Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/274,682

Rotatable Hip Prosthesis

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jul 27, 2023
Priority
Jan 27, 2021 — provisional 63/142,103 +1 more
Examiner
DUDDEN, TERESA MARIE
Art Unit
3774
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Emory University
OA Round
2 (Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allowance Rate
13 granted / 27 resolved
-21.9% vs TC avg
Strong +45% interview lift
Without
With
+45.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
75
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
52.3%
+12.3% vs TC avg
§102
20.2%
-19.8% vs TC avg
§112
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 27 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see applicant remarks pg. 7-8, filed 07/13/2026, with respect to claim 1 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The prior art rejection of claim 1 has been withdrawn. Claim Status The drawing objection, claim objection and 35 U.S.C. 112(b) rejections have been overcome. Claims 1-5, 7-9 and 11-17 are examined below. Claim Objections Claim 5 objected to because of the following informalities: "the bolt including a head and the shaft" should read "the bolt include. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 8 objected to because of the following informalities: "the one or more section includes" . Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 8-9 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 8 recites “the one or more section”, “the first section” and “the second section”. It is unclear if these are the same sections as recited in claim 1 as a part of the through hole of the proximal body or as a part of the mounting member as indicated in line 2 of claim 8. The Examiner recommends amending all uses of “one or more sections”, “first section”, “second section” and “third section” found in claims 1 and 8 to be followed by what part they belong to. For instance, “the first section of the through hole of the proximal body” and “the first section of the mounting member”. If amendments are made to the first and second sections in claim 1, they should be made in dependent claim 11 as well. Dependent claim 9 is likewise rejected. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-5, 7 and 11-17 allowed. Claims 8-9 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TERESA M DUDDEN whose telephone number is (571)272-0435. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Tuesday and Thursday-Friday 7:30 am-6:00 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JERRAH C EDWARDS can be reached at 408-918-7557. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /T.M.D./Examiner, Art Unit 3774 /YASHITA SHARMA/Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3774
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 27, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 13, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12714553
INTRAOCULAR LENS WITH FOCAL PERFORMANCE TAILORED TO PUPIL SIZE DEPLOYING REFRACTIVE POWER MODIFICATION ALONG SPIRAL TRACKS
4y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12653673
ANNULAR AUGMENTATION DEVICE FOR CARDIAC VALVE REPAIR
5y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12648854
ARTIFICIAL JOINT STEM
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12594167
HIP IMPLANT SYSTEM
3y 4m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589015
STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM, ENDOSCOPE SYSTEM, AND STENT INDWELLING METHOD
3y 7m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+45.2%)
3y 10m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 27 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month