Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 18/271,532

SPACE EVALUATION SYSTEM

Final Rejection §101§112
Filed
Jul 10, 2023
Priority
Jan 15, 2021 — JP 2021-005128 +1 more
Examiner
FUELLING, MICHAEL
Art Unit
3992
Tech Center
3900
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
44%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 44% of resolved cases
44%
Career Allowance Rate
89 granted / 202 resolved
-15.9% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+31.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 2m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
210
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
§103
35.7%
-4.3% vs TC avg
§102
10.2%
-29.8% vs TC avg
§112
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 202 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §112
DETAILED ACTION Note: Claim 10 should have been identified as new too. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The phrase “not being originally present in the air of the target space” does not provide a reasonably clear boundary for the claimed negative control sample. The term “originally” is indefinite because it is unclear what point in time is being used as the reference point. It is unclear whether “originally” refers to: the time before the sample was collected; the time before the collecting device was introduced into the target space; the time before analysis of the sample; the time before contamination occurred; or some other time. It is also unclear whether the limitation applies to the negative control sample, to each contaminating material represented by the sample, or to a portion of the material represented by the sample. Furthermore, claim 1 recites that the negative control sample “represents contaminating material that contaminates the air in the target space,” while also requiring that the negative control sample have not been originally present in that air. The claim does not clearly explain whether the contaminating material is introduced into the target space, introduced into the collected sample, introduced by the collecting device, introduced by the analysis device, or otherwise associated with the sampling process. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The recited units are found to be directed to software per se. Response to Arguments Applicant was non-responsive to the above part of the outstanding 101 rejection. New claims 11 and 12 endeavor to add a sampler and/or some device while such hardware is not actually positively recited as part of the system yet. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL FUELLING whose telephone number is (571)270-1367. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL FUELLING/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3992
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 10, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §112
Oct 05, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §101, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12727792
NON-INVASIVE BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12721559
PHYSICOCHEMICAL-SENSING ELECTRONIC SKIN FOR STRESS RESPONSE MONITORING
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12694987
METHOD OF ESTIMATING GLUCOSE METABOLIC CAPACITY
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12646125
COMPUTER SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE DEVICES FOR OPTIMAL HOME RENTALS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 9218592
COMPUTER SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING DATA RELATING TO NURSE INTERVENTION PROGRAM DECISIONS
2y 3m to grant Granted Dec 22, 2015
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
44%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (+31.1%)
4y 2m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 202 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month