Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/273,421

COMPOUND AND ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT ELEMENT USING SAID COMPOUND

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 20, 2023
Priority
Feb 15, 2021 — JP 2021-021890 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, LUCAS QUOC
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hodogaya Chemical Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 0% of cases
0%
Career Allowance Rate
0 granted / 0 resolved
-60.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
15
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
76.3%
+36.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 0 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: the specification contains molecular structures, including but not limited to compound 3-4 that displays a small, pixelated structure where the atom labels are unclear (¶[0156]). PNG media_image1.png 186 203 media_image1.png Greyscale Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zhang et al. (CN109705148A, hereinafter "Zhang"). Note that a machine-generated English translation is relied upon and provided with this office action. In the pertinent art of organic light-emitting devices, Zhang discloses a display panel comprising an organic light-emitting device containing an organic compound including a specific compound CP008, shown below (description pg 1, 8, claim 10). PNG media_image2.png 1562 1804 media_image2.png Greyscale Compound CP008 is a compound of general formula 1 in instant claim 1 wherein: B represents an unsubstituted aromatic hydrocarbon group; B is an unsubstituted naphthalenyl group; Ar1 and Ar2 are different; Ar1 is a substituted divalent aromatic hydrocarbon group; Ar2 is a single bond; A1 and A2 are different and represent a monovalent group of general formula 2 wherein; A1 represent general formula 2 wherein; X1 is N; X2 – X8 is C; R2 represent a binding site; R3 – R8 is H; represented by general formula 3a; A2 represent general formula 2 wherein; X1 – X8 is C; R1 represent a binding site; R2 – R8 is H; represented by general formula 3c; Therefore, compound CP008 of Zhang anticipates instant claims 1-3. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al. (CN109705148A, hereinafter "Zhang"), as applied to claims 1-3 described above. Zhang teaches compound CP008, shown above, that reads on claims 1-3 as described above. Regarding instant claims 4 and 5, Zhang teaches an organic light-emitting device including an ITO anode, first hole transport layer, second hole transport layer, light-emitting layer, first electron transport layer, second electron transport layer, cathode, and a cap layer in that order wherein the cap layer consists of a compound of chemical formula 1 such as compound CP004, CP017, etc. (Description pg 12-14, Table 1). Zhang teaches that the aromatic compounds of claim 10, including compound CP008, have a refractive index greater than or equal to 1.9 between the visible light with wavelengths between 400 – 700 nm when used as the CPL cap layer in OLED devices (claim 11, description pg 7). Zhang teaches the above; however, Zhang is silent on an organic light-emitting device wherein compound CP008 is in the cap layer. Zhang teaches an anode, a cathode, and a cap layer and the compound is in the cap layer as discussed above. It would have been obvious to use the compound CP008 in the cap layer with the device structure of anode, first hole transport layer, second hole transport layer, light-emitting layer, first electron transport layer, second electron transport layer, cathode, and a cap layer as Zhang demonstrates this device structure was known prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention. The resulting Modified Device 1 of Zhang reads on instant claims 4-5. Regarding instant claims 6-7, Zhang teaches an organic light-emitting device with an organic layer, located between the anode and cathode, including a hole transport layer, an electron transport layer, and a light-emitting layer wherein the material of at least one of the cap layer, hole transport layer, electron transport layer, and light-emitting layer is the aromatic ring compound such as CP008 (Description pg 2). Zhang teaches a display panel, which is an electronic device, comprising an organic light-emitting device containing the aromatic compound of Zhang such as CP008 (Description pg 7). However, Zhang is silent on an organic light-emitting device wherein CP008 is included in the organic layer. Zhang teaches an anode, a cathode, and an organic layer and the aromatic compound of chemical formula 1 is in the organic layer as discussed above. It would have been obvious to use the compound CP008 in the organic layer with the device structure of anode, organic layer, and cathode as Zhang demonstrates this device structure was known prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Therefore, the Modified Device 2 of Zhang reads on instant claims 6-7. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LUCAS Q NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1199. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 7:30 am - 5:00 pm Fridays 7:45 am to 12:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Boyd can be reached at 571-272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /L.Q.N./Examiner, Art Unit 1786 /JENNA N CHANDHOK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1789
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 20, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
Grant Probability
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 0 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month