Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/270,205

ELECTRIC BRAKE SYSTEM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jun 29, 2023
Examiner
MORRIS, DAVID R.
Art Unit
3616
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
HL Mando Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
417 granted / 508 resolved
+30.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
545
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
§102
35.0%
-5.0% vs TC avg
§112
29.9%
-10.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 508 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED CORRESPONDENCE Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 10 is dependent on claim 7, which was canceled. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103, which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-5, 8-17 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee (U.S. 2019/0367000) in view of Kim (WO 2020184967 A1). Regarding claim 1, Lee discloses (fig. 2) An electric brake system (abstract at least) comprising: a first block (100) in which a mechanical part (master cylinder unit at least) mechanically operated in conjunction with a brake pedal (120) is disposed; a second block (200) in which an electronic part electronically operated and controlled by an electronic control unit is disposed (pgh. 0034 at least, electrical signals control hydraulic block), wherein the second block is spaced apart from the first block (separate from one another, as shown); a connecting line (including 151, 152, 140, 210,136, etc.1) hydraulically connecting the first block and the second block to each other (as shown), wherein the mechanical part includes a master cylinder (110) equipped with a main reservoir (130) in which a pressurized medium is stored, a master piston (111) connected to the brake pedal, and a master chamber (113) whose volume is varied by a displacement of the master piston, the electronic part includes a hydraulic pressure supply device (300) generating hydraulic pressure by operating a hydraulic piston (320) by an electrical signal output in response to a displacement of the brake pedal (pgh. 0034) or an electrical signal output from the electronic control unit, and a hydraulic pressure control unit (400) equipped with a plurality of flow paths and valves (as shown within 410, 420) to control the hydraulic pressure transmitted from the hydraulic pressure supply device to the wheel cylinder (cylinders 10), a pedal simulator (250), and a sub reservoir (220) in which the pressurized medium is stored, the hydraulic pressure control unit includes a first hydraulic circuit (410) that controls hydraulic pressure transmitted to a first wheel cylinder and a second wheel cylinder (as shown), and the connecting line includes a first connecting line (151) connecting the master chamber and a front end of the first hydraulic circuit (as shown), a second connecting line (152) connecting the master chamber and the pedal simulator (indirectly at least, see response to arguments), a third connecting line (140) connecting the main reservoir and the sub reservoir. Lee does not appear to disclose the emergency module and structure thereof, and corresponding connecting line interconnecting the emergency module to the remaining modules/blocks. In the same field of endeavor of electronic brake control, Kim discloses an electric brake system including an emergency module (1600) downstream of the equivalent second block including valving 1520, the emergency module operating when the electronic part is inoperative (pgh. 00692: “The hydraulic auxiliary device 1600 is provided on a side of the third and fourth wheel cylinders 23 and 24 of the second hydraulic circuit 1520, and may generate and provide hydraulic pressure required for braking of the third and fourth wheel cylinders 23 and 24, when the hydraulic pressure supply device 1400 is inoperable due to a malfunction, etc.”) and providing hydraulic pressure to a wheel cylinder in an auxiliary manner (for FL and FR, as shown); the emergency module includes a hydraulic pressure auxiliary device (1610/1620) operating when the hydraulic pressure supply device is inoperative to provide the hydraulic pressure to the wheel cylinder (as discussed above), where the emergency module is connected to the first block and the second block via a connecting line (via lines through 1651 and 1652 at least). Kim further teaches a fourth connecting line (e.g. line behind 1641 and 1642) connecting the emergency module to the third connecting line (via sump 1200 at least. When viewed in combination, the recited components of Kim are connected to the sump, and the connecting lines all connect back to the sump as well, therefore all of these components are “connected” as claimed). