Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/275,216

NI-BASED ALLOY POWDER FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED COMPONENT, AND ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING METHOD

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Aug 01, 2023
Priority
Feb 05, 2021 — JP 2021-017109 +1 more
Examiner
MORALES, RICARDO D
Art Unit
1738
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Proterial Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
358 granted / 440 resolved
+16.4% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
473
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
88.0%
+48.0% vs TC avg
§102
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§112
5.1%
-34.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 440 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Okada et al. (US20220145429A1). Regarding Claim 1, Okada teaches a Ni-based powder for powder bed fusion additive manufacturing (abstract) comprising in Mass% [0010]: Element Claimed Range Prior Art Range Cr 10-16 10-16 Al 4-9 4.5-7.5 Mo 1-6 2.8-6.2 Nb 0.5-4 0.8-4 Ti 0-0.5 0.01-2 Zr 0-0.5 0.01-0.3 C 0.06-0.4 0.01-0.3 B 0-0.04 0.001-0.03 Ni Balance Balance 120Nb+650Zr+32Ti-385C 150-270 98-623 (calculated) The claimed composition overlaps with the claimed range, establishing a prima facie case of obviousness for the claimed invention. (See MPEP 2144.05(I)). Regarding Claim 2, the claimed range of 0.01-2% overlaps with the claimed range of 0.002-0.2%, the claimed composition overlaps with the claimed range, establishing a prima facie case of obviousness for the claimed invention. (See MPEP 2144.05(I)). Regarding Claims 3-5, the formed part has dendrites with a spacing (element segregation parts) of 3 microns or less [0025] encompassing the claimed range of 200 nm or less; but is silent regarding the dendrite width of 5 microns or less. However, as the prior art invention is made by a similar powder bed fusion scanning method, one of ordinary skill in the art would have expected the dendrites to have a similar width on the same scale as the dendrite spacing and as claimed under the expectation that products made by similar methods have similar properties. (See MPEP 2112.01(I)), and would have similar concentrations of Cr, Mo, Nb and Zr as claimed in claim 4. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RICARDO D MORALES whose telephone number is (571)272-6691. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 9 am- 4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sally Merkling can be reached at 5712726297. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RICARDO D MORALES/Examiner, Art Unit 1738
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 01, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §103
Jan 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 10, 2026
Response Filed
May 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636702
CALIBRATION OF A SYSTEM FOR SELECTIVE POWDER MELTING
3y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636654
Method for grinding powders, method for coating a material, metal particles, coated material and uses of these
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630910
High Manganese Alloyed Steels For Amine Service
3y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630912
HIGH STRENGTH ZINC-PLATED STEEL SHEET HAVING EXCELLENT UNIFORM SPOT WELDABILITY ALONG WIDTH DIRECTION AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630480
METHOD FOR MAKING MAX PHASE COMPOSITES
2y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+16.7%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 440 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month