Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/274,142

ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION WITH GEOGRID AND GEOTEXTILE, METHODS OF PRODUCING AND PROVIDING SUCH AND ITS USE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jul 25, 2023
Priority
Jan 28, 2021 — GB 2101168.9 +1 more
Examiner
HARTMANN, GARY S
Art Unit
3671
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Tensar Technologies Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
914 granted / 1260 resolved
+20.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1300
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
75.2%
+35.2% vs TC avg
§102
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§112
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1260 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed 3 April 2025 has not been considered because the translation provided is illegible. Specification The title of the invention is too long. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because it refers to the purported merits of the invention and is a run-on type sentence. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Claim Objections Claims 4-16, 21-34 and 38-51 are objected to under 37 CFR 1.75(c) as being in improper form because a multiple dependent claim cannot depend from another multiple dependent claim. See MPEP § 608.01(n). Accordingly, the claims have not been further treated on the merits. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 35-37 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The preambles of claims 35-37 recite a “use,” which denotes a process of using; however, there are no process recitations therein. The claims may be a product or a process, but not both. The purposes (“improve the fatigue life” and “reduce the depth”) do not add patentable weight or meaning to either a product or a process. As a product, these claims are essentially duplicates of claim 1. As a process, these have no steps. Claims 35-37 have not been further treated on the merits. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 and 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Mercer et al. (GB 2 225 048). Mercer discloses a construction including a polymer geogrid (4) at least partially embedded in a bound aggregate layer (5) with a geotextile (2) affixed to the geogrid (Figure 1). Mercer meets the method recitation of claims 17-19. Regarding claims 2 and 20, the mesh naturally has at least two axes. Looking to Figure 1, because of the nodes (at lead line 4) include increased depth, they are deemed to meet the recitations of triaxial. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The additional references teach multi-layered constructions. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GARY S HARTMANN whose telephone number is (571)272-6989. The examiner can normally be reached 11-7:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher Sebesta can be reached at 571 272-0547. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. GARY S. HARTMANN Primary Examiner Art Unit 3671 /GARY S HARTMANN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3671
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 25, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679483
AUTOMATICALLY ADJUSTING SWING LEGS FOR MOUNTING AND ALIGNING AND REORIENTING CRAWLERS
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680235
WATER-PERMEABLE-RETENTIVE PAVEMENT STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF CONSTRUCTING THE STRUCTURE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12682718
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND CURB SYSTEM HAVING THE SAME
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674289
SEISMIC DAMPING PEIR FOUNDATION SYSTEM FOR SEISMIC ISOLATION
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12674295
ENCLOSURE COVER ASSEMBLIES
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+18.9%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1260 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month