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the electric brake system of Lee to include the emergency module of Kim in order to quickly and reliably perform emergency braking in the event of system abnormality or failure (see pgh. 0005 of Kim at least). It further would have been obvious to provide the fourth connecting line with providing the emergency module to allow the emergency module direct access to the sump, thereby ensuring emergency braking due to adequate supply of brake fluid for the pump. Regarding claim 2, Lee as modified by Kim teaches (fig. 1 Kim) the hydraulic pressure auxiliary device includes a first isolation valve (1651) and a second isolation valve (1652) allowing and blocking flows of the pressurized medium transmitted from the master cylinder and the hydraulic pressure supply device to the first wheel cylinder and a second wheel cylinder, respectively (as shown, interposed between wheel cylinders and master cylinder/hydraulic pressure supply device), a pump (1620) for pressurizing the pressurized medium, a motor (1610) for driving the pump, a first auxiliary hydraulic flow path (1631) for transmitting the pressurized medium pressurized by the pump to the first wheel cylinder, and a second auxiliary hydraulic flow path (1632) for transmitting the pressurized medium pressurized by the pump to the second wheel cylinder. Regarding claim 3, Lee as modified by Kim teaches (fig. 1 Kim) the hydraulic pressure auxiliary device further includes a first auxiliary dump flow path (1641) for discharging the pressurized medium applied to the first wheel cylinder and a second auxiliary dump flow path (1642) for discharging the pressurized medium applied to the second wheel cylinder. Regarding claim 4, Lee as modified by Kim teaches (fig. 1 Kim) the hydraulic pressure auxiliary device further includes: a first support valve (1631a) provided on the first auxiliary hydraulic flow path to control the flow of the pressurized medium and a second support valve (1632a) provided on the second auxiliary hydraulic flow path to control the flow of the pressurized medium; and a first discharge valve (1642b) provided on the first auxiliary dump flow path to control the flow of the pressurized medium and a second discharge valve (1642a) provided on the second auxiliary dump flow path to control the flow of the pressurized medium. Regarding claim 5, Lee further discloses (fig. 2) the hydraulic pressure control unit further includes a second hydraulic circuit (420) that controls hydraulic pressure transmitted to a third wheel cylinder and a fourth wheel cylinder (as shown). Regarding claim 8, Lee as modified by Kim teaches (fig. 1 Kim) the hydraulic pressure auxiliary device is provided between the first and second wheel cylinders and the first hydraulic circuit (as shown, between wheel cylinders 23,24 and first hydraulic circuit 1520). Regarding claim 9, Lee further discloses (fig. 2) the master cylinder includes a first master piston (111) connected to the brake pedal, a first master chamber (113) whose volume is varied by a displacement of the first master piston, a second master piston (112) provided to be displaceable by hydraulic pressure of the first master chamber, and a second master chamber (114) whose volume is varied by a displacement of the second master piston, the first connecting line connects the first master chamber and the front end of the first hydraulic circuit (151 as shown), and the second connecting line connects the second master chamber and a front end of the pedal simulator (152 as shown and discussed above). Regarding claim 10, Lee as modified by Kim further discloses (fig. 2) the fourth connecting line (e.g. line behind 1641 and 1642 connected to sump 1200) connects an inlet of the pump and the first and second auxiliary dump flow paths (see Kim, pump inlet and first and second auxiliary dump flow paths 1641,1642 are connected to the sump 1200) to the third connecting line (When viewed in combination, the recited components of Kim are connected to the sump, and the connecting lines all connect back to the sump as well, therefore all of these components are “connected” as claimed). Regarding claim 11, Lee further discloses (fig. 2) the electronic part further includes a dump controller (e.g. 333) provided between the hydraulic pressure supply device and the sub reservoir to control the flow of the pressurized medium (as shown, provided between 300 and chamber 224 of sub reservoir 220). Regarding claim 12, Lee further discloses (fig. 2) the hydraulic pressure supply device includes a first pressure chamber (311) provided in front of the hydraulic piston and a second pressure chamber (312) provided behind the hydraulic piston, and the electronic part further includes: a first sub reservoir flow path (331) connecting the sub reservoir and the first pressure chamber; and a second sub reservoir flow path (332) connecting the sub reservoir and the second pressure chamber. Regarding claim 13, Lee further discloses (fig. 2) the dump controller includes a first dump valve (333) provided on the first sub reservoir flow path, a second dump valve (334) provided on the second sub reservoir flow path, and a third dump valve (336) provided in parallel to the second dump valve on the second sub reservoir flow path (as shown). Regarding claim 14, Lee further discloses (fig. 2) the electronic part further includes a third sub reservoir flow path (231) connecting the sub reservoir and a rear end of the first hydraulic circuit, and a fourth sub reservoir flow path (232) connecting the sub reservoir and a rear end of the second hydraulic circuit. Regarding claim 15, Lee further discloses (fig. 2) the electronic part further includes a simulation flow path connected to a rear end of the pedal simulator (path extending out the back of simulator 250), and the simulation flow path is connected to the sub reservoir (as shown, via 231) by joining the fourth sub reservoir flow path (both paths are “joined” via common connection