Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/273,124

Vehicle Drive Motor

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 19, 2023
Priority
Mar 22, 2021 — JP 2021-047126 +1 more
Examiner
STEFANON, JUSTIN
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Hitachi Astemo Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
51%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 51% of resolved cases
51%
Career Allowance Rate
95 granted / 186 resolved
-16.9% vs TC avg
Strong +48% interview lift
Without
With
+48.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
238
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
64.8%
+24.8% vs TC avg
§102
33.2%
-6.8% vs TC avg
§112
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 186 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/02/2025 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-5, filed 12/02/2025 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by NAKATA (US 20220282784; previously cited). Regarding claim 1, NAKATA discloses a vehicle drive motor (para [0003]), comprising: a casing 6 in which a cylindrical stator coil 26 is fixed to an inner peripheral surface and an oil passage 90 is provided in an upper portion; an output shaft 46 arranged in the casing 6 and having a rotor 20 fixed to a position facing the stator coil 26; a bearing 84 that supports the output shaft 46; and an oil retaining portion 64c that is arranged to face the bearing 84 and stores oil supplied from the oil passage 90 (para [0177]), wherein the oil retaining portion 64c is a pocket-shaped receptacle 64c configured to retain oil by gravity so as to maintain lubrication of the bearing 84 even when rotation of the output shaft 46 is stopped (para [0176]), the pocket-shaped receptacle 64c has an upper side 64cp positioned below a lower end of the output shaft 46 and a lower side extending along a lower outer periphery of the bearing 84 as viewed from an axial direction of the output shaft 46 in front view (Fig. 3) and the pocket-shaped receptacle 64c is formed as a concave structure that collects and holds oil in a stable stored state adjacent to the bearing 84 (para [0176]). PNG media_image1.png 527 696 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, NAKATA discloses the vehicle drive motor according to claim 1, wherein the oil retaining portion 64c is a substantially U-shaped receptacle which surrounds an outer periphery of the output shaft 46 and in which an upper end height 64ca is substantially equal to a center height of the output shaft 46 as viewed from the axial direction of the output shaft 46 in front view (Fig. 3). Regarding claim 3, NAKATA discloses the vehicle drive motor according to claim 1, wherein the oil retaining portion 64c is a substantially crescent-shaped receptacle which surrounds an outer periphery of the output shaft 46 and in which an upper end height 64ca is substantially equal to a center height of the output shaft 46 as viewed from the axial direction of the output shaft 46 in front view. Regarding claim 4, NAKATA discloses the vehicle drive motor according to claim 1, wherein the oil retaining portion 64c is formed integrally with a retainer 64 restricting movement of the bearing 84 in the axial direction (para [0043] and [0046]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over NAKATA in view of CHRISTENSEN (US 0865083). Regarding claim 5, NAKATA discloses the vehicle drive motor according to claim 1, wherein the output shaft 46 is supported by a pair of bearings 84, 85. However, NAKATA does not disclose the oil retaining portion is provided for each of the bearings. CHRISTENSEN teaches an electric motor with oil retaining portions 8 provided for each of two bearings 18. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to provide the motor of NAKATA with the oil retaining portion is provided for each of the bearings, similar to CHRISTENSEN. A person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains would have been motivated to make such modification in order to control the amount of oil provided to the bearings to protect the armature, as taught by CHRISTENSEN (Col. 1, lines 31-36). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. SHIMIZU US 5312192 discloses bearing lubricating structure with a concave oil retaining portion. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN STEFANON whose telephone number is (703)756-4648. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday and alternate Fridays 8AM - 5PM EDT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Oluseye Iwarere can be reached at (571) 270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN STEFANON/Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /OLUSEYE IWARERE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 19, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Aug 21, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 03, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Dec 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 29, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 22, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12494684
ROTOR OF AN ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 3m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Patent 12451742
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR COOLING A ROTOR ASSEMBLY
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 21, 2025
Patent 12316190
CASE STRUCTURE OF IN-WHEEL MOTOR
2y 10m to grant Granted May 27, 2025
Patent 9650015
BELT RETRACTOR FOR A VEHICLE SAFETY BELT
2y 8m to grant Granted May 16, 2017
Patent 9635986
SPINDLE AND ADAPTER FOR ROLL PAPER PRODUCT DISPENSERS
5y 6m to grant Granted May 02, 2017
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
51%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+48.0%)
3y 2m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 186 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month