Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/273,977

QUANTUM DOT AND ELECTROLUMINESCENT ELEMENT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 25, 2023
Priority
Jan 28, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2021003073
Examiner
KOSLOW, CAROL M
Art Unit
1734
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Toppan Holdings Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1797 granted / 2196 resolved
+16.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
2225
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
44.1%
+4.1% vs TC avg
§102
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
§112
36.4%
-3.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 2196 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-11 in the reply filed on 17 April 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 12-14 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected inventions, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. patent application publication 2017/0066965. This reference teaches a blue light emitting cadmium free quantum dot comprising a ZnSe core, a ZnSe1-xSx buffer layer adjacent to the core where 0.25<x<0.75 or 0.25<x<0.5 (para 150) and a ZnS shell. The taught structure of a ZnSe1-xSx buffer layer adjacent to the core and a ZnS shell read upon the claimed shell structure of claims 1, 5, 6 and 9 since the ZnSe1-xSx buffer layer corresponds with the boundary portion and the innermost layer of the claimed shells and the ZnS shell corresponds with the outermost portion or layer of the claimed shells. The composition of the ZnSe1-xSx buffer layer adjacent to the core where 0.25<x<0.75 or 0.25<x<0.5 falls within that of claims 3 and 9 and the ZnS layer composition meets the outermost portion or layer of claims 3 and 9. It is clear from the reference that the composition of the shell stepwise changes in the manner as described in claim 4. Paragraph [0103] teaches the ZnSe core has a size of 5-15 nm, which falls within the size range of claim 2. Paragraph [0126] teaches the ZnS shell has a thickness of 0.3-1.2 nm. Paragraph [0164] teaches the ZnSe1-xSx buffer layer has a thickness of 0.3-1.2 nm. The calculated total thickness of the taught buffer layer and taught shell is 0.6-2.4 nm, which falls within the thickness of the shell of claim 1. Based on the taught thicknesses of each part of the taught shell, the calculated layer thickness of each of the ZnS shell and the ZnSe1-xSx buffer layer is 20-50% of the total thickness of both. This calculated percentage falls within the ranges of claims 7 and 8. The reference teaches the claimed quantum dots. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. patent application publication 2017/0066965. This reference teaches a blue light emitting cadmium free quantum dot comprising a ZnSe core, a ZnSe1-xSx buffer layer adjacent to the core where 0<x<1 (para 150) and a ZnS shell. The taught structure of a ZnSe1-xSx buffer layer adjacent to the core and a ZnS shell read upon the claimed shell structure of claims 1, 5, 6 and 9 since the ZnSe1-xSx buffer layer corresponds with the boundary portion and the innermost layer of the claimed shells and the ZnS shell corresponds with the outermost portion or layer of the claimed shells. The composition of the ZnSe1-xSx buffer layer adjacent to the core where 0<x<1 overlaps that of claims 3 and 9 and the ZnS layer composition meets the outermost portion or layer of claims 3 and 9. Product claims with numerical ranges which overlap prior art ranges were held to have been obvious under 35 USC 103. In re Wertheim 191 USPQ 90 (CCPA 1976); In re Malagari 182 USPQ 549 (CCPA 1974); In re Fields 134 USPQ 242 (CCPA 1962); In re Nehrenberg 126 USPQ 383 (CCPA 1960). Also see MPEP 2144.05. It is clear from the reference that the composition of the shell stepwise changes in the manner as described in claim 4. Paragraph [0103] teaches the ZnSe core has a size of 1-15 nm, which overlaps the size range of claim 2. Paragraph [0126] teaches the ZnS shell has a thickness of 0.3-1.2 nm. Paragraph [0164] teaches the ZnSe1-xSx buffer layer has a thickness of 0.3-1.2 nm. The calculated total thickness of the taught buffer layer and taught shell is 0.6-2.4 nm, which falls within the thickness of the shell of claim 1. Based on the taught thicknesses of each part of the taught shell, the calculated layer thickness of each of the ZnS shell and the ZnSe1-xSx buffer layer is 20-50% of the total thickness of both. This calculated percentage falls within the ranges of claims 7 and 8. The reference suggests the claimed quantum dots. Claims 1, 2, 4, 5 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. patent application 2018/0327665. This reference teaches a blue light emitting cadmium free quantum dot comprising a ZnTeSe core and a shell layer of Zn, Se and S. The core has a particle size of about 2-6 nm, (para 18, 19 and 83), which overlaps the range of claim 2. Product claims with numerical ranges which overlap prior art ranges were held to have been obvious under 35 USC 103. In re Wertheim 191 USPQ 90 (CCPA 1976); In re Malagari 182 USPQ 549 (CCPA 1974); In re Fields 134 USPQ 242 (CCPA 1962); In re Nehrenberg 126 USPQ 383 (CCPA 1960). Also see MPEP 2144.05. Paragraphs [0086]-[0087] teaches the shell has a thickness of about 0.5-10 nm, which overlaps the shell thickness range taught in claim 1 and that the shell has a gradient structure made up of a plurality of layers wherein each layer has an increasing amount of S and a decreasing amount of Se, the innermost layer is composed of ZnSeS and the outermost layer is composed of ZnS. It is clear from these teachings that the sell must have at least three layers. This teaching meets the claimed shell structure of claims 1, 4, 5 and 10. The reference suggested the claimed quantum dot. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 11 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. There is no teaching or suggestion in the cited art of record of a quantum dot, containing no Cd and configured to emit blue light, and which comprises a core comprising Zn, Se and Cu; and a shell having a thickness of 0.5-3 nm and the shell has a boundary portion comprising Zn, Se and S and an outermost portion comprising Zn and S, wherein the content of Cu in relation to Zn in the quantum dot is 0.1-10 ppm. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to C. MELISSA KOSLOW whose telephone number is (571)272-1371. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Tues:7:45-3:45 EST;Thurs-Fri:6:30-2:00EST; and Wed:7:45-2:00EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C Melissa Koslow/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1734 cmk 5/7/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 25, 2023
Application Filed
May 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12674095
QUANTUM DOT COMPOSITION, LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE USING THE QUANTUM DOT COMPOSITION, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668548
DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH POWER TEXTURED PIEZOELECTRIC CERAMICS WITH ULTRAHIGH ELECTROMECHANICAL PROPERTIES FOR LARGE DRIVING FIELD APPLICATIONS
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662416
QUANTUM DOT-DOPED GLASS AND A METHOD FOR MAKING
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655348
INK COMPOSITION AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING FILM FORMED USING THE INK COMPOSITION
4y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12654388
THERMALLY CURABLE PIEZOELECTRIC COMPOSITES AND USE THEREOF IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+12.0%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 2196 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month