DETAILED ACTION
Claims 1-16 and 18 are currently pending in the instant application. Claims 1-16 are rejected. Claim 18 is withdrawn from consideration as being for non-elected subject matter.
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Election/Restrictions
Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-16 and the species:
PNG
media_image1.png
228
250
media_image1.png
Greyscale
in the reply filed on 22 December 2025 acknowledged.
According to MPEP 803.02, the examiner has determined whether the elected species is allowable. Applicants’ elected species does not appear allowable. However, in order to advance prosecution, the search and examination has been extended to the compounds:
PNG
media_image2.png
294
316
media_image2.png
Greyscale
,
PNG
media_image3.png
286
304
media_image3.png
Greyscale
, and
PNG
media_image4.png
268
280
media_image4.png
Greyscale
which are not allowable
Claims 1-16 have been examined to the extent that they are readable on the elected embodiment, the elected species and the above mentioned compounds.
Specification
The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities:
The Preliminary Amendment filed 29 June 2023 is objected to under 35 U.S.C. 132(a) because it introduces new matter into the disclosure. 35 U.S.C. 132(a) states that no amendment shall introduce new matter into the disclosure of the invention. The added material which is not supported by the original disclosure is as follows: “the content of each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.”
MPEP 211.02 and MPEP 201.06(c)(IV) state the following in regard to “Incorporation by Reference” and PCT Rule 20.6, Rule 20.7 and Rule 4.18 are directed specifically to International applications:
MPEP 211.02, in-part
For applications filed on or after September 21, 2004, a claim under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or 120 and 37 CFR 1.78 for benefit of a prior-filed provisional application, nonprovisional application, international application designating the United States, or international design application designating the United States that was present on the filing date of the continuation or divisional application, or the nonprovisional application claiming benefit of a prior-filed provisional application, is considered an incorporation by reference of the prior-filed application as to inadvertently omitted material, subject to the conditions and requirements of 37 CFR 1.57(b). The purpose of 37 CFR 1.57(b) is to provide a safeguard for applicants when all or a portion of the specification and/or drawing(s) is (are) inadvertently omitted from an application. See MPEP § 201.06 and 217. However, applicants are encouraged to provide in the specification an explicit incorporation by reference statement to the prior-filed application(s) for which benefit is claimed under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or 120 if applicants do not wish the incorporation by reference to be limited to inadvertently omitted material pursuant to 37 CFR 1.57(b). See 37 CFR 1.57(c). See also MPEP §§ 217 and MPEP § 608.01(p).
When a benefit claim is submitted after the filing of an application, and the later-filed application as filed did not incorporate the prior-filed application by reference, applicant cannot add an incorporation by reference statement of the prior application. An incorporation by reference statement added after an application’s filing date is not effective because no new matter can be added to an application after its filing date (see 35 U.S.C. 132(a)). See Dart Indus. v. Banner, 636 F.2d 684, 207 USPQ 273 (C.A.D.C. 1980). See also 37 CFR 1.57(b).
MPEP 201.06(c)(IV), in-part
201.06(c) 37 CFR 1.53(b) and 37 CFR 1.63(d) Divisional-Continuation Procedure [R-07.2015]
IV. INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
An applicant may incorporate by reference the prior application by including, in the continuing application-as-filed, an explicit statement that such specifically enumerated prior application or applications are “hereby incorporated by reference.” The statement must appear in the specification. See 37 CFR 1.57(c) and MPEP § 608.01(p). The inclusion of this incorporation by reference statement will permit an applicant to amend the continuing application to include subject matter from the prior application(s), without the need for a petition provided the continuing application is entitled to a filing date notwithstanding the incorporation by reference. For applications filed prior to September 21, 2004, the incorporation by reference statement may appear in the transmittal letter or in the specification. Note that for applications filed prior to September 21, 2004, if applicants used a former version of the transmittal letter form provided by the USPTO, the incorporation by reference statement could only be relied upon to add inadvertently omitted material to the continuation or divisional application.
