Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/271,647

ELECTRICAL DEVICE, DEVICE CONNECTION PART FOR THE ELECTRICAL DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING AN ELECTRICAL DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 10, 2023
Priority
Feb 01, 2021 — DE 10 2021 102 252.5 +1 more
Examiner
HARCUM, MARCUS E
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Harting Electronics GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
509 granted / 569 resolved
+21.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
586
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
89.2%
+49.2% vs TC avg
§102
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
§112
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 569 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 08/07/2023 and 08/14/2023 was filed after the mailing date of the application on 07/10/2023. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, at least one circuit carrier having electrical conducting tracks of claim 1; all of claim 3 and provide an injection-molding tool for device connection parts of claim 18 must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: line 6 recites, “the mating contacts,” claim should be amended to recite –mating contacts--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 2, 4, 5, 7-10 and 12-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over De Carolis et al. [US 2009/0023320] in view of Genau [US 2013/0137310]. Regarding claim 1, Carolis discloses an electrical device, comprising a device housing (fig. 6; 112, 19) and at least one circuit carrier (fig. 6; 86) having electrical conducting tracks (Par [038] Ln 18-22; 86 will naturally have traces/tracks that will electrically connect 26 to 88) and a plurality of plug connectors (figs. 4 and 6; receptacles that contain 26 and 110), each of which comprises a contact carrier (individual receptacles) having a plurality of uninterrupted contact chambers (110) and a plurality of electrical plug contacts (26), wherein the plug contacts (26) at their terminal end (end of 26), respectively comprise a terminal region (end of 26 that physically n electrically connect to 86) at which they are connected, in an electrically conductive manner, to the conducting tracks (traces/tracks of 86) of the circuit carrier (86), and wherein the plug contacts (26) are respectively accommodated, at least partially, in one contact chamber (110) of the respective contact carrier (individual receptacles) and are retained therein, wherein the electrical device (fig. 5; 18) further comprises a device connection part (fig. 6; 19), which forms a housing part of the device housing (19, 112), wherein the device connection part (19) is configured integrally with the contact carriers (individual receptacles). Regarding claim 9, Carolis discloses a device connection part (19) for the electrical device (18) as claimed in claim 1 one of the preceding claims, wherein the device connection part (19) comprises the above-mentioned contact carriers (individual receptacles) and is formed of an electrically insulating material (Par [0060] Ln. 1-3; plastic), wherein each of the contact carriers (individual receptacles) comprises the above-mentioned plurality of uninterrupted contact chambers (110), into which the electrical plug contacts (26) are insertable for bonding, on the terminal side (side of 26 that mates with 86), with conducting tracks (traces/tracks of 86) of the circuit carrier (86) of the electrical device (18) in an electrically conductive manner, wherein the device connection part (19) comprises an essentially planar terminal section (fig. 4; 24) onto which the contact carriers (individual receptacles) are molded (Par [0060] Ln. 1-3; this suggest that 19 is made from plastic and therefore is molded). Regarding claims 1 and 9, Carolis does not explicitly disclose the plug contacts, at their plug-in end, respectively comprise a plug-in region for plug-in side connection to the mating contacts of a mating connector which is plugged into the respective plug connector [claim 1]; for the contact-connection thereof, on the plug-in side, with electrical mating contacts of a mating connector which is plugged or pluggable into the respective plug connector [claim 9]. Regarding claims 1 and 9, Genau teaches the plug contacts (fig. 1; 30), at their plug-in end (fig. 1; 31 area), respectively comprise a plug-in region (31) for plug-in side connection to the mating contacts (Par [0085] Ln 7; contacts of the counter plug) of a mating connector (Par [0085] Ln 7; counter plug) which is plugged into the respective plug connector (fig. 8; 1); for the contact-connection thereof, on the plug-in side (fig. 1; 31 area), with electrical mating contacts (contacts of the counter plug) of a mating connector (counter plug) which is plugged or pluggable into the respective plug connector (1). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to incorporate the plug contacts, at their plug-in end, respectively comprise a plug-in region for plug-in side connection to the mating contacts of a mating connector which is plugged into the respective plug connector and for the contact-connection thereof, on the plug-in side, with electrical mating contacts of a mating connector which is plugged or pluggable into the respective plug connector as suggested by Genau for the benefit of improving a known aspect of mating connectors together. Regarding claim 2, Carolis modified by Genau has been discussed above. Carolis discloses wherein the circuit carrier (86) is fastened to the device connection part (19). Regarding claim 4, Carolis modified by Genau has been discussed above. Carolis discloses wherein the circuit carrier (86) is a circuit board (86). Regarding claim 5, Carolis modified by Genau has been discussed above. Carolis discloses wherein the said plurality of plug connectors (receptacles that contain 26 and 110) is at least four, such that at least four contact carriers (four individual receptacles) are integrally configured with the device connection part (19). Regarding claim 7, Carolis modified by Genau has been discussed above. Carolis discloses wherein the electrical device (18) is a terminal device for a data network (fig. 1, 18 transfers power and communications). Regarding claim 8, Carolis modified by Genau has been discussed above. Carolis discloses wherein the device housing (18) comprises a housing base part (fig. 6; 112) which, in combination with the device connection part (19), forms the device housing (112, 19). Regarding claim 10, Carolis modified by Genau has been discussed above. Carolis discloses wherein the contact carriers (individual receptacles) are configured in the terminal section (24) in a recessed arrangement (see fig. 4). Regarding claim 12, Carolis modified by Genau has been discussed above. Carolis discloses wherein the device connection part (19) forms at least one outer wall of the device housing (19, 112). Regarding claim 13, Carolis modified by Genau has been discussed above. Carolis discloses wherein the device connection part (19), at the terminal section (24), further comprises at least one edge (fig. 4; edge of 24 connecting 41) or curvature, by means of which the device connection part (19) additionally forms at least one part (41) of at least one sidewall (41) of the device housing (19, 112), such that the device connection part (19) forms an upper shell of the device housing (19, 112). Regarding claim 14, Carolis modified by Genau has been discussed above. Carolis discloses wherein the device connection part (19) comprises the plug contacts (26) which are secured in the contact chambers (110) of the contact carriers (individual receptacles). Regarding claim 15, Carolis modified by Genau has been discussed above. Carolis discloses wherein the device connection part (19) comprises a fastening apparatus (fig. 6; 94) for fastening the circuit carrier (86) to the device connection part (19). Regarding claim 16, Carolis modified by Genau has been discussed above. Carolis discloses wherein the fastening apparatus (94) is comprised of a plurality of fastening studs (multiple 94s) which are either molded (housing components i.e. 19 can be made from plastics, this suggest that 94 is molded with 19) onto the device connection part (19), or are embodied as separate parts and fitted to the device connection part. Claim(s) 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over De Carolis et al. [US 2009/0023320] and Genau [US 2013/0137310] as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Ito et al. [US 8,167,629]. Regarding claim 3, De Carolis and Genau disclose all of the claim limitations except wherein the circuit carrier comprises a plurality of through-contacts which are connected to the conducting tracks in an electrically conductive manner, which are embodied as electrically conductively-coated through-openings, wherein a.) the plug contacts are either embodied in the form of press-in contacts, wherein, at their terminal region, they respectively comprise a press-in pin, wherein the press-in contacts, at their press-in pins, are press-fitted into the respective through-contacts of the circuit carrier, or wherein b.) the plug contacts are embodied in the form of soldered contacts, wherein, at their terminal region, they comprise soldering pins, wherein the soldered contacts, at their soldering pins, are led through the respective through contacts of the circuit carrier and soldered thereto. However, Ito teaches the circuit carrier (fig. 8; 30) comprises a plurality of through-contacts (fig. 8; 36) which are connected to the conducting tracks (30 is a circuit board which suggest that 43/44 will be electrically connected to another electrical component through traces/tracks of circuit board 30) in an electrically conductive manner, which are embodied as electrically conductively-coated through-openings (36), wherein b.) the plug contacts (43) are embodied in the form of soldered contacts, wherein, at their terminal region (fig. 8; area of 