to the sub reservoir, and they “join together” to return fluid to the sub reservoir, so therefore these two paths are “joined”). Regarding claim 16, Lee further discloses (fig. 2) the electronic part further includes a backup flow path (242) connecting any one of the main reservoir and the sub reservoir to a front end of the second hydraulic circuit (as shown, ultimately connected to main reservoir), a first cut valve (243) provided in the first connecting line to control the flow of the pressurized medium, and a second cut valve (244) provided on the backup flow path to control the flow of the pressurized medium. Regarding claim 17, Lee further discloses (fig. 2) the first hydraulic circuit includes a first inlet valve (411) and a second inlet valve (412) for controlling the flow of the pressurized medium supplied from the hydraulic pressure supply device to the first wheel cylinder and the second wheel cylinder, respectively, and a first outlet valve (415) and a second outlet valve (416) for controlling flows of the pressurized medium discharged from the first wheel cylinder and the second wheel cylinder, respectively, the second hydraulic circuit includes a third inlet valve (421) and a fourth inlet valve (422) for controlling the flow of the pressurized medium supplied from the hydraulic pressure supply device to the third wheel cylinder and the fourth wheel cylinder, respectively, and a third outlet valve (425) and a fourth outlet valve (426) for controlling the flow of the pressurized medium discharged from the third wheel cylinder and the fourth wheel cylinder, respectively, the pressurized medium discharged through the first and second outlet valves is supplied to the third sub reservoir flow path (231, as shown), and the pressurized medium discharged through the third and fourth outlet valves is supplied to the fourth sub reservoir flow path (232, as shown). Regarding claim 19, Lee as modified by Kim teaches the first and second isolation valves are provided as normal-open-type solenoid valves that are open in normal times and operate to be closed upon receiving an electrical signal (Kim pgh. 0079-0080). Regarding claim 20, Lee as modified by Kim teaches the first and second support valves and the first and second discharge valves are provided as normal-closed-type solenoid valves that are closed in normal times and operate to open upon receiving an electrical signal (Kim pgh. 0073-0076). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 1/6/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The remarks on pages 11-12 contend that Lee and Kim fail to disclose the second connecting line (152) being connecting the master chamber and the pedal simulator, as now recited in claim 1, because instead the second connecting line is connected to the second hydraulic circuit (420). While this is true, the second connecting line (152) is also connected to additional elements of the system at least indirectly, and the claims do not preclude such a construction due to the usage of the word “connecting” within the present application. For example, claim 1 recites, inter alia, “a first connecting line connecting the master chamber and a front end of the first hydraulic circuit”. Shown in fig. 1 for example is a first connecting line 1310 that is ultimately connected to the first hydraulic circuit 1230 albeit indirectly, due to the presence of cut valve 1311 disposed within the connecting line. As such, use of the word “connecting” within the present application does not necessarily convey a direct connection, but rather a connection that could include intermediate valves. In the same manner, line 152 of Lee is “connecting” the master chamber and the pedal simulator 250 via intermediate valves 244, 372, 243 and 255. Accordingly, the fluid line 152 is readable upon the second connecting line as presently claimed. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID MORRIS whose telephone number is (571)270-3595. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday; 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Siconolfi can be reached at (571) 272-7124. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID R MORRIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3616 1 Based on the present disclosure, the “connecting line” 1300 includes multiple separate lines 1310, 1320, 1330, 1340. Accordingly, the broadest reasonable interpretation of “a connecting line” includes a plurality of separate lines. 2 See US 2022/0176928 for paragraph citations, which is the US equivalent document of WO 2020/184967 A1
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 29, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 06, 2026
Response Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Final Rejection — §103
Apr 01, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597546
SOLENOID, SOLENOID VALVE, AND SHOCK ABSORBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595021
BRAKE DEVICE FOR HUMAN-POWERED VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594919
Trailer Brake Control System
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12578004
SHOCK ABSORBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571440
BRAKE APPARATUS FOR VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+13.7%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 508 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month