Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/271,937

USER EQUIPMENT (UE) AND COMMUNICATION CONTROL METHOD

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jul 12, 2023
Priority
Jan 15, 2021 — JP 2021-004785 +1 more
Examiner
GENACK, MATTHEW W
Art Unit
2645
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
3 (Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
4-5
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
355 granted / 554 resolved
+2.1% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
588
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
90.5%
+50.5% vs TC avg
§102
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§112
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 554 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 1. A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 1 April 2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments 2. Applicant's arguments filed 1 April 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant asserts, on pages 4-5 of Remarks, that “Applicant respectfully disagrees with the above assertions. Specifically, Qiao, in FIG. 14 which is cited in the Office Action, merely describes that a UE2 receives a PLMN1 ID usable in a network disaster from AN1/AMF1 in an PLMN1 that is unregistered. Furthermore, Qiao describes that the UE2 sends registration request to the PLMN 1 after receiving the PLMN ID usable in the network disaster. Qiao, however, does not describe that the UE2 receives one or more PLMN IDs usable in the disaster condition from a Home PLMN accepting the registration. Thus, Qiao fails to disclose, teach, or suggest, at least, the feature of "receive, from a Home Public Land Mobile Network (HPLMN), a registration accept message including one or more Public Land Mobile Network (PLMN) IDs usable in a disaster condition," as recited amended independent claim 1.” On the contrary, Qiao clearly discloses that a UE receives, from an HPLMN, a registration accept message that includes a disaster PLMN ID. Qiao states, in paragraph [0331]: “In an example action, the AMF may send to the UE via (R)AN registration accept message comprising at least one of: the allowed service type, the allowed service location area, the allowed service time duration, and/or the disaster PLMN ID.” [emphasis added]. Qiao further indicates, in paragraph [0267], that the AMF is part of the HPLMN: “The PLMN 2 may comprise base station (e.g. (R)AN 2), AMF 2, SMF 2, UPF 2, PCF 2, NEF 2, UDM2, OAM 2 and/or other network functions. In an example, a wireless device (e.g. UE 2) may subscribe to the second PLMN. As depicted in FIG. 13, the UE 2 may register to the home PLMN (e.g. PLMN 2) firstly, and access to an application server through the (R)AN 2 and core network (e.g. UPF 2) of the PLMN 2.” [emphasis added]. Therefore, Qiao discloses the claim 1 limitation “receive, from a Home Public Land Mobile Network (HPLMN), a registration accept message including one or more Public Land Mobile Network (PLMN) IDs usable in a disaster condition”. Applicant asserts, on page 5 of Remarks, that “the UE receives the PLMN ID of the HPLMN with the disaster condition after receiving the PLMN IDs that are usable in the disaster condition. Thus, Qiao does not describe the timing at which the UE receives the PLMN ID that is usable in the disaster condition and the PLMN ID with the disaster condition, as described in amended claim 1. As such, Qiao fails to disclose, teach, or suggest, at least, the above recited features of amended independent claim 1.” On the contrary, Qiao clearly discloses that the UE receives a disaster PLMN identifier in a broadcast during a disaster. Specifically, Qiao states, in paragraph [0270]: “An example embodiment of the present disclosure provides enhanced mechanisms to support a base station to receive disaster information (e.g. disaster information of an area) and broadcast a disaster PLMN identifier to the wireless devices in the coverage.” [emphasis added]. Therefore, Qiao discloses the claim 1 limitation “receive a PLMN ID of the HPLMN with the disaster condition, the PLMN ID of the HPLMN being broadcast during the disaster condition”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 3. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 4. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Qiao et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication 2023/0092577 (hereinafter Qiao). Regarding claim 1, Qiao discloses a User Equipment (UE) (disclosed is a UE, according to [0286], Fig. 14) comprising: transmission and reception circuitry (the UE sends and receives messages (and therefore comprises transmission and reception circuitry), according to Fig. 14), configured to: receive, from a Home Public Land Mobile Network (HPLMN), a registration accept message including one or more Public Land Mobile Network (PLMN) IDs usable in a disaster condition (the UE receives, from an AMF (which is part of an HPLMN, according to [0267]), a registration accept message comprising a disaster PLMN ID, according to [0331]); and in a case that the one or more PLMN IDs usable in the disaster condition are received: receive a PLMN ID of the HPLMN with the disaster condition, the PLMN ID of the HPLMN being broadcast during the disaster condition (a disaster PLMN identifier is broadcast to the UE during a disaster, according to [0270]), and transmit, to a PLMN usable in a disaster condition, a registration request message including a 5G System (5GS) registration type Information Element (IE) indicating that registration is for disaster roaming (the UE may participate in Disaster Inbound Roaming when a Disaster Condition is affecting its serving PLMN, according to [0266], whereby the UE transmits a registration request message comprising 5G identification information and a disaster PLMN indication indicating that said UE selects a first PLMN during the disaster that is affecting a second PLMN, according to [0286]). Claim 2 recites the communication control method (disclosed is an associated communication control method, according to [0361]) that the User Equipment recited in claim 1 performs, and is therefore rejected on the same grounds as claim 1. Conclusion 5. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW W GENACK whose telephone number is (571)272-7541. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday, 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM Eastern Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony Addy can be reached at 571-272-7795. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW W GENACK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2645
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 12, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Oct 07, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 01, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641409
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCED ACCESS AND MOBILITY DATA CONTROL
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635017
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD, AP DEVICE, AND STA DEVICE
9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12604174
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR INTELLIGENT ROAMING USING RADIO ACCESS NETWORK INTELLIGENT CONTROLLERS
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604243
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING CONDITIONAL PSCELL ADDITION AND CHANGE CONTINUOUSLY IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 8m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593299
INFORMATION TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+23.1%)
3y 6m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 554 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month