43a/b), they comprise soldering pins (43a/b), wherein the soldered contacts (43a/b), at their soldering pins, are led through the respective through contacts (36) of the circuit carrier (30) and soldered thereto. Therefore, it would have been further obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to incorporate the circuit carrier comprises a plurality of through-contacts which are connected to the conducting tracks in an electrically conductive manner, which are embodied as electrically conductively-coated through-openings, wherein a.) the plug contacts are either embodied in the form of press-in contacts, wherein, at their terminal region, they respectively comprise a press-in pin, wherein the press-in contacts, at their press-in pins, are press-fitted into the respective through-contacts of the circuit carrier, or wherein b.) the plug contacts are embodied in the form of soldered contacts, wherein, at their terminal region, they comprise soldering pins, wherein the soldered contacts, at their soldering pins, are led through the respective through contacts of the circuit carrier and soldered thereto as suggested by Ito for the benefit of providing superior mechanical strength, high heat resistance, and better power handling compared to other PCB mounting technology. Claim(s) 11 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over De Carolis et al. [US 2009/0023320] and Genau [US 2013/0137310] as applied to claim 9 above, and further in view of DE 102006051281. Regarding claim 11, Carolis and Genau disclose all of the claim limitations except wherein the device connection part is produced by an injection-molding process, and is thus embodied as an integral injection-molded part with the contact carriers which are molded thereon. However, DE ‘281 teaches the device connection part (fig. 3; 12) is produced by an injection-molding process (DE ‘281 translation; Par [0100] Ln. 3-4; injection molding), and is thus embodied as an integral injection-molded part (12) with the contact carriers (fig. 3; 40) which are molded thereon (Par [0102]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to incorporate the device connection part is produced by an injection-molding process, and is thus embodied as an integral injection-molded part with the contact carriers which are molded thereon as suggested by DE ‘281 for the benefit of providing exceptional repeatability, extensive filler options for a desired strength, and the ability to produce parts with tailored aesthetic finishes or multiple materials in one step. Regarding claims 18-20, Carolis and Genau disclose the final product of claims 18-21 but, do not explicitly disclose the specific method steps A-G. Regarding claims 18-20, DE ‘281 teaches A. provide an injection-molding tool for device connection parts (12; 12 is formed by injection molding, therefore using a tool/die is old and well known in the art for the injection molding process); B. injection-mold of at least one device connection part (12) as a one-piece injection-molded part, which comprises contact carriers (40) which are molded thereupon at their respective position; C. Guage the relative position (position of 40 has to be analyzed in order to connect 44 to 46) of the contact carriers (40) of the at least one device connection part (12) with respect to one another; D. Determine appropriate terminal positions (fig. 3; positions of 76 corresponding to 44) on the circuit carrier (46) from measurement data established in process step C, and the formation of at least one circuit carrier (46), with through-contacts (76) at the terminal positions (positions of 76 corresponding to 44) thus determined; E. Injection-mold device connection parts using the injection-molding tool (tool that was used to make 12), and populate the contact carriers (40) with plug contacts (44), and the produce the circuit carrier (46) according to the terminal positions (positions of 76 corresponding to 44) determined in process step D; F. Terminal-side electrical contact connection (section of 44 that connects to 76) of connect the plug contacts (44) with the respective circuit carrier (46), and fasten the respective circuit carrier (46) to the respective device connection part (12); G. Respective join the device connection parts (12) with a housing base part (fig. 3; 104) of the device housing (10), wherein the circuit carrier (46) is arranged in the device housing (10); wherein, in process step E, the plug contacts (44) are either over-molded during the injection-molding process (see Par [0125] Ln. 3-4) or, further to the injection-molding process, are inserted into the contact chambers of the contact carriers. NOTE: In accordance to MPEP 2113, the method of forming the device is not germane to the issue of patentability of the device itself. Therefore, method steps of claims 18-20 has not been given SIGNIFICANT patentable weight. Please note that even though product-by-process claims are limited by and defined by the process, determination of patentability is based