Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/272,816

ELECTRODE MANUFACTURING METHOD AND ELECTRODE MANUFACTURING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 18, 2023
Priority
Mar 02, 2021 — JP 2021-032921 +2 more
Examiner
KIM, PAUL D
Art Unit
3729
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Ricoh Company, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
1387 granted / 1582 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
57 currently pending
Career history
1642
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
37.6%
-2.4% vs TC avg
§102
27.1%
-12.9% vs TC avg
§112
32.2%
-7.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1582 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is a response to the restriction requirement filed on 7/9/2026. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Group I, Species A, claims 1-6 and 10-14, in the reply filed on 7/9/2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claims 7-9 and 15 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 7/9/2026. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: --ELECTRODE MANUFACTURING METHOD--. Claim Objections Claims 1-6 and 10-14 are objected to because of the following informalities: Re. claim 1: The phrase “an electrode cut out in a desired shape” as recited in line 9 appears to be --an electrode cut out in the desired shape--. Re. claim 5: The phrase “cut by laser light” as recited in line 3 appears to be --cut by a laser light--. Re. claim 6: The phrase “the positional information is acquired by image recognition” as recited in line 3 appears to be --the positional information is acquired by an image recognition--. Re. claim 7: The phrase “the positional information is acquired by image recognition” as recited in line 3 appears to be --the positional information is acquired by an image recognition--. Re. claim 12: The phrase “containing an electrode mixture material” as recited in lines 3-4 appears to be --containing the electrode mixture material--. The phrase “containing an electron insulating layer forming material” as recited in lines 6-7 appears to be --containing an electron insulating layer forming a material--. Re. claim 14: The phrase “and a position at which and a shape in which the electrode liquid composition is applied” as recited in lines 4-5 appears to be --and the position at which and the shape in which the electrode liquid composition is applied--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6, 10, 11 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Masuzawa et al. (PGPub 2020/0119333 A1). Masuzawa et al. teach a process of making an electrode, comprising steps of: a first step of applying an electrode liquid composition (13a, 13b, Fig. 2C, paragraphs )0186]-[0187]) in a desired shape at a desired position on a substrate (2, Fig. 2C), the electrode liquid composition containing an electrode mixture material; a second step of acquiring positional information as to where the electrode liquid composition is applied as shown in Fig. 2C (paragraph [0144]); and a third step of cutting only the substrate at a desired position in a region other than an electrode mixture material region where the electrode liquid composition is applied to obtain an electrode cut out in a desired shape as shown in Figs. 4A and 4B (paragraph [0191]). Re. claim 2: The desired position as to where the electrode liquid composition is applied, the desired shape in which the electrode liquid composition is applied, and the desired position as to where the substrate is cut in the first to third steps are controllable by a control device as shown in Fig. 2C and 4B (paragraph [0142]). Re. claim 3: The desired position as to where the electrode liquid composition is applied, the desired shape in which the electrode liquid composition is applied, and the desired shape at which the substrate is cut are controllable based on digital data by the control device as shown in Fig. 2C and 4B (paragraph [0142]). Re. claim 4: The electrode liquid composition is discharged from a nozzle (paragraph [0118]). Re. claim 5: Only the substrate is cut by laser light as shown in Fig. 4B (paragraph [0149]). Re. claim 6: The positional information is acquired by image recognition performed with respect to an end shape of the electrode mixture material region (paragraphs [0140]-[0144]). Re. claims 10 and 11: The substrate is a strip of metallic foil or an insulating substrate (paragraph [0183]). Re. claim 13: A step of inverting the substrate and applying the electrode liquid composition at a desired position on a second surface of the substrate, the second surface being a surface on which the electrode liquid composition has not been applied as shown in Fig. 2E (paragraph [0189]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Masuzawa et al. as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Singh et al. (PGPub 2015/0027615 A1). Masuzawa et al. teach all limitations as set forth above, but silent how to form an electrode mixture layer and an electron insulating layer. Singh et al. teach a process of making a multilayer electrical device such that a liquid composition (20, Fig. 1(A), (2), paragraph [0032]) containing an active material is applied to form an electrode mixture layer (22, Fig. 1(A), (2), paragraph [0032]), and a step of applying a liquid composition containing (26, Fig. 1(A), (3), paragraph [0032]) an electron insulating layer forming material without the active material onto the electrode mixture layer to form an electron insulating layer (28, Fig. 1(A), (3), paragraph [0032]) on the electrode mixture layer, wherein the electron insulating layer covers the entire electrode mixture layer. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made, to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify a process of fabricating an electrode of Masuzawa et al. by forming an electrode mixture layer and an electron insulating layer deposited on top of the electrode mixture layer as taught by Singh et al. in order to produce a multilayer energy storge device or a multilayered electrode. Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Masuzawa et al. as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Yamazaki et al. (US PAT. 7,038,836). Masuzawa et al. teach all limitations as set forth above, but silent at least the first step conducted under an environment filled with dry air or an inert gas. Yamazaki et al. teach a process of making an electrical device such that “A leading electrode 115 extracts the organic resin liquid that has become charged particles from the nozzle 113, an accelerating electrode 116 accelerates the charged particles in a flying direction. Further, a controlling electrode 117 controls the application position to thereby apply the liquid on the desired position of the substrate 110” in col. 4, lines 33-39 and “During the formation of the EL layer 42, the atmosphere for processing is an atmosphere that contains little moisture and oxygen because the EL layer is easily degraded due to the presence of moisture and oxygen. That is, it is desirable to perform the formation of the EL layer in an inert gas such as nitrogen or argon” in col. 9, lines 42-47. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made, to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify a process of fabricating an electrode of Masuzawa et al. by applying a liquid under an environment filled with dry air or an inert gas as taught by Yamazaki et al. in order to control a rate of the liquid material when the liquid material is applied on the substrate. The Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Nishio et al. (PGPub 2019/0198860 A1), Kawase (PGPub 2004/0071872 A1), and Yamazaki et al. (PGPub 2003/0206332 A1) are cited to further show the state of the art with respect to a process of making an electrode by discharging a liquid active material on the substrate. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAUL D KIM whose telephone number is (571)272-4565. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday: 6:00 AM-2:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas Hong can be reached at 571-272-0993. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAUL D KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 18, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770651
MANUFACTURING METHOD AND MANUFACTURING DEVICE OF DISK DRIVE SUSPENSION
4y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12765410
MOUNTING HEAD
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12749621
COIL MANUFACTURING APPARATUS, COIL MANUFACTURING SYSTEM, COIL MANUFACTURING METHOD, AND COIL
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744357
CONTROLLED EXTRACTION OF ELECTRONIC CONNECTOR FROM ELECTRONIC CONNECTOR BOARD
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12731721
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR THERMAL MANAGEMENT IN INDUCTORS
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+6.8%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1582 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month