An incorporation by reference statement added after an application’s filing date is not effective because no new matter can be added to an application after its filing date (see 35 U.S.C. 132(a)). If an incorporation by reference statement is included in an amendment to the specification to add a benefit claim under 35 U.S.C. 120 after the filing date of the application, the amendment would not be proper. When a benefit claim under 35 U.S.C. 120 is submitted after the filing of an application, the reference to the prior application cannot include an incorporation by reference statement of the prior application. See Dart Indus. v. Banner, 636 F.2d 684, 207 USPQ 273 (C.A.D.C. 1980).
20.6 Confirmation of Incorporation by Reference of Elements and Parts
(a) The applicant may submit to the receiving Office, within the applicable time limit under Rule 20.7 , a written notice confirming that an element or part is incorporated by reference in the international application under Rule 4.18 , accompanied by:
(i) a sheet or sheets embodying the entire element as contained in the earlier application or embodying the part concerned;
(ii) where the applicant has not already complied with Rule 17.1(a) , (b) or (b-bis) in relation to the priority document, a copy of the earlier application as filed;
(iii) where the earlier application is not in the language in which the international application is filed, a translation of the earlier application into that language or, where a translation of the international application is required under Rule 12.3(a) or 12.4(a) , a translation of the earlier application into both the language in which the international application is filed and the language of that translation; and
(iv) in the case of a part of the description, claims or drawings, an indication as to where that part is contained in the earlier application and, where applicable, in any translation referred to in item (iii).
(b) Where the receiving Office finds that the requirements of Rule 4.18 and paragraph (a) have been complied with and that the element or part referred to in paragraph (a) is completely contained in the earlier application concerned, that element or part shall be considered to have been contained in the purported international application on the date on which one or more elements referred to in Article 11(1)(iii) were first received by the receiving Office.
(c) Where the receiving Office finds that a requirement under Rule 4.18 or paragraph (a) has not been complied with or that the element or part referred to in paragraph (a) is not completely contained in the earlier application concerned, the receiving Office shall proceed as provided for in Rule 20.3(b)(i) , 20.5(b) , 20.5(c) , 20.5bis(b) or 20.5bis(c) , as the case may be.
20.7 Time Limit
(a) The applicable time limit referred to in Rules 20.3(a) and (b) , 20.4 , 20.5(a) , (b) and (c) , 20.5bis(a) , (b) and (c) , and 20.6(a) shall be:
(i) where an invitation under Rule 20.3(a) , 20.5(a) or 20.5bis(a) , as applicable, was sent to the applicant, two months from the date of the invitation;
(ii) where no such invitation was sent to the applicant, two months from the date on which one or more elements referred to in Article 11(1)(iii) were first received by the receiving Office.
(b) Where neither a correction under Article 11(2) nor a notice under Rule 20.6(a) confirming the incorporation by reference of an element referred to in Article 11(1)(iii)(d) or (e) is received by the receiving Office prior to the expiration of the applicable time limit under paragraph (a), any such correction or notice received by that Office after the expiration of that time limit but before it sends a notification to the applicant under Rule 20.4(i) shall be considered to have been received within that time limit.
4.18 Statement of Incorporation by Reference
Where the international application, on the date on which one or more elements referred to in Article 11(1)(iii) were first received by the receiving Office, claims the priority of an earlier application, the request may contain a statement that, where an element of the international application referred to in Article 11(1)(iii)(d) or (e) , or a part of the description, claims or drawings referred to in Rule 20.5(a) , or an element or part of the description, claims or drawings referred to in Rule 20.5bis(a) is not otherwise contained in the international application but is completely contained in the earlier application, that element or part is, subject to confirmation under Rule 20.6 , incorporated by reference in the international application for the purposes of Rule 20.6 . Such a statement, if not contained in the request on that date, may be added to the request if, and only if, it was otherwise contained in, or submitted with, the international application on that date.
The instant application is a 371 application which has an International filing date of 30 December 2021. The incorporation by reference statement is being added by way of a Preliminary Amendment filed 29 June 2023, which is after the instant application's International filing date of 30 December 2021. Therefore, the “incorporation by reference” statement being added to the instant specification by way of the Preliminary Amendment is deemed new matter.
Applicant is required to cancel the new matter in the reply to this Office Action.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claim(s) 1-3, 5, 6, and 8-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US Patent No. 9,682,968.
