Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/274,637

SHOCK ABSORBER AND VALVE APPARATUS

Final Rejection §102§Other
Filed
Jul 27, 2023
Examiner
HSIAO, JAMES K
Art Unit
3616
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Hitachi Astemo, Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
597 granted / 780 resolved
+24.5% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
821
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
31.2%
-8.8% vs TC avg
§102
41.5%
+1.5% vs TC avg
§112
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 780 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §Other
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Yuno et al. (WO 2020149224 A1). For examining purposes, the English equivalent US-20220099153 of WO 2020149224 A1 has been relied on below. Regarding claim 1, Yuno et al. discloses a shock absorber (fig 1) comprising: a cylinder (2) sealingly containing hydraulic fluid therein (fig 1); a piston (3) partitioning an inside of the cylinder into a first chamber and a second chamber (2A/2B); and a valve member (at least 101) configured to open and close a passage (at least 21/22) provided in the piston (fig 2), wherein an annular first seat portion (at least 102 and the annular stepped portion adjacent thereto, see annotated fig 2 below) protruding from the piston (3) is formed on the piston (3) on an outer peripheral side with respect to an opening of the passage (21/22), wherein an annular first protrusion portion (stepped portion adjacent 102, see annotated fig 2 below) and an annular second protrusion portion (102, see annotated fig 2 below) are formed on the first seat portion (see annotated fig 2 below), the second protrusion portion extending in a direction away from the piston further than the first protrusion portion (at least downward in fig 2), and wherein the valve member is placed in abutment with only the second protrusion portion in a state of being mounted on the piston (fig 2 at least at 102) and wherein the second protrusion portion is formed at an acute angle (see below) such that the second protrusion portion can linearly contact the valve member (see annotated figure below) . PNG media_image1.png 562 762 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Yuno et al. discloses wherein the valve member has a first side that faces the piston and an opposite second side which faces away from the piston (fig 2), and wherein a pilot chamber (105 and/or 205) is provided on the piston side of the valve member, the pilot chamber (at least 105) being configured to apply a back- pressure to the valve member (at least [0026]). Regarding claim 3, Yuno et al. discloses wherein the valve member is a disk valve (103) with a packing (107) baked thereto ([0027]). Regarding claim 4, Yuno et al. discloses wherein the valve member (101) includes a disk valve (at least 103), an axially movable spool member (31), and a seal member (at least 107) provided between the disk valve and the spool member (fig 2). Regarding claim 5, Yuno et al. discloses a piston (3) partitioning an inside of the cylinder into a first chamber and a second chamber (2A/2B); and a valve member (at least 101) configured to open and close a passage (at least 21/22) provided in the piston (fig 2), wherein an annular first seat portion (at least 102 and the annular stepped portion adjacent thereto, see annotated fig 2 above) protruding from the piston (3) is formed on the piston (3) on an outer peripheral side with respect to an opening of the passage (21/22), wherein an annular first protrusion portion (stepped portion adjacent 102, see annotated fig 2 above) and an annular second protrusion portion (102, see annotated fig 2 above) are formed on the first seat portion (see annotated fig 2 above), the second protrusion portion extending in a direction away from the piston further than the first protrusion portion (at least downward in fig 2), wherein the valve member is placed in abutment with only the second protrusion portion in a state of being mounted on the piston (fig 2 at least at 102) and wherein the second protrusion portion is formed at an acute angle (see above) such that the second protrusion portion can linearly contact the valve member (see annotated figure above). Regarding claim 6, Yuno et al. discloses wherein the valve member is a disk valve (101/103) with a packing (107) baked thereto ([0027]). Regarding claim 7, Yuno et al. discloses wherein the valve member (101) includes a disk valve (at least 103), an axially movable spool member (31), and a seal member (at least 107) provided between the disk valve and the spool member (fig 2). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 02/17/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Regarding claims 1 and 5, Applicant argues that the prior art of record lacks wherein the second protrusion portion is formed at an acute angle such that the second protrusion portion can linearly contact the valve member, Examiner respectfully disagrees. Applicant argues that the second protrusion of Yuno as indicated above is a flat sheet surface and is not acutely angled. It has been interpreted that the second protrusion as set forth above at least forms an acute angle with respect to the valve. Applicant notes that with the configuration of claim 1, the contact area can be maximally reduced. However, claim 1 does not require that the contact area be reduced and also does not preclude a flat sheet surface contact area. With regards to contact, claims 1 and 5 only require linear contact of the valve member. It has been interpreted that element 1023 linear contacts the valve member at least in an axial direction of operation. It appears that the arguments are more specific than the limitations set by the claims. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES K HSIAO whose telephone number is (571)272-6259. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5, Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Siconolfi can be reached at 571-272-7124. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.K.H/Examiner, Art Unit 3616 /Robert A. Siconolfi/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3616
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 27, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §Other
Nov 28, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §Other
Feb 17, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 06, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595834
SEALING DEVICE AND DAMPER FOR HYDRAULIC EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12576680
SYNTHETIC ELASTOMERIC AIR SPRING WITHOUT REINFORCING FIBERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12545093
Hydro-Mount
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12537125
SOLENOID, DAMPING FORCE ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM, AND DAMPING FORCE ADJUSTABLE SHOCK ABSORBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12529408
VIBRATION DAMPER HAVING TWO ADJUSTABLE DAMPING VALVE DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+15.3%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 780 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month