Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/269,487

METHOD FOR ACTIVATION OF LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Jun 23, 2023
Examiner
TAKEUCHI, YOSHITOSHI
Art Unit
1723
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
LG Energy Solution, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
518 granted / 789 resolved
+0.7% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+26.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
841
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
61.0%
+21.0% vs TC avg
§102
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§112
28.7%
-11.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 789 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-16 are presented for examination. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding independent claim 1, from which the other claims depend, said claim recites the limitation “the pressure” in “a pressurization process pressurizing the lithium secondary battery while changing the pressure.” There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim, noting that the “a pressure applied to the lithium secondary battery” in the activation process step of claim 1 is not required; and, the pressurization process may be before the activation process in which “a pressure” is recited. Regarding claim 6, said claim recites the limitation “the pressure” in “a first activation step in which the pressure applied to the lithium secondary battery during charging is 0.1 kgf/cm2 to 1.0 kgf/cm2.” There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim, noting that the “a pressure applied to the lithium secondary battery” in the activation process step of claim 1 is not required. Regarding claim 10, said claim recites the limitation “the pressure” in “in the first activation step and the second step of activation, activation step, the pressure applied to the lithium secondary battery during charging is 0.1 kgf/cm2 to 1.0 kgf/cm2.” There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim, noting that the “a pressure applied to the lithium secondary battery” in the activation process step of claim 1 is not required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1, 4-5, 7-8, and 13-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Guo et al (CN 109301335, published February 1, 2019). Regarding independent claim 1, Guo teaches a formation method for a soft-pack lithium-ion battery, said method providing improved cycle life, wherein said method including steps of: (i) a first step of Aging: after electrolyte filling is completed, leaving said lithium battery to stand at room temperature and pressure for 12-24 hours, and then leaving said battery to stand at high temperature and pressure for 4-8 hours; (ii) a second step of Setting Formation Temperature: raising temperature to a set temperature on a surface of a fixture, and keep said temperature constant at 40-65°C on said fixture; (iii) a third step of Setting Initial Pressure: setting an initial pressure of a formation fixture to 0.2-0.6 MPa and clamping said battery with a clamp; (iv) a fourth step of Performing Pulsed Pressure Massage on said battery: setting said clamp pressure to change in a pulsed manner with a cutoff time of 2-20 minutes; performing pulsed pressure massage on said battery—when a cutoff time is reached and clamp pressure change completes a last waveform, then said pressure massage is completed; then adjusting said clamp pressure linearly to increase or decrease to an initial pressure of the next step; (v) a fifth step of High-Temperature Pressure Conversion A: setting said clamp pressure on said battery to 0.2-0.8MPa, a charging current to 0.02-0.1C, and a first cutoff voltage to 3.1-3.5V; keeping said clamp pressure constant and charging at a constant current; stopping charging when a first cutoff voltage is reached; adjusting said clamp pressure linearly by increasing or decreasing it to an initial pressure of the next step; (vi) a sixth step of High-Temperature Pressure Transformation B: setting said clamp pressure on said battery to a pulsed waveform, a charging current to 0.2-0.5C, and a second cutoff voltage to 3.5-3.7V—during a charging process, said clamp pressure changes with a pulsed pressure waveform; a second constant current charging is completed when said clamp pressure changes to a second cutoff voltage and a last pressure waveform is completed, the current charging is then completed; said clamp pressure is then linearly increased or decreased to the initial pressure of the next step, wherein said pulsed waveform in said sixth step may be said triangular wave, trapezoidal wave, or half-sine wave, and waveform parameters include said minimum pressure of 0.2-0.6 MPa (2.0 - 6.1 kg-f/cm2), said maximum pressure of 0.4-0.8 MPa (4.1 – 8.2 kg-f/cm2), said a pressure rise time, said maximum pressure holding time, and said pressure fall time of 5-100 s, or said single pulse time of 10-300 s; (vii) a seventh step of High-Temperature Pressure Conversion C: set said clamp pressure on said battery to 0.2-0.8 MPa; the charging current to 0.5-1.0 C, and the final cutoff voltage to 3.7-4.3 V; keep said clamp pressure constant and charge at a constant current again until a final cutoff voltage is reached; charging is then complete; and, (viii) an eighth step of Transferring Charged battery to a Pressure Cooling Fixture for Pressure Cooling and Shaping: cool said fixture on said battery to a temperature of 5-20℃ and at a fixture pressure of 0.2-0.8MPa; let said battery stand for 10-30 minutes to complete formation, wherein a surface of said temperature of said fixture is kept constant at 40-65°C in the second through seventh steps wherein the temperature of said fixture surface is kept constant at 40-65°C in the second through seventh steps (e.g. ¶¶ 0002, 10-19, and 