US Patent No. 9,682,968 discloses the compounds
PNG
media_image3.png
286
304
media_image3.png
Greyscale
and
PNG
media_image4.png
268
280
media_image4.png
Greyscale
on columns 166 and 167. These compounds correspond to the formula (I) of the instant claims:
PNG
media_image5.png
204
194
media_image5.png
Greyscale
wherein L is O and R1 is C1-5alkyl, specifically, CH2CH3, which is substituted by 1, 2, or 3 Ra groups wherein Ra is H; and R2 and R3 are each H. While instant claim 1 has the proviso that “provided that R2 and R3 are not simultaneously selected from H when R1 is selected from unsubstituted C1-5alkyl”, it is noted that claim 1 defines R1 as being optionally substituted with 1, 2, or 3 Ra wherein each Ra can be H. Therefore, R1 as ethyl falls under R1 being substituted by 1, 2, or 3 Ra, wherein Ra is H, which anticipates the instantly claimed invention. Additionally, column [0073] defines “substituted” to include hydrogen variables. In regards to claim 11, which defines R4 as H and CH3, it is noted that claim 11 does not require R4 to be present as L does not have to be NR4 and the claim therefore covers wherein L is O.
(a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claim(s) 1-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by US Pre-Grant Publication 2024/0287034, which is a 371 of PCT/US2022/032042 filed June 3, 2022, which claims priority to US Provisional No. 63/196339, filed June 3, 2021.
US Pre-Grant Publication 2024/0287034 discloses the compound of example 41:
PNG
media_image6.png
350
292
media_image6.png
Greyscale
which is identical to applicant’s elected species:
PNG
media_image1.png
228
250
media_image1.png
Greyscale
. The compound
PNG
media_image6.png
350
292
media_image6.png
Greyscale
of the prior art corresponds to the formula (I) of the instant claims:
PNG
media_image5.png
204
194
media_image5.png
Greyscale
wherein L is a single bond; R1 is C3 cycloalkyl; specifically
PNG
media_image7.png
68
46
media_image7.png
Greyscale
, and R2 and R3 are both H. US Provisional No. 63/196339, filed June 3, 2021, provides the compound of example 33:
PNG
media_image8.png
168
146
media_image8.png
Greyscale
which provides support for the compound of example 41 of US Pre-Grant Publication 2024/0287034. . In regards to claim 11, which defines R4 as H and CH3, it is noted that claim 11 does not require R4 to be present as L does not have to be NR4 and the claim therefore covers wherein L as a single bond.
Applicant cannot rely upon the certified copy of the foreign priority application to overcome this rejection because a translation of said application has not been made of record in accordance with 37 CFR 1.55. When an English language translation of a non-English language foreign application is required, the translation must be that of the certified copy (of the foreign application as filed) submitted together with a statement that the translation of the certified copy is accurate. See MPEP §§ 215 and 216.
Claim(s) 1-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by US Pre-Grant Publication 2023/0286947, which is a 371 of PCT/CN2021/110859, filed August 5, 2021.
US Pre-Grant Publication 2023/0286947 provides the compound
PNG
media_image9.png
292
334
media_image9.png
Greyscale
on page 11. The compound of the prior art corresponds to the formula (I) of the instant claims:
PNG
media_image5.png
204
194
media_image5.png
Greyscale
wherein L is O; R1 is -C1alkyl-C3cycloalkyl; specifically:
PNG
media_image10.png
50
68
media_image10.png
Greyscale
and R2 and R3 are each H. In regards to claim 11, which defines R4 as H and CH3, it is noted that claim 11 does not require R4 to be present as L does not have to be NR4 and the claim therefore covers wherein L is O.
Applicant cannot rely upon the certified copy of the foreign priority application to overcome this rejection because a translation of said application has not been made of record in accordance with 37 CFR 1.55. When an English language translation of a non-English language foreign application is required, the translation must be that of the certified copy (of the foreign application as filed) submitted together with a statement that the translation of the certified copy is accurate. See MPEP §§ 215 and 216.
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REBECCA L ANDERSON whose telephone number is (571)272-0696. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday from 6am-2pm.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrew Kosar can be reached at 571-272-0913. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format.
For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/REBECCA L ANDERSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1626 ____________________ 21 January 2026
Rebecca Anderson
Primary Examiner
Art Unit 1626, Group 1620
Technology Center 1600