Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/276,854

SENSOR PACKAGE, SENSOR MODULE, AND SENSOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 10, 2023
Examiner
GZYBOWSKI, MICHAEL STANLEY
Art Unit
1798
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Kyocera Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
96 granted / 139 resolved
+4.1% vs TC avg
Strong +53% interview lift
Without
With
+52.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
90 currently pending
Career history
229
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
51.0%
+11.0% vs TC avg
§102
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
§112
27.1%
-12.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 139 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Interpretation Claim 1 recites a first surface on which an inflow opening to the inner channel and an outflow opening from the inner channel are formed, and claim 2 recites that the first electrode group is provided on the back surface of the first surface. Applicant discloses that the first surface is os1 in Fig. 3 and the back surface is os2 (second surface) in Fig. 3. Figure 3 depicts the sensor package 10. For purposes of examination the first electrode group will be interpreted as being provided on the bottom surface of the sensor package and not on the flat top surface ts shown in Fig. 3. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2019/0383761 to Kimura et al. (cited by applicant) Kimura et al. discloses a gas sensor module 10 that includes one or more sensor elements 40 that detect a component (gas) in a fluid. [0048], [0054] The gas sensor module 10 includes an internal flow channel (detection space S1) in which the one of more sensors 40 are provided and through which the fluid is caused to flow. [0053] The gas sensor module 10 includes a container (package 30) having a first face (cover 33) formed with a fluid inlet (opening 33a) leading into the internal flow channel S1 and a fluid outlet (opening 33a) leading from the internal flow channel S1. [0053] An electrode group (terminals 34) that is electrically connected to the one of more sensor (40) is provided on a different face of the container (30) than the first face. [0052] Fig. 1. I.) As noted above, Kimura et al. teaches all the elements of claim 1. Therefore, Kimura et al. anticipates claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-9 are allowed. The prior art of record does not teach or suggest a sensor module having a package placement surface on which a supply port and a discharge port are configured to enable a fluid to flow to a sensor package as recited in claim 1, and sealing bodies that are provided at the supply port and the discharge port and are configured to seal a connecting portion between the supply port and the inflow opening and a connecting portion between the discharge port and the outflow opening, and a fixing portion that is configured to detachably fix the sensor package by pressing the sensor package against the package placement surface as recited in claim 6. Claims 7-9 depend from claim 6. Claims 2-5, 10 and 11 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art of record does not teach or suggest a sensor package as recited in claim 1, wherein the electrode group contains a first electrode group and a second electrode group both of which are configured to output detection of the plurality of sensors with the first electrode group being provided on a back surface of the first surface and the second electrode group being provided on a surface between the first surface and the back surface, as recited in claim 2. Claims 3-5, 10 and 11 depend from claim 2. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL S. GZYBOWSKI whose telephone number is (571)270-3487. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Charles Capozzi can be reached at 571-270-3638. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL STANLEY GZYBOWSKI/Examiner, Art Unit 1798
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 10, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601721
TEST KIT AND DETECTION METHOD FOR ISOTHIAZOLINONES IN TEXTILES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596127
PREDICTION OF THE CONTENT OF OMEGA-3 POLYUNSATURATED FATTY ACIDS IN THE RETINA BY MEASURING 7 CHOLESTEROL ESTER MOLECULES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594558
AT-HOME KIT FOR PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING AND OTHER DISEASES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594552
CONTAINER AND LIQUID HANDLING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590946
TEST STRIP CONTAINER AND TEST STRIP DISCHARGING MECHANISM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+52.7%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 139 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month