22), reading on “method for activating a lithium secondary battery,” said method comprising (1) said fifth, sixth, and seventh steps, wherein (1a) in said fifth step of High-Temperature Pressure Conversion A: setting said clamp pressure on said battery to 0.2-0.8MPa, said charging current to 0.02-0.1C, and said first cutoff voltage to 3.1-3.5V; keeping said clamp pressure constant and charging at said constant current; stopping charging when said first cutoff voltage is reached…; (1b) in said sixth step of High-Temperature Pressure Transformation B: setting said clamp pressure on said battery to said pulsed waveform, said charging current to 0.2-0.5C, and said second cutoff voltage to 3.5-3.7V—during said charging process, said clamp pressure changes with said pulsed pressure waveform; said second constant current charging is completed when said clamp pressure changes to said second cutoff voltage and said last pressure waveform is completed, the current charging is then completed…, wherein said pulsed waveform in said sixth step may be said triangular wave, trapezoidal wave, or half-sine wave, and waveform parameters include said minimum pressure of 0.2-0.6 MPa (2.0 - 6.1 kg-f/cm2), said maximum pressure of 0.4-0.8 MPa (4.1 – 8.2 kg-f/cm2), said a pressure rise time, said maximum pressure holding time, and said pressure fall time of 5-100 s, or said single pulse time of 10-300 s; and, (1c) in said seventh step of High-Temperature Pressure Conversion C: set said clamp pressure on said battery to 0.2-0.8 MPa; the charging current to 0.5-1.0 C, and the final cutoff voltage to 3.7-4.3 V; keep said clamp pressure constant and charge at a constant current again until a final cutoff voltage is reached; charging is then complete (e.g. supra), severably establishing a prima facie case of obviousness of the claimed ranges, see also e.g. MPEP § 2144.05(I), reading on “an activation process pressurizing and charging the lithium secondary battery, the activation process comprising n number of activation steps, wherein n is an integer of 3 or more” and wherein “each of the activation steps has different activation conditions that include one or more selected from a charge end state of charge (SOC), a charging speed (C-rate), and a pressure applied to the lithium secondary battery;” and, (2) severably at least one of said fourth, fifth, and sixth steps, wherein (2a) said fourth step of Performing Pulsed Pressure Massage on said battery: setting said clamp pressure on said battery to change in said pulsed manner with said cutoff time of 2-20 minutes; performing pulsed pressure massage on said battery…; then adjusting said clamp pressure linearly to increase or decrease to said initial pressure of the next step; (2b) in said fifth step of High-Temperature Pressure Conversion A: setting said clamp pressure on said battery to 0.2-0.8MPa;…stopping charging when said first cutoff voltage is reached; adjusting said clamp pressure linearly by increasing or decreasing it to said initial pressure of the next step; and, (2c) in said sixth step of High-Temperature Pressure Transformation B: setting said clamp pressure on said battery to said pulsed waveform…; the current charging is then completed; said clamp pressure is then linearly increased or decreased to said initial pressure of the next step (e.g. supra), establishing a prima facie case of obviousness of the claimed range, see also e.g. MPEP § 2144.05(I), reading on “a pressurization process pressurizing the lithium secondary battery while changing the pressure, the pressurization process occurring during one or more time periods selected from before the activation process, after the activation process, and between the activation steps.” Regarding claims 4 and 16, Guo teaches the method if claim 1, wherein said method comprises severably at least one of said fourth, fifth, and sixth steps, wherein (2a) said fourth step of Performing Pulsed Pressure Massage on said battery: setting said clamp pressure on said battery to change in said pulsed manner with said cutoff time of 2-20 minutes; performing pulsed pressure massage on said battery…; then adjusting said clamp pressure linearly to increase or decrease to said initial pressure of the next step; (2b) in said fifth step of High-Temperature Pressure Conversion A: setting said clamp pressure on said battery to 0.2-0.8MPa;…stopping charging when said first cutoff voltage is reached; adjusting said clamp pressure linearly by increasing or decreasing it to said initial pressure of the next step; and, (2c) in said sixth step of High-Temperature Pressure Transformation B: setting said clamp pressure on said battery to said pulsed waveform…; current charging is then completed; said clamp pressure is then linearly increased or decreased to said initial pressure of the next step (e.g. supra), reading on “the pressurization process is performed before the activation process, after the activation process, and between each of the activation steps” (claim 4) and “charging of the lithium secondary battery is not performed in the pressurization process” (claim 16) Regarding claim 5, Guo teaches the method if claim 1, wherein said temperature of said fixture surface is kept constant at 40-65°C in the second through seventh steps (e.g. supra), establishing a prima facie case of obviousness of the claimed range, see also e.g. MPEP § 2144.05(I), reading on “the activation process and the pressurization process are performed at a temperature of 40° C. to 70° C.” Regarding claim 7, Guo teaches the method if claim 1, wherein said method comprising said fifth and sixth steps, wherein (1a) in said fifth step of High-Temperature Pressure Conversion A: setting said clamp pressure on said battery to 0.2-0.8MPa (2.0 - 8.2 kg-f/cm2), said charging current to 0.02-0.1C, and said first cutoff voltage to 