching of the non-ferrous (e.g. zinc) content of the waste dust while leaving the iron content of the dust in the solid phase. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to have modified the dissolving step of Cusanelli et al according to the suggestion of Koningen et al by conducting the dissolving step at temperatures above 100°C and pressures above 220 psig in order to force any iron content of the raw material to reprecipitate as iron oxide thereby improving the purity of the zinc solution sent to electrowinning. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HARRY D WILKINS III whose telephone number is (571)272-1251. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30am -6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James Lin can be reached at 571-272-8902. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HARRY D WILKINS III/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1794
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 12, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601074
METHOD FOR GENERATING HYDROGEN AND OXYGEN FROM A LIQUID FEED STREAM COMPRISING WATER, AND DEVICE THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12577695
SYSTEM OF UTILIZING CARBON DIOXIDE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577685
ELECTROLYTIC WATER SPRAYING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577690
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ETHYLENE PRODUCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577692
ELECTROLYSIS SYSTEM AND OPERATION METHOD THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+18.7%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1087 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month