Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/274,131

REGISTRATION APPARATUS, REFERENCE APPARATUS, REGISTRATION METHOD, REFERENCE METHOD, COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM, MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, AND MANAGEMENT METHOD

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jul 25, 2023
Priority
Jan 28, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2021003115
Examiner
ORTIZ RODRIGUEZ, CARLOS R
Art Unit
2119
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
NEC Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
560 granted / 730 resolved
+21.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
770
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
§103
38.6%
-1.4% vs TC avg
§102
32.4%
-7.6% vs TC avg
§112
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 730 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-2, 7-8, and 13-20 are cancelled. Claims 3-6, 9-12, and 21-26 are pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, filed 01/02/2026, have been fully considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. It can be noted that the term “digest value” is being interpreted as value that is utilized to identify data in order to simplify data analysis. Markham discloses obtaining and utilizing diverse representations of time-related data and other manufacturing data in simplified versions in order to simplify data analysis. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 3-6, 9-12, and 21-26 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Markham et al., US Patent No. 7,032,816 (hereinafter Markham). Regarding claims 3-6, 9-12, and 21-26, Markham discloses all the claimed limitations as outlined below: Claim 3 A reference apparatus comprising: at least one memory that is configured to store instructions; and at least one processor, wherein the reference apparatus is communicably connected to a storage unit, the storage unit storing, in association with identification information of a product and identification information of an item related to a manufacturing process, a digest value of the manufacturing process information related to the item among the manufacturing process information related to the manufacturing process of the product, wherein the at least one processor that is configured to execute the instructions to: acquire the identification information of the product to be referenced; and output reference information by which it can determine, for one or more of the items, whether or not the digest value of the manufacturing process information is stored in the storage unit in association with the identification information of the item and the identification information of the product to be referenced (C5-6, C9 L48-67, C11L49-67, and C12 L1-8 - - Using the STORM and PIPE system for identification and compliance purposes. It can be noted that the term “digest value” is being interpreted as value that is utilized to identify data in order to simplify data analysis. Markham discloses obtaining and utilizing diverse representations of time-related data and other manufacturing data in simplified versions in order to simplify data analysis). Claim 4 The reference apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the manufacturing process information is data of a procedure manual that defines a procedure of a work related to manufacturing of the product, data indicating that the manufacturing process of the product complies with a guideline, or data indicating a record of a work performed in the manufacturing process of the product (C5-6, C9 L48-67, C11L49-67, and C12 L1-8 - - Using the STORM and PIPE system for identification and compliance purposes. It can be noted that the term “digest value” is being interpreted as value that is utilized to identify data in order to simplify data analysis. Markham discloses obtaining and utilizing diverse representations of time-related data and other manufacturing data in simplified versions in order to simplify data analysis). Claim 5 The reference apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the at least one processor that is configured to execute the instructions further to: determine the identification information of each of a plurality of the items that can be associated with the identification information of the product to be referenced and output the reference information for each of the determined items (C5-6, C9 L48-67, C11L49-67, and C12 L1-8 - - Using the STORM and PIPE system for identification and compliance purposes. It can be noted that the term “digest value” is being interpreted as value that is utilized to identify data in order to simplify data analysis. Markham discloses obtaining and utilizing diverse representations of time-related data and other manufacturing data in simplified versions in order to simplify data analysis). Claim 6 The reference apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the at least one processor that is configured to execute the instructions further to: acquire the identification information of the item to be referenced; and output the reference information for the acquired identification information of the item to be referenced (C5-6, C9 L48-67, C11L49-67, and C12 L1-8 - - Using the STORM and PIPE system for identification and compliance purposes. It can be noted that the term “digest value” is being interpreted as value that is utilized to identify data in order to simplify data analysis. Markham discloses obtaining and utilizing diverse representations of time-related data and other manufacturing data in simplified versions in order to simplify data analysis). Claim 9 A reference method executed by a computer, wherein the computer is communicably connected to a storage unit, the storage unit storing, in association with identification information of a product and identification information of an item related to a manufacturing process, a digest value of the manufacturing process information related to the item among the manufacturing process information related to the manufacturing process of the product, wherein the reference method comprising: acquiring the identification information of the product to be referenced; and outputting reference information by which it can determine, for one or more of the items, whether or not the digest value of the manufacturing process information is stored in the storage unit in association with the identification information of the item and the identification information of the product to be referenced (C5-6, C9 L48-67, C11L49-67, and C12 L1-8 - - Using the STORM and PIPE system for identification and compliance purposes. It can be noted that the term “digest value” is being interpreted as value that is utilized to identify data in order to simplify data analysis. Markham discloses obtaining and utilizing diverse representations of time-related data and other manufacturing data in simplified versions in order to simplify data analysis). Claim 10 The reference method according to claim 9, wherein the manufacturing process information is data of a procedure manual that defines a procedure of a work related to manufacturing of the product, data indicating that the manufacturing process of the product complies with a guideline, or data indicating a record of a work performed in the manufacturing process of the product 1(C5-6, C9 L48-67, C11L49-67, and C12 L1-8 - - Using the STORM and PIPE system for identification and compliance purposes. It can be noted that the term “digest value” is being interpreted as