3.1-3.5V; keeping said clamp pressure constant and charging at said constant current; stopping charging when said first cutoff voltage is reached; adjusting said clamp pressure linearly by increasing or decreasing it to an initial pressure of the next step (e.g. supra), establishing a prima facie case of obviousness of the claimed range, see also e.g. MPEP § 2144.05(I), reading on “the activation steps include: a slow charging activation step with a charging speed of 0.01 C-rate to 0.5 C-rate” and “the slow charging activation step precedes the fast charging activation step;” and, (1b) in said sixth step of High-Temperature Pressure Transformation B: setting said clamp pressure on said battery to said pulsed waveform, said charging current to 0.2-0.5C, and said second cutoff voltage to 3.5-3.7V—during said charging process, said clamp pressure changes with said pulsed pressure waveform; said second constant current charging is completed when said clamp pressure changes to said second cutoff voltage and said last pressure waveform is completed, the current charging is then completed; said clamp pressure is then linearly increased or decreased to an initial pressure of the next step (e.g. supra), establishing a prima facie case of obviousness of the claimed range, see also e.g. MPEP § 2144.05(I), reading on “the activation steps include:…a fast charging activation step with a charging speed of 0.6 C-rate to 1.5 C-rate.” Regarding claim 8, Guo teaches the method if claim 1, wherein said method said method includes pulsed pressure waveforms and times, selected to expel air bubbles inside said electrolyte (e.g. ¶0021), but does not expressly teach a step of removing gas from inside said battery by “exhausting the gas outside the lithium secondary battery.” However, it is well known that oxygen in air is a mildly reactive compound, so it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to remove to outside the battery of Guo the air that was expelled from inside said electrolyte of Guo, in order to remove the oxygen therein from the battery to prevent unwanted chemical reactions. See also instant specification, at e.g. ¶¶ 0117-120. Regarding claim 13, Guo teaches the method if claim 1, wherein said method uses said formation fixture and applying pressure to said battery with said clamp (e.g. supra), wherein it is understood that a clamp is applied on outer surfaces of the object being clamped, reading on “the activation process and the pressurization process are performed by a formation device configured to pressurize outer surfaces of the lithium secondary battery.” Regarding claim 14, Guo teaches the method if claim 1, wherein said method includes said first step of Aging (i.e. prior to the other steps), of leaving said lithium battery to stand at room temperature and pressure for 12-24 hours, and then leaving said battery to stand at high temperature and pressure for 4-8 hours (e.g. supra), reading on “further comprising a pre-aging process aging the lithium secondary battery before the activation process.” Regarding claim 15, Guo teaches the method if claim 1, wherein said method includes said eighth step of Transferring Charged battery to a Pressure Cooling Fixture for Pressure Cooling and Shaping: cool said fixture to a temperature of 5-20℃ and at a fixture pressure of 0.2-0.8MPa; let said battery stand for 10-30 minutes to complete formation (e.g. supra), reading on “further comprising an aging process aging the lithium secondary battery after the activation process and pressurization process.” Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-3, 6 and 9-12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: none of the timely art of record teaches or suggests the claimed inventions of claims 2, 6, and 9, from which other claims depend, including the specifically claimed process steps of claim 1 and further: Regarding claim 2, from which claim 3 depends, the first pressurization step at the specifically claimed pressure range with the second pressure step, within the claimed pressure range, being sequentially performed, see also instant specification, at e.g. ¶¶ 0012-13, 59, and 63-68; Regarding claim 6, the first activation step at the specifically claimed pressure range with the second activation step, within the claimed pressure range, preceding the second activation step, see also instant specification, at e.g. ¶¶ 0016, 20, and 54-56 and 75; and, Regarding claim 9, from which claims 10-12 depend, the activation steps including the specifically claimed four activation steps, see also instant specification, at e.g. ¶¶ 0069-76 and 127-128. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YOSHITOSHI TAKEUCHI whose telephone number is (571)270-5828. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, TIFFANY LEGETTE-THOMPSON can be reached at (571)270-7078. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /YOSHITOSHI TAKEUCHI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 23, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603326
SOLID LITHIUM CELL, BATTERY COMPRISING SAID CELLS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING SAID BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603370
TRACTION BATTERY AND VEHICLE HAVING A TRACTION BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592436
BATTERY PACKAGING MATERIAL, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR, BATTERY, AND ALUMINUM ALLOY FOIL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586775
ANODE FOR SECONDARY BATTERY AND JELLY-ROLL TYPE ELECTRODE ASSEMBLY INCLUDING ANODE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586872
ELECTRODE ASSEMBLY, BATTERY CELL, BATTERY AND ELECTRIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+26.6%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 789 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month