Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/270,957

METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SIDELINK COMMUNICATION, AND DEVICE THEREFOR

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Jul 05, 2023
Examiner
BLANTON, JOHN D
Art Unit
2466
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Kt Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
784 granted / 1014 resolved
+19.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1062
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.8%
+12.8% vs TC avg
§102
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1014 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 10/28/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. On page 6-8 of the Applicant’s Response, Applicant: “In contrast, the presently claimed invention expressly requires that a UE receives a sidelink RRC message from another UE, and that the message includes both DRX configuration information and latency range (sl-LatencyBoundCSI-Report) information for sidelink CSI reporting. Agiwal contains no disclosure, suggestion, or teaching of such a sidelink RRC message-either in structure or in function-and therefore fails to anticipate or render obvious the claimed features. Accordingly, Applicant respectfully believes that the Examiner's reliance on Agiwal paragraphs [0110] and [0154] is misplaced“. Examiner respectfully disagrees with Applicant’s argument. Agiwal expressly discloses a “UE sharing its SL DRX configuration with peer UE using RRC signaling” (p110). Agiwal expressly discloses “the value of the timer (e.g., sl-CSI-ReportTimer) is the same as the latency requirement of the SL-CSI reporting indicated by sl-Laten-cyBoundCSI-Report configured by RRC, sl-LatencyBoundCSI-Report value is sent by UE 1 to UE2 using RRC signaling” (p154). Thus Agiwal expressly discloses the limitation “wherein the sidelink RRC message includes information for configuring the sidelink DRX and latency range (sl-LatencyBoundCSI-Report) information for a sidelink channel status information (CSI) report”. In view of the above discussions the rejection of claims 16, 17, 19-21, 23-27, and 29-34 still stands. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 16-17, 19-21, 23-27, 29-31, and 33 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)(a)(2) as being anticipated by Agiwal et al. (US 2024/0049341) (“Agiwal”). For claims 16 and 26; Agiwal discloses: receiving a sidelink radio resource control (RRC) message from another UE (paragraph 110: Each UE of a unicast connection may share its SL DRX configuration with peer UE using RRC signaling); configuring sidelink discontinuous reception (DRX) using information included in the sidelink RRC message (paragraph 162: SL DRX for the unicast connection between UE 1 and UE 2 may be configured (S920). For example, each UE may obtain parameters associated with DRX); and monitoring reception of sidelink control information using the sidelink DRX configuration (paragraph 156-157: UE 2 generates SL MAC PDU carrying CSI report MAC CE, and [0157] UE 2 transmit SCI 1(i.e. 1.sup.st stage SCI) in PSCCH resource, transmits SCI 2 (i.e., 2.sup.nd stage SCI) in PSSCH resource and SL MAC PDU in PSSCH resource); wherein the sidelink RRC message includes information for configuring the sidelink DRX and latency range (sl-LatencyBoundCSI-Report) information for a sidelink channel status information (CSI) report (paragraph 154: the value of the timer (e.g., sl-CSI-ReportTimer) is the same as the latency requirement of the SL-CSI reporting indicated by sl-Laten-cyBoundCSI-Report configured by RRC, sl-LatencyBoundCSI-Report value is sent by UE 1 to UE2 using RRC signaling). For claims 17, 25, and 27; Agiwal discloses: wherein the sidelink DRX configuration is configured for each pair of source and destination for a sidelink unicast mode (paragraph 73: A PC5-RRC connection is a logical connection between two UEs for a pair of Source and Destination Layer-2 IDs which is considered to be established after a corresponding PC5 unicast link is established as specified in TS 23.287. There is one-to-one correspondence between the PC5-RRC connection and the PC5 unicast link). For claims 19 and 29; Agiwal discloses: wherein the monitoring reception of the sidelink control information is performed at an active time set to be between a time of transmission of a sidelink channel status information request to the another UE and a time of reception of the sidelink channel status information report in an event of receiving the sidelink channel status information report (paragraph 172-175: UE 