Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
DETAILED ACTION
Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114
A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on August 6, 2026 has been entered. Claims 57 and 59 are currently pending and an Office action on the merits follows.
Response to Arguments
Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 57 and 59 have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claim(s) 57 and 59 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Pub No.: US-20240056415-A1 (herein “Tang”), and further in view of Pub No.: US-20230013720-A1 (herein “Gupta”)
Consider claim 57, Tang teaches an Edge Configuration Server (ECS) (see Tang Fig. 7, note ECS) comprising:
at least one memory (see Tang Fig. 11, [0154] note memory); and
at least one processor (see Tang Fig. 11, [0154] note processor) coupled to the at least one memory and configured to:
receive, from an Edge Enabler Client (EEC), a service provisioning request comprising Application Client profile (AC profile) information (see Tang Fig. 7, [0063], Table 1 note 701 EEC sends provisioning request to ECS including the Application Client (AC) profile which includes the Expected Application Client Geographical Service Area and Service Continuity Support);
perform processing for identifying an Edge Enabler Server (EES) based on the AC profile information (see Tang Fig. 7, [0063]-[0065], Table 1 determining the EES information based on the received service provisioning request including the AC profile).
Tang fails to teach “in a case where the EES is not identified in the processing, send, to the EEC, a response comprising information indicating an alternative server. Gupta explains the ECS provisioning the EEC of the UE depending on the availability of the EES at the data edge network where the EEC can query the ECS for obtaining the information about the edge application server or to a dedicated server (see Gupta [0089]-[0094]).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Tang to include the recited teaching of Gupta. Such a modification would improve Tang by improving management of discovery of edge application servers (see Gupta [0014]-[0017]).
Claim(s) 59 is/are rejected for at least the same reason(s) set forth in claim 57.
Contact Information
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARCUS C HAMMONDS whose telephone number is (571)270-3193. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10:00AM-6:00PM.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ALISON T. SLATER can be reached at (571)270-0375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/MARCUS HAMMONDS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2647
Prosecution Insights