Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/272,957

IMAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 18, 2023
Priority
Jan 21, 2021 — JP 2021-007923 +1 more
Examiner
WANG, YUEHAN
Art Unit
2617
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
NEC Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
409 granted / 492 resolved
+21.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
534
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
90.5%
+50.5% vs TC avg
§102
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§112
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 492 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Response to Amendment Applicant’s amendments filed on July 15, 2025 have been entered. Claims 1, 9 and 17 have been amended, and claims 3, 4, 11, 12, 19 and 20 have been previously canceled. Claims 1, 2, 5-8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 17, 18, and 21-23 are still pending in this application, with claims 1, 9 and 17 being independent. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 2, 5-8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 17, 18, and 21-23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over YAMAHIRO (JP 2020077420 A), referred herein as YAMAHIRO (from IDS) in view of UENO (US 20150206010 A1), referred herein as UENO and Maguire et al. (US 20210121155 A1), referred herein as Maguire. Regarding Claims 1, 9 and 17, YAMAHIRO in view of UENO and Maguire teaches an image processing system, method and non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising at least one memory configured to store instructions; at least one processor configured to execute the instructions to perform operations (YAMAHIRO Abst: a portable terminal, an identity verification server, an identity verification system and a program; FIG. 1), the operations comprising: analyzing an image in a video captured by a camera (YAMAHIRO Abst: A portable terminal 1 with a camera 23 is such that identity verification of a user at the start of a service can be performed by the portable terminal 1 alone carried by the user; [0042] The control unit 10 analyzes the personal identification image and identifies the personal identification document); detecting a pose of a personal identification document in the image (YAMAHIRO [0043] a document position area 81b in which the identity verification document is placed); acquiring, as an image to be processed, an image in the video YAMAHIRO [0077] In S340 of FIG. 14, the control unit 310 (identity confirmation image processing unit 313) of the mobile terminal 301 activates the out-camera 23b and causes the touch panel display 25 to display a through image of the out-camera 23b. Further, the control unit 310 outputs a document position guide image 350 in which the front side of the identity verification document is in the shooting direction, as shown in FIG. 15A, to the touch panel display 25); and outputting, onto the video, guide information representing a reference pose of the personal identification document while changing a type and a display position thereof, depending on a detection result of a pose of the personal identification document (YAMAHIRO [0078] The document position guide image 350 shown in FIG. 15 (A) is an image including a document position area 350a for arranging an identity verification document and a shooting button 350b. The document position guide image 350 is a transparent image. This is for outputting together with the through image of the out camera 23b, and at least the document position area 350a needs to be transparent). YAMAHIRO does not but UENO teaches in which a pose associated to any of a plurality of reference poses preset (UENO [0072] The overlapping definition table 310 according to the embodiment includes a reference ID, position information, a display size, a rotation angle, and a file name as items of information, and items other than those are correlated with an employee number. According to the embodiment, the position information, the display size, the rotation angle, and the file name which are correlated with the reference ID are set to definition information corresponding to the reference ID; FIG. 5). YAMAHIRO in view of UENO further teaches wherein the information processing device outputs the generated data of the video to the display device, and causes the display device to display the data (KANESHIGE7963 [0017] the output unit 21b outputs the character data arithmetically processed by the arithmetic unit 21a to the display device 11). YAMAHIRO does not but Maguire teaches wherein the operations further comprise causing a movement amount of a display position of the guide information between before and after changing of the display position to be equal to or more than a predetermined first threshold value and to be equal to or less than a second threshold value larger than the predetermined first threshold value (Maguire [0048] the external sensor 24 may include the display 206 to indicate the suggested movements of the tracheal tube 26 and/or illuminate a light indicator of the output device 86 to coordinate with the suggested movements or movement parameter 176 (e.g., red for outside a first threshold, yellow for within the first and outside a second threshold, green for within the second threshold)). UENO discloses a display control device includes circuitry configured to detect a specific object that is supported by an authentication target in an image. UENO is analogous to the present patent application. It would have been obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified YAMAHIRO to incorporate the teachings of UENO, and apply the registered image dataset into the identity verification processing. Doing so would provide a comparison between the authentication target and the registered user in the image processing system. Maguire discloses a position monitoring system. Maguire is analogous to the present patent application. It would have been obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified YAMAHIRO to incorporate the teachings of Maguire, and apply the plurality of thresholds of movement amount into the identity verification processing. Doing so would instruct the display to present an indication of the position of the distal portion based on feedback from the detector in the image processing system. Regarding Claims 2, 10 and 18, YAMAHIRO in view of UENO and Maguire teaches the image processing system according to claims 1, 9 and 17, respectively, and further