Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 09, 2026
Application No. 18/277,063

BRAIN STIMULATING DEVICE INCLUDING NAVIGATION DEVICE FOR GUIDING POSITION OF COIL AND METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 11, 2023
Priority
Feb 26, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0026670 +1 more
Examiner
COOK, CHRISTOPHER L
Art Unit
3797
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Advanced Technology&Communications Co. Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
47%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 47% of resolved cases
47%
Career Allowance Rate
262 granted / 555 resolved
-22.8% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+26.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 7m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
602
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§103
43.3%
+3.3% vs TC avg
§102
8.7%
-31.3% vs TC avg
§112
34.4%
-5.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 555 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 06/12/2026 has been entered. Claim Objections Claim 8 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 8 is objected to because acronyms (RC) should be defined at their first occurrence. Claim 16 is objected to because the limitation “including comprising” (line 2) is redundant and confusing. Claims 17-18 appear to have the same issue. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-15 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 is rejected because it is unclear if the magnetic stimulation at the brain region is the zero point position as now claimed. Examiner notes amended claim 1 includes a step to return the coil to the zero point position right before the final step of performing stimulation but fails to specify if the coil is moved from the zero point position for the stimulation. Claims 19-20 appear to have the same issue(s). Claim 2 is rejected because it is unclear if the calibrated zero point is the zero point position set forth in Claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 16-18 are considered allowable but for the minor informalities as described above. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 06/12/2026 have been fully considered and are persuasive to overcome the prior art rejections of Claims 1-20. New 35 U.S.C. 112(b) rejections necessitated by amendment. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. U.S. Publication No. 2011/0082326 to Mishelevich et al. which discloses a transcranial magnetic stimulation system and method where multiple coil arrays are used for stimulation and real-time feedback. The feedback is used to modify stimulation parameters including coil position (Paragraphs [0045]-[0051]). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER L COOK whose telephone number is (571)270-7373. The examiner can normally be reached M-F approximately 8AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anne Kozak can be reached at 571-270-0552. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER L COOK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3797
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Sep 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 05, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 12, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678242
IMAGE GUIDED ROBOTIC CONVERGENT ABLATION
8y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12661197
TELEOPERATED SURGICAL SYSTEM WITH PATIENT HEALTH RECORDS BASED INSTRUMENT CONTROL
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653498
ULTRASONIC DIAGNOSIS APPARATUS
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12636085
ELASTOGRAPHY FOR LIGAMENT CHARACTERIZATION
1y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631705
NOISE-REDUCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE TOMOGRAPHY UNIT
2y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
47%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+26.6%)
4y 7m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 555 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month