on the product itself. The patentability of a product, i.e. electrical device, does not depend on its method of production, i.e. injection molding steps of claims 18-20. In re Thorpe, 227 USPQ 964, 966 (Federal Circuit 1985). Therefore, it would have been further obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to incorporate the method steps of claims 18-20 as suggested by DE ‘281 for the benefit of providing exceptional repeatability, extensive filler options for a desired strength, and the ability to produce parts with tailored aesthetic finishes or multiple materials in one step. Claim(s) 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over De Carolis et al. [US 2009/0023320] and Genau [US 2013/0137310] as applied to claim 9 above, and further in view of Versterre et al. [US 4,399,836]. Carolis and Genau disclose all of the claim limitations except wherein the device connection part, at its terminal section comprises a plurality of mounting openings for the fitting of further separately embodied plug connectors. However, Versterre teaches the device connection part (fig. 2; 11), at its terminal section (fig. 2; 18) comprises a plurality of mounting openings (fig. 2; 17) for the fitting of further separately embodied plug connectors (fig. 2; 26, 26 is removably insertable). Therefore, it would have been further obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to incorporate the device connection part, at its terminal section comprises a plurality of mounting openings for the fitting of further separately embodied plug connectors as suggested by Versterre for the benefit of optimizing maintenance procedures when an electrical component needs servicing or improving the application of use for an electrical device by expanding the electrical capabilities of said device. Claim(s) 21 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over De Carolis et al. [US 2009/0023320], Genau [US 2013/0137310] and DE 102006051281 as applied to claim 19 above, and further in view of Howard et al. [US 6,386,891]. Carolis, Genau and DE ‘281 disclose (DE’ 281) F1.) for electrical contact-connection, the terminal regions of the plug contacts (44) are led through the through-contacts (holes that receive 44 in 46) in the respective circuit carrier (46), by a press-in or subsequent soldering arrangement (Par [0110] Ln. 4-5). Carolis, Genau and DE ‘281 do not disclose F1 being simultaneous with F2: fastening studs which are molded onto or applied to the device connection part respectively engage in an associated clamping recess in the respective circuit carrier, and are clamped therein. However, Howard teaches fastening studs (fig. 1; 21) which are molded onto or applied to the device connection part (fig. 1; 14) respectively engage in an associated clamping recess (fig. 1; 50) in the respective circuit carrier (fig. 1; 32), and are clamped therein (clamped by 14 and 12). NOTE: In accordance to MPEP 2113, the method of forming the device is not germane to the issue of patentability of the device itself. Therefore, method steps of claim 21 has not been given SIGNIFICANT patentable weight. Please note that even though product-by-process claims are limited by and defined by the process, determination of patentability is based on the product itself. The patentability of a product, i.e. electrical device, does not depend on its method of production, i.e. two steps of claim 21 being executed simultaneously. In re Thorpe, 227 USPQ 964, 966 (Federal Circuit 1985). Therefore, it would have been further obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to incorporate fastening studs which are molded onto or applied to the device connection part respectively engage in an associated clamping recess in the respective circuit carrier, and are clamped therein as suggested by Howard for the benefit of improving the internal stability of a circuit board. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 6 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892 form. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARCUS E HARCUM whose telephone number is (571)272-9986. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdullah Riyami can be reached at 571-270-3119. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARCUS E HARCUM/ Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 10, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12633695
MALE AND FEMALE POWER TERMINAL ASSEMBLY, FEMALE AND MALE POWER TERMINALS
3y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12633692
DYNAMIC CONNECTOR FOR IMPACT RESISTANCE
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12620744
CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY
3y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12614870
CONNECTOR
2y 6m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12614874
CONNECTOR COUPLER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+5.5%)
1y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 569 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month