Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/271,508

SUPPORT BODY AND LITHIUM ION SECONDARY BATTERY

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 10, 2023
Examiner
JELSMA, JONATHAN G
Art Unit
1722
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Nippon Kodoshi Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
627 granted / 902 resolved
+4.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
941
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
52.7%
+12.7% vs TC avg
§102
20.9%
-19.1% vs TC avg
§112
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 902 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Summary This is the initial Office Action based on Application 18/271,508 filed 07/10/2023 by Kenta Morimoto, Kentaro Ogawa, and Masahiro Kuroiwa. Claims 1-4 are currently pending and have been fully considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a2) as being anticipated by SHIGEMATSU (US 2023/0193534 A1. With respect to claim 1. SHIGEMATSU teaches a non-woven fabric for supporting a solid electrolyte (paragraph 0016). The air permeability of the non-woven fabric is between 250-1500 cm3/cm2/sec (paragraph 0048) with specific examples falling within 155-400 cm3/cm2/sec, which is taken to be between 9-24 L/cm2/min (see Table 1). The thickness of the non-woven fabric is between 10-30 microns (paragraph 0057). The density of the non-woven fabric is between 0.15-0.32 g/cc (paragraph 0058). With respect to claim 2. SHIGEMATSU teaches the non-woven fiber includes the binder fibers, such as a crimpled composite fiber in an amount of 80% by mass (Table 1). With respect to claims 3-4. SHIGEMATSU teaches an all solid state lithium battery including a solid electrolyte layer (paragraph 0017). Such a solid electrolyte layer is supported on the non-woven fabric (paragraph 0029). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over SHIGEMATSU (JP 2020024860 A) in view of HOTTA (US 2020/0295403 A1). With respect to claim 1. SHIGEMATSU teaches a solid electrolyte carrying nonwoven fabric (abstract and paragraph 0010). The thickness of the nonwoven fabric is between 10-30 microns (paragraph 0060). The density of the nonwoven fabric is between 0.25 g/cm3 and 0.35 g/cm3 (paragraph 0061). SHIGEMATSU does not explicitly teach the air permeability of the non-woven sheet. However, SHIGEMATSTU teaches the other properties of the nonwoven sheet as claimed. HOTTA teaches a nonwoven fabric which may include a gelled electrolyte (paragraph 0044). The separator which may be a nonwoven fabric may have an air permeability coefficient of 5x10-14 m2 (paragraph 0142). The permeability coefficient is chosen in order to control the amount of the electrolyte in the separators (paragraph 0142). At the time the invention was filed one having ordinary skill in the art would have been able to control the air permeability of the nonwoven fabric of SHIGEMATSU to be within the desired range as a matter of routine optimization, as HOTTA teaches that such a parameter is utilized for that very purpose, and therefore achieving the claimed air permeability in the range of 1-50 L/cm3/min may be achieved as a matter of routine optimization. With respect to claim 2. SHIGEMATSU teaches a content of heat-resistant fiber being between 2-40 mass% (paragraph 0010) which is an overlapping range with the claimed amount of 20-80 mass%. See MPEP 2144.05(I). In the case where the claimed ranges "overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art" a prima facie case of obviousness exists. In re Wertheim, 541 F.2d 257, 191 USPQ 90 (CCPA 1976); In re Woodruff, 919 F.2d 1575, 16 USPQ2d 1934 (Fed. Cir. 1990). With respect to claims 3-4. SHIGEMATSU teaches a solid state battery composed of the solid electrolyte layer (paragraph 0014). The solid electrolyte layer then includes the nonwoven fabric for support (paragraph 0026). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JONATHAN G JELSMA whose telephone number is (571)270-5127. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday 9:00 AM to 4:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Niki Bakhtiari can be reached at (571)272-3433. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JONATHAN G JELSMA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1722
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 10, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597672
BATTERY MODULE AND BATTERY PACK INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12586853
BATTERY PACK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586843
THERMAL MANAGEMENT COMPONENT, THERMAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, BATTERY, AND ELECTRIC APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586869
SEPARATOR, BATTERY CELL, BATTERY, AND ELECTRIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580262
BATTERY MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+14.9%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 902 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month