value that is utilized to identify data in order to simplify data analysis. Markham discloses obtaining and utilizing diverse representations of time-related data and other manufacturing data in simplified versions in order to simplify data analysis). Claim 11 The reference method according to claim 9, further comprising: determining the identification information of each of a plurality of the items that can be associated with the identification information of the product to be referenced; and outputting the reference information for each of the determined items (C5-6, C9 L48-67, C11L49-67, and C12 L1-8 - - Using the STORM and PIPE system for identification and compliance purposes. It can be noted that the term “digest value” is being interpreted as value that is utilized to identify data in order to simplify data analysis. Markham discloses obtaining and utilizing diverse representations of time-related data and other manufacturing data in simplified versions in order to simplify data analysis). Claim 12 The reference method according to claim 9, further comprising: acquiring the identification information of the item to be referenced; and outputting the reference information for the acquired identification information of the item to be referenced (C5-6, C9 L48-67, C11L49-67, and C12 L1-8 - - Using the STORM and PIPE system for identification and compliance purposes. It can be noted that the term “digest value” is being interpreted as value that is utilized to identify data in order to simplify data analysis. Markham discloses obtaining and utilizing diverse representations of time-related data and other manufacturing data in simplified versions in order to simplify data analysis). Claim 21 The reference apparatus according to claim 3: wherein the digest value of the manufacturing process information is a hash value that is generated by applying a hash function to time-stamped manufacturing process information (C5-6, C9 L48-67, C11L49-67, and C12 L1-8 - - Using the STORM and PIPE system for identification and compliance purposes. It can be noted that the term “digest value” is being interpreted as value that is utilized to identify data in order to simplify data analysis. Markham discloses obtaining and utilizing diverse representations of time-related data and other manufacturing data in simplified versions in order to simplify data analysis). Claim 22 The reference apparatus according to claim 3: wherein the digest value of the manufacturing process information is used to detect a modification to the manufacturing process information (C5-6, C9 L48-67, C11L49-67, and C12 L1-8 - - Using the STORM and PIPE system for identification and compliance purposes. It can be noted that the term “digest value” is being interpreted as value that is utilized to identify data in order to simplify data analysis. Markham discloses obtaining and utilizing diverse representations of time-related data and other manufacturing data in simplified versions in order to simplify data analysis). Claim 23 The reference apparatus according to claim 3: wherein the reference information that indicates that the digest value of the manufacturing process information is stored includes an input interface to be displayed on a screen, the input interface enabling a user to acquire the digest value of the manufacturing process information (C5-6, C9 L48-67, C11L49-67, and C12 L1-8 - - Using the STORM and PIPE system for identification and compliance purposes. It can be noted that the term “digest value” is being interpreted as value that is utilized to identify data in order to simplify data analysis. Markham discloses obtaining and utilizing diverse representations of time-related data and other manufacturing data in simplified versions in order to simplify data analysis). Claim 24 The reference method according to claim 9: wherein the digest value of the manufacturing process information is a hash value that is generated by applying a hash function to time-stamped manufacturing process information (C5-6, C9 L48-67, C11L49-67, and C12 L1-8 - - Using the STORM and PIPE system for identification and compliance purposes. It can be noted that the term “digest value” is being interpreted as value that is utilized to identify data in order to simplify data analysis. Markham discloses obtaining and utilizing diverse representations of time-related data and other manufacturing data in simplified versions in order to simplify data analysis). Claim 25 The reference method according to claim 9: wherein the digest value of the manufacturing process information is used to detect a modification to the manufacturing process information (C5-6, C9 L48-67, C11L49-67, and C12 L1-8 - - Using the STORM and PIPE system for identification and compliance purposes. It can be noted that the term “digest value” is being interpreted as value that is utilized to identify data in order to simplify data analysis. Markham discloses obtaining and utilizing diverse representations of time-related data and other manufacturing data in simplified versions in order to simplify data analysis). Claim 26 The reference method according to claim 9: wherein the reference information that indicates that the digest value of the manufacturing process information is stored includes an input interface to be displayed on a screen, the input interface enabling a user to acquire the digest value of the manufacturing process information (C5-6, C9 L48-67, C11L49-67, and C12 L1-8 - - Using the STORM and PIPE system for identification and compliance purposes. It can be noted that the term “digest value” is being interpreted as value that is utilized to identify data in order to simplify data analysis. Markham discloses obtaining and utilizing diverse representations of time-related data and other manufacturing data in simplified versions in order to simplify data analysis). Citation of Pertinent Prior Art The following prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Arnold et al., US Patent No. 9,280,331 – hash-based comparators. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CARLOS R ORTIZ RODRIGUEZ whose telephone number is (571)272-3766. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri 10:00 am- 6:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mohammad Ali can be reached on 571-272-4105. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CARLOS R ORTIZ RODRIGUEZ/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2119
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 25, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jan 02, 2026
Response Filed
May 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12734739
Molding Management System
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12724944
METHOD, SYSTEM, DEVICE FOR TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION, AND TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZED COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12715182
MATCHING PIECES AND KITS FOR REPAIRING BROKEN STRUCTURES AND RELATED METHODS
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12704835
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A PLANT OF SEPARATION AND TREATMENT INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES WITHOUT CHEMICAL REACTION
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704824
WORKFLOW FOR EFFICIENT PARAMETERIZATION OF A NUMERICAL CONTROL
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+10.9%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 730 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month