1 may monitor PSCCH/PSSCH while the timer (e.g., SL CSI Report Timer) is running, even if none of On duration timer/inactivity timer/retransmission timer is running (S970). In an embodiment, active time for SL DRX operation may include the time while On duration timer is running; inactivity timer is running; or retransmission timer is running; or the timer (e.g., SL CSI Report Timer) is running). For claims 20 and 30; Agiwal discloses: wherein monitoring reception of the sidelink control information is performed at an active time set to be during a latency range (sl-LatencyBoundCSI-Report) for the sidelink channel status information report in an event of not receiving the sidelink channel status information report (paragraph 154: the value of the timer (e.g., sl-CSI-ReportTimer) is the same as the latency requirement of the SL-CSI reporting indicated by sl-Laten-cyBoundCSI-Report configured by RRC, sl-LatencyBoundCSI-Report value is sent by UE 1 to UE2 using RRC signaling) (paragraph 172-175: UE 1 may monitor PSCCH/PSSCH while the timer (e.g., SL CSI Report Timer) is running, even if none of On duration timer/inactivity timer/retransmission timer is running (S970). In an embodiment, active time for SL DRX operation may include the time while On duration timer is running; inactivity timer is running; or retransmission timer is running; or the timer (e.g., SL CSI Report Timer) is running). For claims 21; Agiwal discloses: transmitting a sidelink radio resource control (RRC) message to a UE (paragraph 110: Each UE of a unicast connection may share its SL DRX configuration with peer UE using RRC signaling); receiving a sidelink channel status information (CSI) request from the UE (paragraph 164-165: UE 1 may transmit PSCCH to UE 2 (S940). PSCCH may include information on resources for PSSCH. [0165] UE 1 may transmit PSSCH to UE 2 (S950) based on the information on resources for PSSCH. UE 1 may send a CSI request to UE 2. The CSI Request may be included in stage 2 (i.e. 2nd stage) SCI); and controlling an operation according to an active time according to sidelink DRX configuration of the UE (paragraph 154: the value of the timer (e.g., sl-CSI-ReportTimer) is the same as the latency requirement of the SL-CSI reporting indicated by sl-Laten-cyBoundCSI-Report configured by RRC, sl-LatencyBoundCSI-Report value is sent by UE 1 to UE2 using RRC signaling) (paragraph 172-175: UE 1 may monitor PSCCH/PSSCH while the timer (e.g., SL CSI Report Timer) is running, even if none of On duration timer/inactivity timer/retransmission timer is running (S970). In an embodiment, active time for SL DRX operation may include the time while On duration timer is running; inactivity timer is running; or retransmission timer is running; or the timer (e.g., SL CSI Report Timer) is running). For claims 23; Agiwal discloses: wherein an active time is set to be between a time of transmission of a sidelink channel status information request and a time of reception of a sidelink channel status information report if the sidelink channel status information report is transmitted according to the sidelink channel status information request (paragraph 172-175: UE 1 may monitor PSCCH/PSSCH while the timer (e.g., SL CSI Report Timer) is running, even if none of On duration timer/inactivity timer/retransmission timer is running (S970). In an embodiment, active time for SL DRX operation may include the time while On duration timer is running; inactivity timer is running; or retransmission timer is running; or the timer (e.g., SL CSI Report Timer) is running). For claims 24; Agiwal discloses: wherein an active time is set to be during a latency range (sl-LatencyBoundCSI-Report) for the sidelink channel status information report in an event of not transmitting the sidelink channel status information report according to the sidelink channel status information request during the latency range (sl-LatencyBoundCSI-Report) for the sidelink channel status information report (paragraph 154: the value of the timer (e.g., sl-CSI-ReportTimer) is the same as the latency requirement of the SL-CSI reporting indicated by sl-Laten-cyBoundCSI-Report configured by RRC, sl-LatencyBoundCSI-Report value is sent by UE 1 to UE2 using RRC signaling) (paragraph 172-175: UE 1 may monitor PSCCH/PSSCH while the timer (e.g., SL CSI Report Timer) is running, even if none of On duration timer/inactivity timer/retransmission timer is running (S970). In an embodiment, active time for SL DRX operation may include the time while On duration timer is running; inactivity timer is running; or retransmission timer