Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/270,594

BATTERY MODULE AND BATTERY PACK INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 30, 2023
Examiner
HOLBROOK, MIA KEILANI
Art Unit
1724
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
LG Energy Solution, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 0% of cases
0%
Career Allow Rate
0 granted / 0 resolved
-65.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
14
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
§103
62.5%
+22.5% vs TC avg
§102
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
§112
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 0 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on June 30, 2023, September 12, 2024, February 25, 2025 and November 13, 2025 has been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 6-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by U.S. Pre-Grant Publication 2013/0209852 (IDS dated 09/12/2024), hereinafter Schletterer. Regarding claim 1, Schletterer teaches a battery module (‘electrochemical energy store’ [0047]) comprising: a battery cell stack (‘cell stacks’ [0058]) in which a plurality of battery cells (Fig 7: 2) are stacked; a module frame (Fig 7: 1) that surrounds the battery cell stack (Fi 7: 2); and a fire extinguishing member (Fig 7: 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, and 17 [0048] [0058-9]) interposed between the plurality of battery cells (Fig 7: 2), wherein the plurality of battery cells (Fig 7: 2) includes a first battery cell (most left battery cell 2) and a second battery cell (second from the left battery cell 2) that are adjacent to each other, and wherein the fire extinguishing member (Fig 7: 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, and 17 [0048] [0058-9]) extends over an upper surface of the first battery cell (Fig 7: most left extinguishing agent additive 16), in a space between the first battery cell and the second battery cell (Fig 7: most left extinguishing agent additive 10), and under a lower surface of the second battery cell in a zigzag shape (Fig 7: 17 under second from the left battery cell 2). PNG media_image1.png 495 684 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 6, Schletterer teaches the battery module (‘electrochemical energy store’ [0047]) according to claim 1, wherein: the fire extinguishing member (Fig 7: 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, and 17 [0048] [0058-9]) contacts an upper part of the module frame (fig. 7: 1) and a lower part of the module frame (Fig 7: 9 and 15). Regarding claim 7, Schletterer teaches the battery module (‘electrochemical energy store’ [0047]) according to claim 1, wherein: the fire extinguishing member (Fig 7: 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, and 17 [0048] [0058-9]) contacts the upper surface of the first battery cell (Fig 7: most left 16) and the lower surface of the second battery cell (Fig 7: second from the left 17). Regarding claim 8, Schletterer teaches the battery module (‘electrochemical energy store’ [0047]) according to claim 1, wherein: the fire extinguishing member (Fig 7: 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, and 17 [0048] [0058-9]) adheres (extinguishing agent has a gel-like, particularly a viscous consistency’ [0051]) an upper part of the module frame and the upper surface of the first battery cell (Fig 7: most left 16), and adheres (extinguishing agent has a gel-like, particularly a viscous consistency’ [0051]) a lower part of the module frame and the lower surface of the second battery cell (Fig 7: 9). Regarding claim 9, Schletterer teaches the battery module (‘electrochemical energy store’ [0047] [0048] [0058-9]) according to claim 1, wherein: the fire extinguishing member (Fig 7: 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, and 17) adheres (extinguishing agent has a gel-like, particularly a viscous consistency’ [0051]) the first battery cell and the second battery cell to each other (Fig 7: most left 10). Regarding claim 10, Schletterer teaches the battery module (‘electrochemical energy store’ [0047]) according to claim 1, wherein: the fire extinguishing member (Fig 7: 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, and 17 [0048] [0058-9]) is interposed between a side surface part of the module frame and an outermost battery cell of the battery stack (Fig 7: 7 and 8). Regarding claim 11, Schletterer teaches the battery module (‘electrochemical energy store’ [0047]) according to claim 10, wherein: the fire extinguishing member (Fig 7: 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, and 17 [0048] [0058-9]) adheres (extinguishing agent has a gel-like, particularly a viscous consistency’ [0051]) the side surface part of the module frame to the outermost battery cell (Fig 7: 7 and 8). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-5 and 12-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Pre-Grant Publication 2013/0209852 (IDS dated 09/12/2024), hereinafter Schletterer as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of U.S Pre-Grant Publication 2018/0248160, hereinafter Lee. Regarding claim 2-5, Schletterer teaches an electrical energy store having a housing 1 that contains a battery cell stack (Fig 7: 2s) and fire extinguishing members disposed around the battery cells (Fig 7: 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, and 17 [0048] [0058-9]) (instant claim 1). These fire extinguishing members are contained within housing member 1 and have a gel-like, viscous consistency (Schletterer, [0051]) (instant claim 4). However, Schletterer fails to teach a double-sided adhesive case for fire extinguishing agents that melts above a predetermined temperature. Lee teaches a battery pack 400 consisting of battery cells 10 in which a fire retarding material or fire extinguishing agent 60 may be covered with a thin film or a membrane 92 and adhesive 90 (reads on case) (instant claim 2) of a material which is apt to melt in the event of fires (instant claim 3), and the adhesive 90 of the case is able to be attached to the inside of the module case. (Lee, [0067], Fig 5). Therefore, it would have been obvious to the ordinarily skilled artist before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the double-sided adhesive case for a fire extinguishing agents of Lee in Schletterer because ‘when a thin film or membrane 92 [case] of a material which is apt to melt in the event of fires is peeled off or melted, the fire retarding material or fire extinguishing agent 60 is discharged or diffused toward the cell 10’ (Lee, [0068]). This prevents and stops fires from spreading quickly, minimizing secondary damage such as battery explosions (Lee, [0069]). Regarding claims 12 and 13, Schletterer teaches an electrical energy store having a housing 1 that contains a battery cell stack (Fig 7: 2s) and fire extinguishing members disposed around the battery cells (Fig 7: 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, and 17 [0048] [0058-9]) (instant claim 1). The first battery cell and second battery cell are provided in a plurality of pairs (‘adjacent pairs of electrochemical cells,’ Claim 24) and the fire extinguishing member (Fig 7: 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, and 17 [0048] [0058-9]) extends between the first battery cell and second battery cell of each of the plurality of pairs (‘the extinguishing agent or extinguishing agent additive is arranged as an intermediate element between adjacent pairs,’ Claim 24) (instant claim 13). However, Schletterer does not teach a battery pack that comprises of the battery module. Lee teaches a battery pack 400 consisting of battery cells 10 in which a fire retarding material or fire extinguishing agent 60 may be covered with a thin film or a membrane 92 and adhesive 90 (reads on case) (instant claim 2) of a material which is apt to melt in the event of fires (instant claim 3), and the adhesive 90 of the case is able to be attached to the inside of the module case. (Lee, [0067], Fig 5). Therefore, it would have been obvious to the ordinarily skilled artist before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the battery module of Schletterer in the battery pack of Lee because battery packs are ‘the most essential component of a hybrid electric vehicle or electric vehicle’ (Lee, [0004]) but have ‘risks of fire explosion caused by over-charging and over-current’ (Lee, [0006]). One of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate a battery module in a battery pack that consists of fire extinguishing agents to put out the fires that electric vehicles are at risk of. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Mia K Holbrook whose telephone number is (571)272-9253. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Miriam Stagg can be reached at (571) 270-5256. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /M.K.H./Examiner, Art Unit 1724 /MIRIAM STAGG/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1724
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 30, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
Grant Probability
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 0 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month