Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/266,998

CONTROL APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, CONTROL METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 13, 2023
Examiner
SHIVERS, ASHLEY L
Art Unit
2477
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
NEC Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
527 granted / 607 resolved
+28.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
625
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
§103
48.7%
+8.7% vs TC avg
§102
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 607 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 11-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wang et al. (U.S. PGPub 2018/0220331), hereinafter referred to as Wang. Regarding claim 1, Wang discloses a control apparatus (controller; See [0012]) comprising: at least one memory (memory; See [0112]) storing instructions, and at least one processor (processor; See [0112]) configured to execute the instructions to: select a plurality of radio terminals that perform wireless communication through one of a plurality of antennas included in a wireless network at a predetermined timing (Three devices, labelled as terminals 32 and illustrated as mobile phones in the present embodiment, are operating within the DAS; See [0237]); determine combinations of the plurality of antennas and the selected plurality of radio terminals (During time slot 1, all of the antenna units 20 of cluster 1 are operating on the Wifi network, and so are providing Wifi network coverage; See [0245]); allocate radio resources for performing wireless communication at the predetermined timing, to the plurality of radio terminals (In time slot 1 of FIG. 3 the terminals 1, 2 and 3 (32a, 32b, 32c) are all operating on the Wifi network within the geographic area covered by the first cluster 24a; See [0245]); determine whether or not a criterion for satisfying service quality (WiFi vs LTE) determined for data to be transmitted or received by each radio terminal is met for all radio terminals capable of performing wireless communication through one of the plurality of antennas (The processor may be configured to use a geo-location traffic specification or geo-location traffic data to derive a traffic estimate, wherein a traffic estimate is an estimate of the location and traffic type (or network requirement, including QoS specifications) of a device. Tables 1 and 2 show the location and QoS requirements changing over time; See Tables 1 and 2, [0066] and [0291]); and select the plurality of radio terminals for which the criterion is not met from all the radio terminals (QoS-specific classifications such as User Priority for WLANs and QoS Class Identifiers in LTE systems may be taken into account and represented in the geo-location traffic specification. Meeting QoS-based requirements may be achieved by the antenna selection. Such QoS classifications may be handled and taken into account during antenna selection using methods known within the field to prioritise certain traffic which may be combined with or executed by embodiments of the present embodiment. Wherein certain devices are selected for LTE instead of WiFi based on their QoS, interpreted as the criterion not met for WiFi; See Tables 1-2 and [0138]). Regarding claim 2, Wang further discloses the control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to execute the instructions to select the radio terminals of the same number as the number of the antennas included in a predetermined area (in timeslot 1 there are three terminals and three antennas; See [0245]) or the radio terminals of the number smaller than the number of the antennas included in the predetermined area. Regarding claim 3, Wang further discloses the control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to execute the instructions to select the radio terminals of the number larger than the number of the antennas included in a predetermined area (In table 1, there are 14 terminals and three antennas; See Table 1). Regarding claim 11, Wang discloses a control method comprising: selecting a plurality of radio terminals that perform wireless communication through one of a plurality of antennas included in a wireless network at a predetermined timing (Three devices, labelled as terminals 32 and illustrated as mobile phones in the present embodiment, are operating within the DAS; See [0237]); determining combinations of the plurality of antennas and the selected plurality of radio terminals (During time slot 1, all of the antenna units 20 of cluster 1 are operating on the Wifi network, and so are providing Wifi network coverage; See [0245]); allocating radio resources for performing wireless communication at the predetermined timing, to the plurality of radio terminals (In time slot 1 of FIG. 3 the terminals 1, 2 and 3 (32a, 32b, 32c) are all operating on the Wifi network within the geographic area covered by the first cluster 24a; See [0245]); and when selecting the radio terminals, determining whether or not a criterion for satisfying service quality (WiFi vs LTE ) determined for data to be transmitted or received by each radio terminal is met for all radio terminals capable of performing wireless communication through one of the plurality of antennas (The processor may be configured to use a geo-location traffic specification or geo-location traffic data to derive a traffic estimate, wherein a traffic estimate is an estimate of the location and traffic type (or network requirement, including QoS specifications) of a device. Tables 1 and 2 show the location and QoS requirements changing over time; See Tables 1 and 2, [0066] and [0291]) and