Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 18/269,763

OPTICAL RECEPTACLE AND OPTICAL MODULE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 27, 2023
Priority
Dec 28, 2020 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2020049186
Examiner
KIANNI, KAVEH C
Art Unit
2874
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Enplas Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1073 granted / 1234 resolved
+19.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1260
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
60.5%
+20.5% vs TC avg
§102
13.5%
-26.5% vs TC avg
§112
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1234 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Detailed Action Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I species Figs 1-4 in response/amendment is acknowledged. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Information Disclosure Statement The prior art documents submitted by Applicant(s) in the information Disclosure Statement(s) have all been considered and made of record (note the attached copy of form(s) PTO-1449). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim(s) is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102( as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over . Claim(s) 1-2 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by KANKE S et al., WO 2014057666 A1. Regarding claim 1, Kanene teaches an optical receptacle 1 (se figs.1-16 and summary) configured to be disposed between a photoelectric conversion element 32 and an optical transmission member 133, the optical receptacle being configured to optically couple the photoelectric conversion element 32 with an end surface of the optical transmission member 133, PNG media_image1.png 512 450 media_image1.png Greyscale the optical receptacle comprising: a first optical surface configured to allow light emitted from the photoelectric conversion element to be incident thereon, or configured to emit, toward the photoelectric conversion element (clearly shown in at least figs.. 1 and 10; summary), light emitted from the end surface of the optical transmission member and traveling inside the optical receptacle; and a second optical surface configured to emit the light incident on the first optical surface toward the end surface of the optical transmission member, or configured to allow the light emitted from the end surface of the optical transmission member to be incident thereon, wherein when an origin is defined as an intersection point between the first optical surface and an optical axis of the first optical surface (clearly shown in at least figs.. 1 and 10; summary), a Z axis is defined as the optical axis of the first optical surface, an X axis is defined as an axis passing through the origin and perpendicular to the Z axis, and a Y axis is defined as an axis perpendicular to the Z axis and the X axis, the first optical surface is configured in such a way that when collimated light from an inside of the optical receptacle is incident on the first optical surface, a first focal point observed when viewed along a direction of the X axis and a second focal point observed when viewed along a direction of the Y axis are formed, the second focal point being observed closer to the first optical surface than the first focal point is (clearly shown in at least figs.. 1 and 10; see abstract or summary; also specification). 2. (Original) The optical receptacle according to claim 1, wherein the first optical surface is a convex lens surface in which a curvature on an XZ plane passing through the origin is greater than a curvature on a YZ plane passing through the origin clearly shown in at least figs..1-10; see specification; parag. 0031). . 4 (Currently amended) The optical receptacle according to claim 1, further comprising: a reflecting surface disposed between the first optical surface and the second optical surface, wherein a distance between the first focal point and the second focal point is more than 0 µ and 100 µ or less (see at least figs 10-16 and specification) Allowable Subject Matter Claim 3 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 3 is allowable because the prior art of record, taken alone or in combination, fails to disclose or render obvious wherein a distance between the first focal point and the second focal point is 100 µm or more and 180 µm or less in combination with the rest of the limitations of the base claim. Citation of Relevant Prior Art Prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. In accordance with MPEP 707.05 the following references are pertinent in rejection of this application since they provide substantially the same information disclosure as this patent does. These references are: US 12242103 B2 US 12216314 B2 US 11624879 B2 US 11480748 B2 WO 2022057113 A1 US 11163125 B2 US 10386579 B2 US 10345542 B2 US 20190187391 A1 US 10254536 B2 US 10241286 B2 US 20180356341 A1 US 10073227 B1 US 20180156989 A1 CN 104126139 B US 20170184802 A1 US 9690060 B2 US 9477053 B2 US 9417408 B2 US 20160202430 A1 JP 2016115721 A WO 2016067617 A2 US 9325445 B2 US 9312965 B2 US 9250401 B2 US 20150338590 A1 US 20150331211 A1 US 9151916 B2 US 20150131947 A1 US 20140346323 A1 US 20140328558 A1 US 20140270662 A1 US 8777497 B2 US 20140110570 A1 WO 2014057666 A1 US 20130266260 A1 US 8395722 B2 US 8235605 B2 US 20110152790 A1 US 20100278480 A1 US 7614801 B2 US 7463339 B2 US 7371012 B2 US 7349597 B2 US 7200294 B2 US 7171066 B1 US 7104703 B2 US 6939058 B2 JP 2005019639 A US 20030179993 A1 US 20030026540 A1 US 20020131180 A1 US 20020106149 A1 US 6257773 B1 US 5565978 A Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAVEH C KIANNI whose telephone number is (571)272-2417. The examiner can normally be reached on 9-19. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas Hollweg can be reached on571-270-1739. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAVEH C KIANNI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2874
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 27, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601881
OPTICAL FIBER CONNECTOR WITH IMPROVED FIXING PLATE
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596233
FIBER OPTIC ADAPTER
2y 9m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585069
OPTICAL CONNECTOR
3y 1m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585070
MULTI-GANG ADAPTER FOR HIGH-DENSITY ASSEMBLY
2y 10m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578527
RECONFIGURABLE OPTICAL INTERCONNECTS FOR CO-PACKAGED DEVICES INCLUDING PHOTONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS
12m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+11.2%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1234 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month