Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/276,990

DAVIT DEVICE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Aug 11, 2023
Priority
Feb 12, 2021 — NO 20210184 +1 more
Examiner
VENNE, DANIEL V
Art Unit
3615
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Vestdavit Gruppen AS
OA Round
2 (Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
1182 granted / 1660 resolved
+19.2% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
1689
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
42.8%
+2.8% vs TC avg
§102
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
§112
46.8%
+6.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1660 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . An amendment was filed by applicant on 05/12/2026. Claims 1, 5, 8 and 10 are amended. Claims 1-10 are remaining in the application. Claim Objections Claims objected to because of the following informalities: The phrase “a boat” should be replaced with – the one or more boats or cargo devices – where recited in the claims, consistent with such phrase where first recited in the claims. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 6. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. 7. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor, regards as the invention. 8. The claimed feature/phrase “the boat” (and the phrase “the boat and cargo device” containing “the boat) lacks sufficient antecedent basis (where recited in independent claims 1, 8 and 9, and subsequent dependent claims without proper antecedent); the phrase “the boat” should be replaced with the phrase – the one or more boats or cargo devices – consistent with such phrase where first recited in independent claims 1, 8 and 9. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 8 and 9 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) set forth in this Office action. As best understood by the examiner, claims 2-7 and 10 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s remarks/arguments with respect to the claim(s) have been fully considered but are essentially moot due to applicant’s amended claims and the resulting new and/or modified grounds of rejection presented in this Final Office Action. Conclusion 12. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. 13. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL V VENNE whose telephone number is (571) 272-7947. The examiner can normally be reached between M-F, 7am-3:30pm Flex. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Samuel J. Morano can be reached on (571) 272-6684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). 14. If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Daniel V Venne/ Senior Examiner, Art Unit 3615 05/26/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 11, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §112
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 12, 2026
Response Filed
May 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679513
FIN STABILIZER
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679507
FLOATING BODY WITHOUT SEPARATE CONNECTION DEVICE AND CONNECTION METHOD THEREOF
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679505
ENCLOSURE SYSTEM FOR A PONTOON BOAT
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673749
BOAT WINDSHIELD FRAME
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12662228
MARINE MOTOR ASSEMBLY AND METHOD FOR CHANGING LUBRICANT IN A MARINE MOTOR ASSEMBLY
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+15.1%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1660 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month