selecting the plurality of radio terminals for which the criterion is not met from all the radio terminals (QoS-specific classifications such as User Priority for WLANs and QoS Class Identifiers in LTE systems may be taken into account and represented in the geo-location traffic specification. Meeting QoS-based requirements may be achieved by the antenna selection. Such QoS classifications may be handled and taken into account during antenna selection using methods known within the field to prioritise certain traffic which may be combined with or executed by embodiments of the present embodiment. Wherein certain devices are selected for LTE instead of WiFi based on their QoS, interpreted as the criterion not met for WiFi; See Tables 1-2 and [0138]). Regarding claim 12, Wang discloses a non-transitory computer readable medium (computer readable medium; See [0233]) storing a program for causing a computer to execute: selecting a plurality of radio terminals that perform wireless communication through one of a plurality of antennas included in a wireless network at a predetermined timing (Three devices, labelled as terminals 32 and illustrated as mobile phones in the present embodiment, are operating within the DAS; See [0237]); determining combinations of the plurality of antennas and the selected plurality of radio terminals (During time slot 1, all of the antenna units 20 of cluster 1 are operating on the Wifi network, and so are providing Wifi network coverage; See [0245]); allocating radio resources for performing wireless communication at the predetermined timing, to the plurality of radio terminals (In time slot 1 of FIG. 3 the terminals 1, 2 and 3 (32a, 32b, 32c) are all operating on the Wifi network within the geographic area covered by the first cluster 24a; See [0245]); and when selecting the radio terminals, determining whether or not a criterion for satisfying service quality (WiFi vs LTE) determined for data to be transmitted or received by each radio terminal is met for all radio terminals capable of performing wireless communication through one of the plurality of antennas (The processor may be configured to use a geo-location traffic specification or geo-location traffic data to derive a traffic estimate, wherein a traffic estimate is an estimate of the location and traffic type (or network requirement, including QoS specifications) of a device. Tables 1 and 2 show the location and QoS requirements changing over time; See Tables 1 and 2, [0066] and [0291]) and selecting the plurality of radio terminals for which the criterion is not met from all the radio terminals (QoS-specific classifications such as User Priority for WLANs and QoS Class Identifiers in LTE systems may be taken into account and represented in the geo-location traffic specification. Meeting QoS-based requirements may be achieved by the antenna selection. Such QoS classifications may be handled and taken into account during antenna selection using methods known within the field to prioritise certain traffic which may be combined with or executed by embodiments of the present embodiment. Wherein certain devices are selected for LTE instead of WiFi based on their QoS, interpreted as the criterion not met for WiFi; See Tables 1-2 and [0138]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 4 appears to be novel and inventive because prior art fails to show or teach the control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein an allowable delay is determined for data to be transmitted or received by the radio terminals, and the at least one processor is further configured to execute the instructions to select the plurality of radio terminals that transmit or receive data for which a remaining period of the allowable delay is shorter than a predetermined period. Claims 5-7 appear to be novel and inventive because prior art fails to show or teach the control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to execute the instructions to select the plurality of radio terminals in accordance with a usage condition of a buffer for each of the radio terminals. Conclusion Additional prior art made of record and not relied upon but considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure can be found on the PTO-892 (Notice of References Cited) form. Any response to this action should be mailed to: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Hand delivered responses should be brought to: Customer Service Window Randolph Building 401 Dulany Street Alexandria, VA 22314 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ASHLEY L SHIVERS whose telephone number is (571)270-3523. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chirag Shah can be reached at 571-272-3144. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ASHLEY SHIVERS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2477 1/10/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 13, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593248
INFORMATION TRANSMISSION METHOD AND DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12580687
METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM FOR TRANSMITTING OR RECEIVING DATA CHANNEL AND CONTROL CHANNEL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12562852
METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12557166
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PATH SWITCH IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12557038
POWER HEADROOM REPORTING FOR UNCONFIGURED CARRIERS WITH UNCONFIGURED UPLINK
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.7%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 607 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month