Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/268,227

TOTAL ENERGY EXPENDITURE MEASUREMENTS WITH H2 18O DEPLETED WATER

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 17, 2023
Examiner
QIAN, YUN
Art Unit
1738
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Jr-Aquaconsol GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allow Rate
588 granted / 1081 resolved
-10.6% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
60 currently pending
Career history
1141
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
44.3%
+4.3% vs TC avg
§102
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
§112
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1081 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Response to Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group I (claims 1-6) in the reply filed on 12/29/2025 is acknowledged. The reference of Marshall et al. discloses all limitations of the special technical feature recited in claim 1 including 2H2O enriched water and H218O depleted water, see the detailed discussion below. Since the special technical feature is disclosed by the prior art, that special technical feature does not provide a contribution over the prior art. Further, because PCT Rule 13. 2 states that a lack of unity exists when the special technical feature does not provide a contribution over the prior art, and because the examiner has disclosed references which teach this special technical feature, a proper assertion has been made that there exists lack of unity. See the detailed discussion below. Claims 9-13 are withdrawn from consideration. Claims 1-6 read on the elected group. Claims 7-8 and 14-14 previously have been cancelled. Claim Interpretation Regarding claim 3, according to the limitations recited in the instant claim 1, the H218O depleted water recited in claim 3 is consider as greater than 0% H218O. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The terms "enriched" and "depleted" in claims 1-6 are relative terms which render the claims indefinite. The terms are not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. The scope of these terms is impossible to determine because there is no indication of what complexities, and sizes are included/excluded. Appropriated corrections are required. Regarding claims 2-3, they fails to indicate whether the percentage are calculated based on a total composition, each component of starting reagents or final product, and percentage of volume, a weight or a molar. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Marshall et al. (Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00358 ). Regarding claim 1, Marshall et al. teach isotopic composition of tree Xylem water comprising δ18O xylem values are depleted in 18O, -2.8+/- 1.5‰, the δ 2H xylem values increased from initial source water values (natural abundance) to the labeled water value δ 2H =5.3 +/- 3.0‰ enriched (pages 7-8). Regarding claim 2, as discussed above, Marshall et al. teach the enriched 2H2O % greater than 0.02% as the instant claim (pages 7-8). Regarding claim 3, as discussed above, Marshall et al. teach the depleted H218O greater than 0.0% as the instant claim (pages 7-8). Regarding claim 5, as discussed above, Marshall et al. teach 2H2O enriched and H218O depleted in a single composition of xylem water as the instant claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4 and 6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims, and overcome the rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112(b). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YUN QIAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5834. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 10:00am-4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sally A Merkling can be reached at 571-272-6297. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. YUN . QIAN Examiner Art Unit 1732 /YUN QIAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1738
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 17, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600906
RED-LUMINESCENT PHOSPHOR WITH LONG AFTERGLOW AND FABRICATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595171
Co-production of Hydrogen and Sulfuric Acid by Partial Oxidation of Sulfur
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592423
PROCESS AND ITS PRODUCTS FOR SPENT LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES TREATMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589383
Spherical Titanium Silicalite Molecular Sieve Catalyst and Preparation Method Therefor
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12577126
METHOD FOR PRODUCING NICKEL PARTICLES, METHOD FOR PRODUCING NICKEL SULFATE, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR SECONDARY BATTERIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (+20.3%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1081 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month