Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/267,719

AXIAL FLUX MACHINE MANUFACTURE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 15, 2023
Priority
Dec 18, 2020 — GB 2020081.2 +2 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, DONGHAI D
Art Unit
3729
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Yasa Limited
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
671 granted / 890 resolved
+5.4% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
909
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
75.4%
+35.4% vs TC avg
§102
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
§112
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 890 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on February 27, 2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1, 3-11, and 14-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent 11,004,586 to Azar et al in view of U.S. Patent 6,443,143 to Ishida et al. Regarding claim 1, 3-7, 10-11, and 14-15, Azar et al disclose a method of manufacturing permanent magnets for axial flux permanent magnet machine (see Abstract), comprising: simultaneously cutting the magnet (100/200/etc. see Col. 2, lines 17-19) wherein each cut extends through a thickness of the permanent magnet from the first face to the second face (see Figs. 1-2) to form variety of cutting patterns (see Figs. 1-7) such as cut into the permanent magnet from one of the lateral edges and making a second array of cuts into the permanent magnet from the other lateral edge, such that cuts of the first and second arrays of cuts do not meet one another (claim 5, see Fig. 2); lines of the array of lines each extend in the direction of a line axis, and wherein moving the permanent magnet relative to the array of cutting lines further comprises translating at least one of the permanent magnet and the array of cutting lines along a second direction orthogonal to both the first direction and to the line axis at the same time as translating at least one of the permanent magnet and the array of cutting lines towards the other along the first direction (claim 6, see Fig. 16); making a single array of curved cuts from one of the lateral edges (claim 7); making a second array of curved cuts from the other of the lateral edges, wherein the curved cuts of the second array of curved cuts have a constant radial distance from one another along the length of each cut, and such that cuts of the first and second arrays of curved cuts do not meet one another and cuts of the first and second arrays of curved cuts are interlaced (see Fig. 2), except for mounting the permanent magnet in a magnet fixture in a cutting position relative to a cutting machine and moving the permanent magnet and the array of cutting lines relative to one another. Ishida et al teach a method for cutting permanent magnet by mounting the permanent magnet (24) in a magnet fixture (26/29) in a cutting position relative to a cutting machine (30) and moving the permanent magnet (24) and the array of cutting lines (32) relative to one another to simultaneously make an array of cuts across the permanent magnet (see Figs. 3) for improving product yields as well as optimizing the cutting process (see Col. 20, lines 54-65). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Azar et al by utilizing the process of cutting the permanent magnet as taught by Ishida for increasing the productivity as well as improving the quality of the permanent magnet. Note: the recitation that "magnets for an axial flux permanent magnet machine, the axial flux permanent magnet machine comprising: a stator comprising a set of coils disposed circumferentially at intervals about a machine axis, and a rotor mounted for rotation about the machine axis, the rotor bearing a set of permanent magnets disposed circumferentially at intervals about the machine axis, each permanent magnet extending in a plane perpendicular to the machine axis and having a first face towards the stator and a second, opposite face, and wherein the rotor and the stator are spaced apart along the machine axis to define a gap in which magnetic flux in the machine is generally in an axial direction" (lines 2-10 as a preamble) have not given patentable weight because it has been held that a preamble is denied the effect of a limitation where the claim is drawn to a structure (magnet) and the portion of the claim following the preamble is a self-contained description of the structure not depending for completeness upon the introductory clause. (see Kropa V. Robie, 88 USPQ 478) Regarding claims 8-9, Azar et al disclose rotating (flipping to cut the other side of the magnet) at least one of the permanent magnets and the array of cutting lines towards the other about a cutting axis and making a first array of curved cuts from one of the lateral edges, wherein the curved cuts of the first array of curved cuts have a constant radial distance from one another along the length of each cut (see Figs. 1-2). Claims 2, 13 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Azar/Ishida et al in view of U.S. Patent 8,823,235 to Watanabe et al. Azar/Ishida et al as applied and relied above do not disclose mounting the permanent magnet in the magnet fixture on the rotor. Watanabe et al teach the step of mounting the permanent magnet in the fixture of the rotor (see Fig. 1) such that the line axis is perpendicular to planes defined by the first and second faces (see Fig. 7) for obtaining the rotor having a high output and heat resistance (see Col. 4, lines 19-20). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to further modify the invention Azar/Ishida et al by utilizing the mounting of the magnet having slits thereon onto the fixture of the rotor in certain direction as taught by Watanabe et al for obtaining the rotor having a high output and heat resistance. Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Azar/Ishida et al in view of U.S. Patent 6,606,019 to Ohashi. Azar/Ishida et al do not disclose the step of filling the cuts with a non-magnetic material. Ohashi teaches the step of filling the cuts (2) in a permanent magnet (1) with a non-magnetic material (resin) for compensating the magnetic property as well as reinforcing the magnet (see Col. 6, lines 61-67). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to further modify the invention Azar/Ishida et al by filling the cuts with non-magnetic material as taught by Ohashi for reinforcing the magnet. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-15 and 17 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Prior art cited for the multiple wire cutting apparatus. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DONGHAI D NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-4566. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas J. Hong can be reached at 571-272-0993. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DN/ /DONGHAI D NGUYEN/June 27, 2026 Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 15, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Oct 15, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 31, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 30, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12660094
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR STACKING PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD ASSEMBLIES WITH SINGLE REFLOW
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651763
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR STACKING ELECTRODES
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12646738
MEANDERING CORRECTION DEVICE FOR ELECTRODE AND MEANDERING CORRECTION METHOD FOR ELECTRODE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12647004
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A STATOR OF AN AXIAL FLOW ELECTRIC MACHINE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12648086
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.1%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 890 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month