Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/271,787

PLATED STEEL SHEET FOR HOT PRESS FORMING HAVING EXCELLENT HYDROGEN EMBRITTLEMENT RESISTANCE, HOT PRESS FORMED PARTS, AND MANUFACTURING METHODS THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 11, 2023
Priority
May 21, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0065296 +1 more
Examiner
YANG, JIE
Art Unit
1734
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Posco
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
769 granted / 1236 resolved
-2.8% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
1299
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
68.3%
+28.3% vs TC avg
§102
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§112
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1236 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Applicant elected Invention I (Claims 1-3), drawn to product of a plated steel sheet with Al-based plated layer, classified in class B32B15/012 for examination, without traverse. Therefore, Claims 7-11 have been cancelled; Claims 4-6 and 12-13 are withdrawn from consideration as non-elected claims, Claims 1-3 remain for examination, wherein claim 1 is an independent claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Tabata (US-PG-pub 2021/0355560, thereafter PG’560). Regarding claim 1, PG’560 teaches a coated steel member and coated steel sheet excellent in hydrogen embrittlement resistance in a corrosive environment for hot press (abstract and par.[0183] of PG’560), which reads on the claimed plated steel sheet for hot press as claimed in the instant claim. PG’560 teaches the Al-based coating with 0-1.0 mass% Ni (par.[0131] of PG’560). PG’560 provides working example #D17 in table 10-2 having 0.1 mass% Ni in the Al-based coating, which is within the claimed Ni range of 0.05-0.35 wt% as claimed in the instant claim. Since PG’560 teaches all limitation in the instant claim, Claim 1 anticipated by PG’560. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over PG’560. Regarding claim 2, The comparison between the claimed alloy composition ranges and the example #A18 in table 1 of PG’560 has been listed in following table. All of the essential alloy composition ranges disclosed in the example #A18 in table 1 of PG’560 are within the claimed alloy composition ranges. It is noted the Ti range disclosed in the example #A18 in table 1 of PG’560 is outside the claimed Ti range. However, PG’560 teaches adjusting the Ti in range of 0.010-0.100 mass% (par.[0077]), which overlaps the claimed Ti range. Overlapping Ti range creates a prima facie case of obviousness. MPEP 2144 05 I. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to optimize the Ti amount as claimed from the disclosure of PG’560 since PG’560 teaches the same Al-based coated steel sheet as claimed throughout whole disclosing range. Element From instant Claim 2 (mass %) #A18 in table 1 of PG’560 (mass %) Within range (mass %) C 0.07-0.5 0.33 0.33 Si 0.05-1 0.39 0.39 Mn 0.5-4 0.65 0.65 P 0.001-0.015 0.012 0.012 S 0.0001-0.02 0.0008 0.0008 Al 0.01-0.1 0.05 0.05 Cr 0.01-1 0.7 0.7 N 0.0010.02 0.004 0.004 Ti 0.01 or less 0.040 Adjusting range: 0.010-0.100 (par.[0077]) -- Overlap at 0.01 B 0.01 or less 0.0025 0.0025 Fe Balance + impurities Balance + impurities Balance + impurities Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over PG’560 and further in view of Kim et al (US-PG-pub 2020/0190620 A1, thereafter PG’620). Regarding claim 3, PG’560 teaches an Al-based alloy coated steel sheet (abstract, par.[0077] and [0183] of PG’560). PG’560 does not specify concentration gradient Al based plating layer as claimed in the instant claim. PG’620 teaches a steel sheet for a hot press formed member having excellent coating adhesion (Abstract and examples of PG’620). PG’620 teaches a concentration gradient in the Al alloy plated layer (abstract, claims, examples, par.[0013] and [0038] of PG’620), which reads on the claimed Al rich plating layer and the concentration gradient layer as claimed in the instant claim. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to form Al rich plating layer and the concentration gradient layer as demonstrated by PG’620 for the Al-based alloy coated steel sheet of PG’560 in order to obtain a steel sheet for a hot press formed member having excellent coating adhesion (Abstract and examples of PG’620). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JIE YANG whose telephone number is (571)270-1884. The examiner can normally be reached IFP. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan J Johnson can be reached on 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JIE YANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1734
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 11, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637739
REINFORCED METAL MATRIX COMPOSITES AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME
3y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637740
TITANIUM ALLOY
1y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630908
MULTIPHASE ULTRA-HIGH STRENGTH HOT ROLLED STEEL
2y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624433
FERRITIC STAINLESS STEEL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
3y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618128
STAINLESS STEEL FOR SEPARATOR OF POLYMER FUEL CELL HAVING EXCELLENT CORROSION RESISTANCE
3y 10m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+19.0%)
3y 5m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1236 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month