teaches wherein the operations comprise changing a type and a display position of the guide information, in response to detection of a pose, as a pose of the personal identification document, associated to a reference pose specified by the guide information (YAMAHIRO [0085] in the personal identification system 300, the document position guide images of various shooting directions and shooting positions are stored in the storage unit 320, and the control unit 310 randomly selects the document position guide images from the stored image. , May be output. The document position guide images at various shooting directions and shooting positions are, for example, a document position guide image 361 shown in FIG. 16 (A) to a document position guide image 364 shown in FIG. 16 (D)). Regarding Claims 5, 13 and 21, YAMAHIRO in view of UENO and Maguire teaches the image processing system according to claims 1, 9 and 17, respectively, and further teaches wherein the operations comprise controlling a display position of the guide information within a range narrower than an angle view of the camera (YAMAHIRO [0079] The document position area 351a indicates the photographing direction from an oblique direction so that the face photograph of the personal identification document can be confirmed and the thickness of the long side of the personal identification document can be confirmed. Therefore, the document position area 351a is shown as a trapezoid with a long base; [0082] The control unit 310, for example, confirms that the identity verification document is within the document position area 350a and that the identity verification image can be acquired in a predetermined size, and that the acquired identity verification image is the identity verification document. Confirm that there is (for example, the front of the driver's license 3). The control unit 310 performs this confirmation on all the acquired personal identification images). Regarding Claims 6, 14 and 22, YAMAHIRO in view of UENO and Maguire teaches the image processing system according to claims 1, 9 and 17, respectively, and further teaches wherein the operations comprise changing a display position of the guide information along a height direction of a display area for displaying the video (YAMAHIRO [0080] the document position area 351a may not be indicated by a frame line, but may be indicated by lines indicating the positions of the two long sides of the personal identification document. The document position area 351a may be used to confirm the thickness of the short side of the personal identification document). Regarding Claims 7 and 23, YAMAHIRO in view of UENO and Maguire teaches the image processing system according to claims 1 and 17, respectively, and further teaches wherein the operations comprise changing a display position of the guide information along a width direction of a display area for displaying the video (YAMAHIRO [0080] the document position area 351a may not be indicated by a frame line, but may be indicated by lines indicating the positions of the two long sides of the personal identification document. The document position area 351a may be used to confirm the thickness of the short side of the personal identification document). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on 14 November, 2025, with respect to the 103 rejection have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. On page 4, Applicant's Remarks, with respect to claims 1, 9 and 17, the applicant argues the "threshold(s)" in Maguire is merely a "value(s) for determining an appropriate position of a tracheal tube". Examiner actually agrees with this statement. The moving values of a physical tracheal tube under an image guided procedure achieves the same result of moving amount of a physical PID. The primary reference YAMAHIRO disclosed “touch panel display 25 to output an instruction to change the orientation of the user's face, and outputs the instruction from”. The combination of YAMAHIRO and Maguire would be able to display the movement amount (aka. value) determined by Maguire, as an instruction message of YAMAHIRO. Therefore, the display position of the PID is determined by the movement amount as instructed. Regarding this argument, it is respectfully noted that, YAMAHIRO in view of UENO and Maguire teaches wherein the operations further comprise causing a movement amount of a display position of the guide information between before and after changing of the display position to be equal to or more than a predetermined first threshold value and to be equal to or less than a second threshold value larger than the predetermined first threshold value, as claimed. On page 5 of Applicant’s Remarks, the Applicant argues the corresponding dependent claims are not taught by the prior art, insomuch as they depend from claims that are not taught by the prior art. Examiner respectfully disagrees with these arguments, for the reasons discussed above. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Samantha (Yuehan) Wang whose telephone number is (571)270-5011. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, King Poon can be reached on (571)272-7440. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Samantha (YUEHAN) WANG/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2617
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Aug 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 14, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 02, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 02, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 11, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12633074
ELECTRONIC DEVICE INTERLOCKED WITH ENDOSCOPE TO PERFORM ENDOSCOPIC EXAMINATION AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING ENDOSCOPIC EXAMINATION USING THE SAME
2y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12620142
REMOTE OPERATION SYSTEM AND REMOTE OPERATION COMPOSITE SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12614353
TECHNIQUES FOR GENERATING AND APPLYING 3D TINT BANDS TO A MAP
3y 4m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12597178
VECTOR OBJECT PATH SEGMENT EDITING
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597506
ENDOSCOPIC EXAMINATION SUPPORT APPARATUS, ENDOSCOPIC EXAMINATION SUPPORT METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 4m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+13.3%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 492 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month