Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/270,659

METHOD FOR SIMULTANEOUSLY DIAGNOSING ERWINIA CAROTOVORA AND PHYTOPHTHORA INFESTANS IN SOIL BY USING SEMI-QUANTITATIVE LATERAL FLOW IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jun 30, 2023
Priority
Jan 04, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0000507 +1 more
Examiner
OGUNBIYI, OLUWATOSIN A
Art Unit
1645
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Abc Circle Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
582 granted / 920 resolved
+3.3% vs TC avg
Strong +42% interview lift
Without
With
+42.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
972
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
46.4%
+6.4% vs TC avg
§102
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
§112
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 920 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-2 and 5 have been amended. Claims 1-5 are pending and are under examination. Specification The amendment to the abstract of the disclosure is acknowledged. Claim Objection/Rejection Withdrawn The objection to claim 1 because of informalities is withdrawn in view of the amendment to the claim. The rejection of claims 1-5 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, is withdrawn in view of the amendment to the claim. New Claim Rejection(s) Based on Amendment The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the enablement requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and/or use the invention. The specification lacks deposit information for hybridoma cell line producing rat anti-Erwinia 5E10 antibody and for the hybridoma cell line producing rat anti-Phytophthora 1C6 antibody. Because it is not clear that the hybridomas these hybridomas are known and publicly available or the exact hybridoma producing the exact rat anti-Erwinia 5E10 antibody and rat anti-Phytophthora 1C6 antibody can be reproducibly isolated from nature without undue experimentation and because the claims requires hybridoma producing these antibodies, a suitable deposit for patent purposes is required. Exact replication of these hybridoma is an unpredictable event. If a deposit has been made under the provisions of the Budapest Treaty, filing of an affidavit or declaration by applicant or assignees or a statement by an attorney of record who has authority and control over the conditions of deposit over his or her signature and registration number stating that the deposit has been accepted by an International Depository Authority under the provisions of the Budapest Treaty, that all restrictions upon public access to the deposit will be irrevocably removed upon the grant of a patent on this application and that the deposit will be replaced if viable samples cannot be dispensed by the depository is required. This requirement is necessary when deposits are made under the provisions of the Budapest Treaty as the Treaty leaves this specific matter to the discretion of each State. Amendment of the specification to recite the date of deposit and the complete name and full street address of the depository is required. If deposits have not been made under the provisions of the Budapest Treaty, then in order to certify that the deposits comply with the criteria set forth in 37 CFR §1.801-1.809, assurances regarding availability and permanency of deposits are required. Such assurance may be in the form of an affidavit or declaration by applicants or assignees or in the form of a statement by an attorney of record who has the authority and control over the conditions of deposit over his or her signature and registration number averring: (a) during the pendency of this application, access to the deposits will be afforded to the Commissioner upon request; (b) all restrictions upon the availability to the public of the deposited biological material will be irrevocably removed upon the granting of a patent on this application; (c) the deposits will be maintained in a public depository for a period of at least thirty years from the date of deposit or for the enforceable life of the patent of or for a period of five years after the date of the most recent request for the furnishing of a sample of the deposited biological material, whichever is longest; and (d) the deposits will be replaced if they should become nonviable or non-replicable. In addition, a deposit of biological material that is capable of self-replication either directly or indirectly must be viable at the time of deposit and during the term of deposit. Viability may be tested by the depository. The test must conclude only that the deposited material is capable of reproduction. A viability statement for each deposit of a biological material not made under the Budapest Treaty must be filed in the application and must contain: 1) The name and address of the depository; 2) The name and address of the depositor; 3) The date of deposit; 4) The identity of the deposit and the accession number given by the depository; 5) The date of the viability test; 6) The procedures used to obtain a sample if the test is not done by the depository; and 7) A statement that the deposit is capable of reproduction. As a possible means for completing the record, applicant may submit a copy of the contract with the depository for deposit and maintenance of each deposit. Applicant's attention is directed to In re Lundack, 773 F.2d. 1216, 227 USPQ 90 (CAFC 1985) and 37 CFR §1.801-1.809 for further information concerning deposit practice. Status of Claims Claims 1-5 are rejected. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OLUWATOSIN A OGUNBIYI whose telephone number is (571)272-9939. The examiner can normally be reached IFP. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Allen can be reached at 5712703497. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OLUWATOSIN A OGUNBIYI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1645
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 30, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §112
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 18, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 27, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12612436
VARIANTS OF HLYA AND USES THEREOF
3y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12605482
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF PREPARING AND DELIVERING OOCYST SOLUTIONS
5y 3m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12606612
MULTIVALENT DNA ANTIBODY CONSTRUCTS AND USE THEREOF
4y 2m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12605429
PROTEINS HAVING PNEUMOCOCCAL CAPSULE DEGRADING ACTIVITY AND METHODS OF USE
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12599549
TREATMENT OF MODERATE TO VERY SEVERE GLABELLAR LINES AND LATERAL CANTHAL LINES
5y 10m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+42.1%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 920 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month