is running; or the timer (e.g., SL CSI Report Timer) is running). For claims 31 and 33; Agiwal discloses: wherein the another UE performs an operation according to an active time according to the sidelink DRX configuration of the UE (paragraph 154: the value of the timer (e.g., sl-CSI-ReportTimer) is the same as the latency requirement of the SL-CSI reporting indicated by sl-Laten-cyBoundCSI-Report configured by RRC, sl-LatencyBoundCSI-Report value is sent by UE 1 to UE2 using RRC signaling) (paragraph 172-175: UE 1 may monitor PSCCH/PSSCH while the timer (e.g., SL CSI Report Timer) is running, even if none of On duration timer/inactivity timer/retransmission timer is running (S970). In an embodiment, active time for SL DRX operation may include the time while On duration timer is running; inactivity timer is running; or retransmission timer is running; or the timer (e.g., SL CSI Report Timer) is running). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 32 and 34 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Agiwal in view of Agiwal et al. (US 12,245,319) (“Agiwal2”). For claim 32 and 34; Agiwal discloses the subject matter in claim 16 as described above in the office action. Agiwal does not expressly disclose, but Agiwal2 from similar fields of endeavor teaches: wherein the monitoring reception of the sidelink control information starts or restarts a sidelink DRX inactivity timer at a first symbol after receiving the sidelink control information in an event that the sidelink control information indicates sidelink transmission includes a source L1 ID and a destination L1 ID to be received by the UE (column 15, lines 36-67: UE operation for handling SL DRX inactivity timer is as follows: If 2nd stage SCI indicating a new transmission is received on PSSCH (or SCI indicating a new transmission is received): if the scheduled TB is associated to unicast: if the Destination ID field in the SCI is equal to X least significant bits (e.g. X can be 16 or any other value depending on size (in bits) of Destination ID field in the SCI i.e., if size of Destination ID field in the SCI is P bits then X is equal to P, P is an integer) of any of the Source Layer-2 ID(s) of the UE and Source ID field in the SCI is equal to Y least significant bits (e.g. Y can be 8 or any other value depending on size (in bits) of Source ID field in the SCI i.e., if size of Source ID field in the SCI is K bits then X is equal to K, K is an integer) of any of the Destination Layer-2 ID(s) of the UE for unicast communication: UE starts or restarts corresponding sl-drx-InactivityTimer (if configured) in the first symbol after the end of the 2nd stage SCI reception (alternately starts or restarts corresponding sl-drx-InactivityTimer in the first slot after the end of the 2nd stage SCI reception)). Thus it would have been obvious to the person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to implement the signaling as described by Agiwal2 in the SL DRX monitoring as described by Agiwal. The motivation is to improve power usage. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kim (US 2021/0044956); Kim discloses the HARQ process ID on the SL channel, bit information representing one or more ACK/NACK feedback information, or L1 ID and/or L2 ID of the source, destination, or destination group may be included in the corresponding MAC CE. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN D BLANTON whose telephone number is (571)270-3933. The examiner can normally be reached 7am-6pm EST, Mon-Thu. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Faruk Hamza can be reached at 571-272-7969. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN D BLANTON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2466
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 05, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Oct 28, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12587929
METHOD AND APPARATUS SUPPORTING RANDOM ACCESS TRANSMISSIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574416
MONITORING OVERLAY NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574943
METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING PHYSICAL DOWNLINK CONTROL CHANNEL AND DEVICE FOR SAME IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12563533
RESOURCE ALLOCATION METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556337
BANDWIDTH PART MAPPING FOR CONTROL AND DATA CHANNELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+8.1%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1014 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month