Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/274,530

BASE STATION SYNCHRONIZATION USING UE MODEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 27, 2023
Priority
Jan 27, 2021 — provisional 63/142,002 +1 more
Examiner
HUYNH, CHUCK
Art Unit
2644
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Airspan Ip Holdco LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
350 granted / 488 resolved
+9.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
521
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
82.4%
+42.4% vs TC avg
§102
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
§112
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 488 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement IDS(es) submitted on 12/3/2025 has/have been considered. Oath/Declaration Oath/Declaration filed on 4/3/2026 has been acknowledged. Drawings Drawing(s) submitted on 7/27/2023 have been acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6, and 8-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chauhan et al. (US 2020/0383072; hereinafter Chauhan). Regarding claims 1 and 20, Chauhan discloses a fifth generation (5G) or later generation standard cellular base station unit (Fig. 2; cellular base station) comprising: at least one user equipment (UE) modem operative to receive wireless signals from at least one external base station and to derive at least one synchronization signal based on said wireless signals received from said at least one external base station (Fig. 2, base station 202 and the NB-IoT modem 203; [0052]-[0053]: synchronizing small cell 202 with macro cell 201); and a 5G base station sub-unit operative to receive said at least one synchronization signal from said at least one UE modem and to employ said at least one synchronization signal to synchronize internal functions of said 5G base station sub-unit (Fig. 2, synchronization processing module 204; [0052]-[0053]: synchronizing small cell 202 with macro cell 201). Regarding claim 2, Chauhan discloses the unit according to claim 1, wherein said base station sub-unit is one of a gNB and a radio unit (RU) (Fig. 2, small cell 202-204; [0080]). Regarding claim 3, Chauhan discloses the unit according to claim 1, wherein said UE modem does not include a Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) of any type (Chauhan does not disclose any SIM). Regarding claim 4, Chaunhan discloses the unit according to claim 3, wherein said UE modem is operative to communicate with said external base station until said UE modem receives from said external base station a timing advance value of said signals received from said external base station, and may or may not stop communicating with said external base station upon receiving said timing advance value ([0015]-[0016]: initial timing synchronization between small and macro cell; [0053]). Regarding claim 5, Chauhan discloses the unit according to claim 1, and also comprising a bi- directional communication protocol between said base station sub-unit and said UE modem (Fig. 4; [0076]-[0079]: commination between NB-Iot modem and small cell). Regarding claim 6, Chauhan discloses the unit according to claim 5, wherein: said base station sub-unit is operative to provide information or queries to said UE modem (Fig. 4; [0076]-[0079]: commination between NB-Iot modem and small cell); and said UE modem is operative to function based on said information or queries (Fig. 4; [0076]-[0079]: commination between NB-Iot modem and small cell). Regarding claim 8, Chauhan discloses the unit according to claim 1 and also comprising a GNSS receiver included in said unit and in operative communication with said UE modem ([0053]: GNSS receiver), said UE modem being operative to ascertain a geographical location of said base station unit and to provide said geographical location to said GNSS receiver ([0053]: use of GNSS satellites for location information: [0010]: GPS), said GNSS receiver being operative to generate an additional synchronization signal based on said location and on a signal from at least one GNSS satellite, said base station sub-unit being operative to receive said additional synchronization signal from said GNSS receiver and to employ said additional synchronization signal to time synchronize said base-station sub-unit with said at least one GNSS satellite ([0053:further use of GNSS for synchronization with other macro cells). Regarding claim 9, Chauhan discloses the unit according to claim 1, wherein said wireless signals comprise at least one of 5G standard signals, Long Term Evolution (LTE) standard signals, LTE-Machine Type Communication (LTE-M) standard signals and Narrowband Internet of Things (NB-IoT) standard signals ([0086]: 5G; [0008]: LTE-M, LTE; [0077]: NB-IoT). Regarding claim 10, Chauhan discloses the unit according to claim 1, wherein said UE modem is operative to select said external base station and to derive said at least one synchronization signal based on said wireless signals received from said external base station based on at least one of: a quality level of said wireless signals received from said external base station, a base station stratum level of said external base station as reported by said external base station ([0011]: use of synchronization stratum); and a base station operator identity as reported by said external base station ([0015], [0053]: cell identification information). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chauhan in view of Khalid (US 2021/0127342). Regarding claim 7, Chauhan discloses all the particulars of the claim but is unclear about the unit according to claim 1, wherein said base station sub- unit is operative to receive timing information from a network time protocol (NTP). However, Khalid does disclose the limitation of wherein said base station sub- unit is operative to receive timing information from a network time protocol (NTP) (Fig. 5; [0014], [050]: use of NTP over NB-IoT network). It would have been obvious to one ordinarily skilled in the art at the time of invention to incorporate Khalid’s disclosure to provide improved timing and synchronization with macro cell. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHUCK HUYNH whose telephone number is (571)272-7866. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10am - 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kathy Wang-Hurst can be reached at 571-270-5371. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHUCK HUYNH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2644
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 27, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 17, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12659844
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NETWORK SLICE INDICATOR
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12647905
LOAD-BASED POWER ADJUSTMENTS FOR CELLULAR COMMUNICATION SITES
5y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12647769
WIFI ROAMING METHOD AND DEVICE, MOBILE TERMINAL, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
4y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12647873
Method and Apparatus for Service Handling
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12648015
COLLISIONS RULES CONSIDERATIONS BETWEEN PRS AND OTHER DOWNLINK CHANNELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+13.9%)
3y 6m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 488 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month