Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/276,402

Free-Folding Apparatus for Pouch-Type Batteries

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 08, 2023
Priority
Dec 01, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0170400 +1 more
Examiner
ESSEX, STEPHAN J
Art Unit
1727
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
50%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
455 granted / 692 resolved
+0.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -16% lift
Without
With
+-16.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
718
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
87.5%
+47.5% vs TC avg
§102
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§112
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 692 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1, 2 and 6-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Suh et al. (hereinafter “Suh”) (U.S. Pub. No. 2020/0331187 A1, cited by Applicant). Regarding claims 1, 2, 6, Suh teaches an apparatus 100 for manufacturing a battery pouch comprising a die 110 in which a pair of forming grooves 112 are formed with a partition wall 111 (rib having a forming protrusion whose upper end is flat) therebetween in a top surface thereof, on which a pouch film 10a (laminate sheet including a bridge) is disposed; and a pair of punches 120 (pushers; bar-type pusher) disposed above the die 110 to form a pair of accommodation parts 11 in the pouch film 10a while being respectively inserted into the pair of forming grooves 112 in a state of pressing the pouch film 10a (see paragraph 40). That is, in the apparatus 100 for manufacturing the pouch according to the first embodiment of the present invention, the pouch film 10a is disposed on a top surface of the die 110, and then, the pair of punches 120 descend. As a result, the pair of punches 120 are inserted into the forming grooves 112 in the state of pressing the pouch film 10a to form the accommodation parts 11 in the pouch film 10a (pusher is configured to press a sharp portion of the bridge) (see paragraph 41). The pair of punches 120 are provided on a punch holder 130 (pusher support portion). That is, the pair of punches 120 may be disposed on a bottom surface of the punch holder 130. Thus, when the punch holder 130 descends or ascends (configured to move in a vertical direction), the pair of punches 120 may descend or ascend at the same time (see paragraph 52). As clearly illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2 of Suh, the punches 120 are aligned with the partition wall 111 such that the partition wall 111 passes between the punches 120 when the punch holder 130 and the punches 120 descend (pusher aligned with the forming protrusion). Although Suh does not explicitly teach a frame including which supports the die 110 and the punch holder 130, it is understood by one of ordinary skill that these elements of Suh are not intended to be free-floating or manipulated by hand. It is well within the ambit of the ordinary artisan to provide adequate support and actuation for the apparatus of Suh, including a frame to permit the vertical motion of the punch holder and to support the die beneath it. Regarding claim 7, it is clear from FIGS. 1 and 2 of Suh that the punches 120 are wider than a width of the partition wall 111. Regarding claim 8, although Suh does not explicitly teach that stopping the downward movement of the pusher support portion when a power load applied during the downward movement of the pusher support reaches a reference value, it is well known in the art to provide safety measures by which the downward motion of a punch is stopped to prevent damage to the die or the punch itself. It is well within the ambit of the ordinary artisan to set a variety of threshold conditions for parameters such as force, pressure, time, or power, under which these safety measures may be engaged. Regarding claim 9, Suh teaches that a heating member 140 may be disposed on or closely attached to the partition wall 111 to heat the pouch film 10a (see paragraph 53). Regarding claim 10, although Suh does not explicitly teach a temperature range of the heater, it is understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that it is undesirable to melt the battery pouch during a punching process for shaping the battery pouch. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHAN J ESSEX whose telephone number is (571)270-7866. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:30 am - 6:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Barbara Gilliam can be reached at (571) 272-1330. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEPHAN J ESSEX/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1727
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 08, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683160
OLIVINE COMPOSITE CATHODE MATERIAL, PREPARATION METHOD AND APPLICATION THEREOF, AND LITHIUM-ION BATTERY
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676327
METHOD FOR OPERATING A FUEL CELL SYSTEM, AND CONTROL DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12620628
ALCOHOL-BASED ELECTROLYTES FOR HIGHLY REVERSIBLE ZN METAL BATTERIES
4y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12603296
CLAD CURRENT COLLECTORS INCLUDING THERMAL INTERFACE LAYER FOR BIPOLAR SOLID-STATE BATTERIES
3y 8m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603304
FUEL CELL AND MOBILE UNIT
2y 8m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
50%
With Interview (-16.3%)
3y 8m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 692 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month