Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/268,377

NOVEL COMPOUND AND ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAME

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jun 20, 2023
Priority
Mar 30, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0041274 +2 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, HAIDUNG D
Art Unit
1761
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
LG Chem, Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
403 granted / 619 resolved
At TC average
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
657
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
77.3%
+37.3% vs TC avg
§102
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
§112
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 619 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment This is responsive to applicant’s amendment filed 1/20/2026. Claims 1, 3-12 are pending. The Declaration under 37 CFR 1.132 filed 1/20/2026 is sufficient to overcome the rejection of claims 1-10 based upon Han et al (KR201700160701). The rejection of claims 1-10 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Han et al (KR201700160701) is therefore withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Newly added claim 11 recites limitations directed to L, L1 and L2, wherein are failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends. Claim 1 recites “L is a single bond, an unsubstituted C₆-60 arylene, or unsubstituted C2-60 heteroarylene containing at least one heteroatom selected from the group consisting of N, 0 and S; , L1 is a single bond, an unsubstituted C₆-60 arylene, or unsubstituted C2-60 heteroarylene containing at least one heteroatom selected from the group consisting of N, 0 and S and L2 is an unsubstituted C₆-60 arylene, or a substituted or unsubstituted C2-60 heteroarylene containing at least one heteroatom selected from the group consisting of N, 0 and S. The limitations of L, L1, and L2 which include substituted C₆-60 arylene, and substituted C2-60 heteroarylene broaden the breadth of these claim limitations. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claims 1, 3-10 and 12 are allowable over the prior art and for reasons set forth by applicant in the response filed 1/20/2026. The prior art fails to teach the claimed compounds and an organic light emitting device comprising one or more organic layers, which comprise said compounds. The compounds of the claimed invention exhibit improved properties, such as efficiency and lifespan, thereby providing superior effects in organic light emitting devices. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HAIDUNG D NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5455. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th: 10a-3p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Angela Brown-Pettigrew can be reached at 571-272-2817. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HAIDUNG D NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1761 5/6/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 20, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 02, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 13, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 20, 2026
Response Filed
May 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640364
High Capacity, Long Cycle Life Battery Anode Materials, Compositions and Methods
3y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635286
Physical Forms of MXene Materials Exhibiting Novel Electrical And Optical Characteristics
1y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624231
Organic Solvent Composition and Paint Composition Comprising the Same
4y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12622170
Fluorescent Organic Light Emitting Elements Having High Efficiency
2y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12583749
TITANIUM-ZIRCONIUM CO-DOPED CARBON-COATED LITHIUM IRON PHOSPHATE MATERIAL AND PRODUCTION METHOD AND USE THEREOF
2y 10m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+28.1%)
3y 0m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 619 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month