Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/270,030

COMPOSITE ABSORBENT BODY AND POLYMERIC ABSORBER

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 28, 2023
Examiner
FIGUEROA, JOHN J
Art Unit
1763
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Organo Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
902 granted / 1087 resolved
+18.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1111
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
36.6%
-3.4% vs TC avg
§102
31.9%
-8.1% vs TC avg
§112
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1087 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Applicant’s claim of priority as a 35 U.S.C. §371 national stage entry of PCT/JP2021/046314 filed Dec. 15, 2021, which claims priority to Japanese application JP2020-219829 filed Dec. 29, 2020, is hereby acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 1, and claims 2-15 that depend therefrom, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 1, line 2, recites “a hydrophilic continuous skeleton” and “continuous pore”. This claim language is indefinite because it is unclear from Applicant’s specification as to how the term “continuous” is to be interpreted, and as to how it modifies/limits the skeleton and pore components of the absorbent polymer, respectively. Particularly, it is confusing as to how a “single pore can be continuous”. Moreover, the phrase “local maximum value of a pore volume in a pore distribution curve” as recited in dependent claims 6-10 is also deemed indefinite. It is unclear from the present claims and specification as to how to ascertain this limitation in the claims. For purposes of the instant action, the phrase “continuous skeleton” component of the polymer skeleton has been interpreted as “a homopolymer”. Clarification of these terms/phrases is respectfully requested in a subsequent reply to this action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-12, 14 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §102(a)(1) as anticipated by Yoon (US 2019/0119452 A1 to Yoon et al., published April 25, 2019 and having an effective filing date of December 23, 2016). Yoon had been cited by Applicant in its Information Disclosure Statement filed June 10, 2025. Examiner notes that the phrase “monolithic absorbent” (present claim 13) has been defined in paragraph [0030] of the present specification, page 14, lies 9-15, as comprising “a crosslinked polymer of a (meth)acrylic acid ester and divinylbenzene before hydrolysis.” Yoon discloses a porous super absorbent polymer, and a method of preparing thereof, that exhibits excellent absorption performance and enhanced absorption rate due to its pore structure, wherein the porous super-absorbent polymer includes a base resin powder containing a cross-linked polymer of a water soluble ethylene-based unsaturated monomer containing acidic groups (hydrophilic/”continuous polymer”) that are at least partially neutralized, and an inorganic filler contained in the cross-linked structure of the cross-linked polymer, wherein the crossed link structure of the base resin powder includes a plurality of pores (“continuous”) having a sub-micron diameter scale and an interconnected pore structure in the form of an open channel in which 90% or more of the pores are connected to each other. The super-absorbent polymers are applied, inter alia, in sanitary products, hygiene products, and in water retaining/stop applications (abstract; [0002] to [0004]; [0008] to [0017]; [0061]; of Yoon). The water-soluble ethylene-based unsaturated monomer can comprise methacrylic acid, and the anionic surfactant can be sodium dodecanoate/alkyl carboxylate, which would provide a methacrylate/carboxylate compound having a sodium “hydrolysate” group (i.e., hydroxy/alkoxy) compound ([0045]; [0086] to [0088]; claims 3, 6 and 7 of Yoon, present claim 14). Yoon further discloses that its method provides a porous super-absorbent polymer having a higher porosity than previously known polymers and an enhanced pore structure, wherein the porous super-absorbent polymer hadan interconnected pore structure in the form of an open channel in which a plurality of pores can possess 90% or more of the pores are connected to each other, and high porosity such that the base resin powder possessing a pore volume fraction of 0.74 to 0.9, defined as a ratio of the volume of the plurality of pores to the total volume ([0031];to [0035]). In the examples, Yoon discloses samples wherein the pores have a maximum diameter of 5 to 400 microns wherein 90% or more are connected to each other (Examples 1-4 of Yoon). This disclosure is interpreted as meeting the limitation recited in present claim 1 of “a ratio of a pore volume of a pore … of the polymer adsorbent (having a pore radius of 1 micron or greater) … is 90% or more of a pore volume of the pore.” Thus, the instant claims are unpatentable over Yoon . Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN J FIGUEROA whose telephone number is (571)272-8916. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:30 am -6:00 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JOSEPH DEL SOLE can be reached on 571-272-1130. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN J FIGUEROA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1763 February 21, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 28, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599800
PROCESSES FOR REMOVING PERFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES AND REGENERATING AN ADSORBENT USED WITH SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599867
Fully Automated Direct Air Capture Carbon Dioxide Processing System
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595186
Method for Preparing Cuprous Chloride by High-value Utilization of Chloride Ion-containing Wasterwater
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590241
MODIFIED SILICA NANOPARTICLE AND METHODS OF SYNTHESIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583742
Hydrogen Production and Carbon Sequestration via High Temperature Cracking of Natural Gas In An Inductively Heated Fluidized Carbon Particle Bed
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+8.7%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1087 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month